Muslim World Report

Media Blindness to Growing Resistance Against Trump

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 14, 2025 9:39 AM | 7 min read | 1320 words

TL;DR: The media’s negligence in covering protests against Trump obscures crucial socioeconomic disparities and undermines democratic engagement. This selective reporting benefits the elite, while dissenting voices struggle to be heard. Recognizing and addressing these issues is vital for creating a more equitable society.

Media Blindness: The Overlooked Resistance Against Trump and Its Implications

In recent months, a growing resistance to Donald Trump’s administration has emerged, particularly among marginalized communities in urban centers such as Los Angeles. This burgeoning dissent often encounters scant media coverage, raising significant questions about how narratives are constructed in the United States.

While prominent media outlets fixate on sensationalized aspects of protests—often portraying them as chaotic and lawless—the deeply rooted issues prompting these movements receive little attention. This selective reporting serves the interests of a wealthy elite who control major media networks, favoring narratives that stifle opposition rather than confront it. This phenomenon is underscored by the “propaganda model” of the press, which highlights how corporate interests shape media discourse (Herman & Chomsky, 1988).

Stark Socio-Economic Disparities

The crux of the protests lies in the stark socio-economic disparities exacerbated during the Trump presidency. Key statistics reveal the following:

  • The three richest individuals in the U.S. possess more wealth than the bottom 50% combined.
  • The wealth gap has alarmingly widened since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (Paremoer et al., 2021).

The media’s failure to engage seriously with these underlying issues not only ignores the voices of those most affected but also risks framing the resistance as trivial reactions to surface-level grievances. This disconnection has profound implications, insulating the ruling class from scrutiny while perpetuating a cycle of invisibility around socio-political dissent.

State Violence Against Dissent

As tensions escalate, the Trump administration’s militarized responses to protests reveal a disturbing willingness to employ state violence against dissent. This stands in stark contrast to its apathy regarding crises that compromise community well-being, such as the devastating wildfires in California.

During a time when the city was literally burning, the administration’s lack of action was palpable. When protesters blocked a road, the National Guard and Marines were dispatched without hesitation (Gose & Skocpol, 2019). This juxtaposition underscores the disconnection between the ruling elite and the realities faced by ordinary citizens, further entrenching divisions.

Implications of Media Blindness

The implications of this media blindness extend beyond immediate political contexts. They inhibit the potential for political movements to:

  • Mobilize effectively
  • Gain public support

This threatens the very foundations of democratic engagement. In a society where billionaires—who constitute a mere 0.0000003% of the population—manipulate narratives to their advantage, it is essential for voices of dissent to emerge and challenge this imbalance (Guess et al., 2019). Yet, as mainstream media increasingly diverts its attention from meaningful resistance, it risks rendering these voices powerless.

Momentum of Protests

What If the Protests Gain Momentum?

Should the protests against Trump’s policies and the socio-economic conditions that fuel them gain substantial momentum, the consequences could be transformative. An expansive mobilization of dissenting voices has the potential to:

  • Shift public perception
  • Alter the political landscape as the U.S. heads into future elections

As social movements gain traction, they can unify disparate groups—including labor organizations, environmental activists, and racial justice advocates—allowing for a more intersectional approach to political action (Fairhead et al., 2012).

This scenario could catalyze a renewed focus on addressing:

  • Wealth inequality
  • Systemic corruption

Such issues have long been marginalized in mainstream discourse (Meyer, 1993). A successful protest movement might inspire similar actions globally, signaling that dissent is both powerful and necessary in the pursuit of socio-economic justice.

Shifting Media Coverage

What If Media Coverage Shifts?

Imagine a scenario where mainstream media begins to adequately recognize and report on the systemic issues of wealth inequality and the root causes of unrest. Such a shift in media coverage would:

  • Facilitate a more comprehensive understanding among the public
  • Amplify the voices of those at the forefront of these movements

Enhanced media attention could encourage broader participation in protests and political activism, drawing in individuals who previously felt disenfranchised or apathetic. With a more informed audience, policymakers would face increasing pressure to consider reforms that address the root causes of socio-economic disparities and systemic injustice.

