Muslim World Report

Trump's Presidency and the Kremlin's Growing Influence

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 15, 2025 10:20 AM | 7 min read | 1447 words

TL;DR: Donald Trump’s presidency raises significant concerns about Kremlin influence on U.S. policy, particularly highlighted by his response to the recent attack in Sumy, Ukraine. This blog post explores the implications of Trump’s rhetoric and policies, the potential for EU sanctions against Russia, and what-if scenarios regarding U.S. isolationism and public accountability that could reshape international relations. The stakes are high, with a pressing need for an informed electorate and a strategic response to counter foreign influence.

Assessing the Kremlin’s Influence: Is Trump’s Presidency Serving Russian Interests?

The Situation

The ongoing reverberations of Donald Trump’s presidency pose significant concerns regarding the Kremlin’s influence on U.S. policy and its broader implications for global stability.

Recent events, particularly the attack in Sumy, Ukraine, have prompted renewed calls from EU foreign ministers for sanctions against Russia, reflecting a unified stance against aggression. However, this moment is underscored by the erratic and often contradictory rhetoric from Trump, who downplayed the severity of the incident, labeling it a mere “mistake.”

Such statements not only contradict the European position but also raise alarm bells about the extent to which Trump may be unwittingly serving Russian interests (Kuchins & Zevelev, 2011; Löfflmann, 2019).

Key Concerns:

  • Fractures in American Democracy: Trump’s policies, particularly his economic isolationism epitomized by tariffs aimed at “Making America Great Again,” could create an environment where American interests are increasingly misaligned with traditional allies such as the EU.

  • Alignment with Russian Goals: The questions surrounding Trump’s foreign policy decisions elevate concerns about a potential alignment with Russian strategic goals, suggesting that the Kremlin’s ability to manipulate American governance is more pronounced than previously acknowledged (Rauta, 2019; Elswah & Howard, 2020).

The irony lies in the fact that while Trump touts “The Art of the Deal,” he may, in fact, be playing directly into the hands of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Hypothetically, if Putin convinces Trump that tariffs are necessary to revive American industry, we could see self-inflicted isolation that undermines the U.S. economy. This echoes the isolationary policies of a bygone era (Acharya, 2017; Krekola & Mikkonen, 2011).

As Trump’s presidency continues on this trajectory, the risk of an irreversible shift in U.S. foreign policy grows. The Kremlin appears poised to capitalize on these developments, viewing Trump’s administration as an opportunity to expand its influence not just in Eastern Europe but globally.

What-If Scenarios

What if the EU Implements Sanctions Against Russia?

Should the European Union proceed with new sanctions against Russia in reaction to the attack in Sumy, it could lead to a dramatic shift in the geopolitical landscape. The imposition of sanctions would signal a robust European commitment to countering Russian aggression, potentially fostering a renewed sense of unity among EU member states (Christie, 2016; Eitelhuber, 2009).

Potential Outcomes:

  1. Bolstered EU Position: A unified stance could emphasize that European nations are willing to stand firm against violations of international law, particularly when it comes to protecting sovereignty.

  2. Strained Transatlantic Relations: If Trump’s administration continues to downplay or dismiss the significance of such actions, it risks further heightening tensions between the U.S. and Russia (Nikonov, 2002; Krekola & Mikkonen, 2011).

  3. Increased Risks of Military Confrontations: The geopolitical chessboard could see escalated risks of military confrontations, particularly in regions like Ukraine.

  4. Ripple Effects Globally: Destabilization in Europe could prompt countries in Africa and Asia to reconsider their alliances in light of a perceived decline in U.S. hegemony (Hirsch, 2008).

What if the U.S. Accelerates Its Isolationist Policies?

If the U.S. continues down the path of economic isolationism, exemplified by unilateral economic policies such as tariffs and withdrawal from global agreements, the implications for international relations could be severe.

Consequences Might Include:

  • Ceding Influence to Other Powers: An America that turns inward risks allowing China to fill the vacuum left by an increasingly disengaged Washington (Kisangani & Pickering, 2007; Porter, 2018).

  • Perceptions of American Weakness: This could prompt allies in Europe to undertake unilateral actions that fragment responses to shared challenges, such as climate change and national security threats (Rauta, 2019).

  • Strain on Alliances: A decline of the liberal international order that has governed global relations since World War II might occur (Nye, 2019; Trubowitz & Harris, 2019).

What if American Voters Demand Accountability?

If the American public begins to recognize and articulate the Kremlin’s influence over Trump’s presidency, the political landscape may shift dramatically. Increased demands for accountability could lead to a push for legislative and electoral reforms aimed at curbing foreign interference in American politics.