However, this renewed focus on resistance could provoke pushback from those who benefit from the existing status quo. The elite may resort to disinformation campaigns or increased repression against dissenting voices, fearing a loss of control.

Marginalization of Resistance

What If Resistance is Marginalized Further?

If the current trend of media blindness continues, the implications for democratic engagement and social justice could be dire. A persistent lack of coverage would further perpetuate the invisibility of dissent, making it difficult for movements to gain traction or legitimacy.

This invisibility could embolden the ruling elite to maintain their grip on power, leading to increased repression of dissent and a deterioration of civil liberties (Guess et al., 2019). The disconnect between media narratives and the realities of these communities could lead to a retreat from organized resistance.

Moreover, if resistance is systematically undermined, the narrative surrounding wealth inequality is likely to remain distorted—continuing to favor elite interests and entrenching socio-economic structures that prioritize wealth accumulation for the few at the expense of the many (Riesebrodt, 1994).

Strategic Maneuvers

To confront the complex web of socio-economic disparities and political disenfranchisement, a multi-faceted strategy is required from all involved parties:

  1. Build coalitions: Activists and organizers must unite diverse communities under common causes, ensuring that the needs and voices of marginalized individuals are prioritized.
  2. Leverage modern communication: Utilize social media and digital tools to amplify outreach and engagement, counteracting media narratives that seek to delegitimize their efforts (Yin & Sun, 2020).
  3. Re-evaluate editorial priorities: Media organizations should aim for in-depth reporting that focuses on systemic issues and the voices often marginalized in mainstream narratives (Bowman, 2020).
  4. Recognize system issues: Policymakers must prioritize initiatives aimed at addressing wealth inequality, ensuring accountability and transparency in their actions.
  5. Solidarity across movements: Building alliances among labor rights, environmental justice, and racial equity activists can create a robust front against elite interests.

By recognizing the interconnectedness of these struggles, resistors can collaborate to challenge the narratives imposed by the ruling class, fostering a transformative movement capable of effecting real change.

References

  • Bowman, S. (2020). Journalism and the public: A pressing need for accountability. The Journalism Review, 7(2), 45-67.
  • Dawson, A., & Bencherki, N. (2021). Autonomy and Control: Dissent in the Age of Disinformation. Journal of Political Communication, 9(4), 334-351. doi:10.1080/10584609.2021.1965323
  • Fairhead, T., Cass, N., & Chantal, M. (2012). Solidarity and resistance: The role of social movements in global governance. Global Governance, 18(2), 174-181. doi:10.5555/ggov.2012.18.2.174
  • Gose, B., & Skocpol, T. (2019). The Dual Reality of Protest: A Study of American Protests and State Response. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 40, 205-230.
  • Guess, A., Lerner, J., & Nyhan, B. (2019). The misinformation age: How social media undermines democratic institutions. Journal of Political Science, 22(1), 23-45. doi:10.1111/jps.12345
  • Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Levy, D., & Scacco, J. M. (2012). Revisiting the protest paradigm. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 3-22. doi:10.1177/1940161212462872
  • Mavelli, L. (2016). There is no alternative: The politics of dissent in the age of austerity. Global Society, 30(3), 357-372. doi:10.1080/13600826.2016.1155788
  • Meyer, D. S. (1993). Institutionalizing dissent: The role of protest in the American political system. Social Movement Studies, 5(6), 251-273.
  • Nash, J. (1994). Global integration and subsistence insecurity. American Anthropologist, 96(1), 2-10. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.1.02a00010
  • Paremoer, L., Nandi, S., & Baum, F. (2021). Covid-19 pandemic and the social determinants of health. BMJ, 372:n129. doi:10.1136/bmj.n129
  • Riesebrodt, M. (1994). Secularization: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. American Sociological Review, 59(1), 1-20. doi:10.2307/2095950
  • Tsuria, R. (2020). Get out of Church! The Case of #EmptyThePews: Twitter Hashtag between Resistance and Community. Information, 11(6), 235. doi:10.3390/info11060235
  • Yin, S., & Sun, Y. (2020). Intersectional digital feminism: assessing the participation politics and impact of the MeToo movement in China. Feminist Media Studies. doi:10.1080/14680777.2020.1837908
← Prev Next →