Potential Developments:

  • Grassroots Movements: A more informed electorate could galvanize movements emphasizing transparency and integrity in governance, potentially resulting in a re-evaluation of U.S. foreign policy priorities (Elswah & Howard, 2020; Löfflmann, 2019).

  • Political Awakening: Such a political awakening could foster grassroots movements emphasizing civic education about foreign policy issues, equipping citizens to hold their leaders accountable.

If voters express their dissatisfaction through the ballot box, it could lead to a reinvigorated political class prioritizing a robust stance against Russian aggression, potentially restoring old alliances and recalibrating American foreign policy toward a more collaborative framework.

Strategic Maneuvers

In light of the current geopolitical landscape dominated by Trump’s presidency and the Kremlin’s potential influence, a multipronged strategic approach is necessary for all players involved—Washington, Moscow, the EU, and Ukraine.

For the Trump Administration:

  • Reevaluation of International Commitments: An urgent reevaluation of partnerships is essential, involving re-engagement with NATO allies and reaffirming commitments to collective security arrangements that have historically deterred Russian aggression (Christie, 2016; Shleifer & Treisman, 2005).

  • Coherent Foreign Policy Message: The U.S. must articulate a coherent foreign policy aligned with democratic principles and human rights.

For the European Union:

  • Unified Calls for Sanctions: The EU should unite in its calls for sanctions against Russia while engaging in diplomatic dialogues to mitigate risks of escalation.

  • Clear Messaging: Effective messaging that underscores the rationale behind sanctions will be essential for maintaining public support (Bárd & Kochenov, 2022; Elswah & Howard, 2020).

For Ukraine:

  • Strengthening National Defenses: The focus should remain on enhancing military capabilities and fostering closer ties with the EU and NATO.

  • Political Reforms: Combating corruption and fortifying democratic institutions will be critical for long-term stability (Hirsch, 2008).

For Russia:

  • Navigating Carefully: While Russia may perceive opportunities in American political fragmentation, overreaching could provoke a robust backlash from the U.S. and its allies, consolidating Western resolve against its interests (Karlsen, 2019; Soldatov & Borogan, 2011).

Ultimately, understanding the interconnectedness of these actions and responses will be critical for navigating the complexities of an increasingly unpredictable geopolitical environment. The stakes are high, and the course chosen now will shape the future of international relations for years to come. The greatest existential danger lies not only in recognizing the threat posed by Russia but also in confronting the internal turmoil that allows such threats to flourish unchecked within the United States.

References

  • Kuchins, A. C., & Zevelev, I. (2011). Russian Foreign Policy: Continuity in Change. The Washington Quarterly.
  • Löfflmann, G. (2019). America First and the Populist Impact on US Foreign Policy. Survival.
  • Rauta, V. (2019). The Russian Bear: Russian Strategic Culture and What it Implies for the West. Connections: The Quarterly Journal.
  • Acharya, A. (2017). After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order. Ethics & International Affairs.
  • Krekola, J., & Mikkonen, S. (2011). Backlash of the Free World: The US Presence at the World Youth Festival in Helsinki, 1962. Scandinavian Journal of History.
  • Elswah, M., & Howard, P. N. (2020). “Anything that Causes Chaos”: The Organizational Behavior of Russia Today (RT). Journal of Communication.
  • Christie, E. H. (2016). The Design and Impact of Western Economic Sanctions against Russia. The RUSI Journal.
  • Bárd, P., & Kochenov, D. (2022). War as a Pretext to Wave the Rule of Law Goodbye? The Case for an EU Constitutional Awakening. European Law Journal.
  • Kisangani, E., & Pickering, J. (2007). The United States and the China Factor: How the U.S. Can Survive in a Rising China’s Sphere of Influence. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs.
  • Porter, R. (2018). The Future of U.S.-China Relations: Is the Thucydides Trap Real? International Studies Perspectives.
  • Nye, J. S. (2019). The Future of Power: The United States and China in the 21st Century. Foreign Affairs.
  • Trubowitz, P., & Harris, R. (2019). The Perils of American Isolationism. The National Interest.
  • Nikonov, D. (2002). Russia’s Foreign Policy: The View from Washington. The New Atlanticist.
  • Hirsch, A. (2008). The New Atlas of Globalization: How the World Is Changing. Globalization Institute.
  • Karlsen, J. (2019). Beyond the Kremlin: Russia’s Influence in the Age of Trump. Global Strategy Journal.
  • Soldatov, A., & Borogan, I. (2011). The New Nobility: The Restoration of Russia’s Security Services. Public Affairs.
  • Shleifer, A., & Treisman, D. (2005). A Normal Country: Russia after Communism. The Brookings Institution.
← Prev Next →