Muslim World Report

America's Authoritarian Drift: A Call to Action from Scholars

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 23, 2025 9:36 PM | 7 min read | 1377 words

TL;DR: The United States is rapidly slipping into authoritarianism, undermining its own democratic values and institutions. This alarming trend requires immediate, collective action from citizens, political leaders, and media institutions. By fostering grassroots mobilization and accountability, we can resist this drift and safeguard democracy.

The Authoritarian Turn: An Urgent Call for Reflection and Action

As hundreds of scholars assert, the United States is not merely sliding towards authoritarianism but is rather accelerating towards it. This alarming trajectory demands that we confront its profound implications, not only for American society but also for the international community that has historically viewed the U.S. as a beacon of democracy and human rights. This growing critique questions the legitimacy of the foundational ideals of democracy and freedom that the United States has long championed (Levitsky & Way, 2002; Schmitter & Karl, 1991).

Key Issues at Play

  • Governance issues
  • Systemic inequality
  • Pervasive distrust in institutions

In a global context, the rise of internal authoritarianism in the U.S. presents a double-edged sword: it erodes the moral authority of the nation to critique others while simultaneously undermining international democratic standards (Fox, 1994; Jobson, 2020). As scholars note, the internal descent into authoritarianism could embolden other nations to adopt similar trajectories, exacerbating existing governance trends that favor autocratic rule over democratic accountability (Diamond, 1994; Fox, 1994).

Implications

  • Domestic: Erosion of individual liberties and civil rights.
  • International: Hindrance in cooperation on crucial issues like climate change, health security, and socio-economic inequalities (Schmitter & Karl, 1991; Remmer, 1990).

Furthermore, the role of mainstream media in perpetuating narratives that serve the ruling elite cannot be overlooked. Many media institutions have been criticized for their sensationalism and complacency, which risks normalizing authoritarian practices and further alienating the citizenry (Vos et al., 2011; Habermas, 2006).

Media’s Impact

  • Failure to fulfill public watchdog role
  • Leading to unchecked abuses of power and marginalized dissent (Moustafa, 2014; Maréchal, 2017)

The urgency for a more solution-oriented media landscape is palpable, and it is essential to envision strategies that counter these narratives and uplift the voices of the marginalized.

What If Authoritarianism Becomes Institutionalized?

Should the current trajectory of authoritarianism solidify into formal institutions, the ramifications for American society could be dire. Institutionalized authoritarianism often entails the dismantlement of checks and balances that have historically safeguarded against absolute power (Levitsky & Way, 2002).

Possible Manifestations

  • Repressive laws aimed at suppressing dissent
  • Curtailing press freedoms
  • Limiting rights to assemble

Such a climate not only undermines civil liberties but also normalizes surveillance and monitoring practices that intrude upon personal freedoms (Kriesi, 2014).

Consequences for Civil Society

  • Fractured civil society
  • Vulnerability of organizations advocating for human rights and social justice (Foley & Edwards, 1996; Cawthra & Luckman, 2004)

In such an environment, dissent becomes dangerous, leaving individuals and organizations that challenge the status quo at the mercy of authoritarian regimes. This could foster a culture of fear, wherein citizens are dissuaded from voicing their opinions or mobilizing for change, further entrenching authoritarian practices.

Global Dynamics

The consequences could reshape governance dynamics in allied nations. As the U.S. moves away from democratic ideals, other governments may feel empowered to adopt similar authoritarian practices, worsening international relations and retreating from cooperative frameworks essential for addressing transnational challenges (Guarneros‐Meza & Geddes, 2010; Maréchal, 2017).

What If the Media Fails to Challenge Authoritarianism?

If mainstream media remains complicit or ineffective in confronting authoritarianism, we may witness a further deterioration of democratic accountability.

Potential Outcomes

  • Propagation of narratives that legitimize authoritarian practices
  • A state-controlled narrative that stifles dissent and homogenizes public opinion (Vos et al., 2011; Habermas, 2006)

The implications of a failing media extend throughout society. In such a context, the responsibility falls upon alternative media outlets, academia, and grassroots organizations to bridge the gaps left by mainstream journalism. Independent investigative journalism, digital activism, and community-led initiatives must work together to ensure that diverse narratives are accessible and that accountability is restored.

Challenges with Social Media

  • Potential for misinformation and disinformation
  • Authoritarian regimes may exploit social media to spread propaganda

This situation complicates the battle for truth in the digital age, further confusing the public and eroding trust in legitimate news sources.

What If Communities Mobilize Against Authoritarianism?

On the other hand, should communities across the United States rise to resist authoritarianism, the results could be transformative. Grassroots mobilization could reinvigorate democratic engagement and foster an environment where citizens reclaim their agency.

Benefits of Community Mobilization

  • Building coalitions across diverse communities
  • Prompting a reevaluation of policy priorities towards social justice and equity (Hale, 1997; Cawthra & Luckman, 2004)

This scenario encourages an epistemic shift in how society understands and discusses democracy, prioritizing inclusive dialogue and innovative strategies for political engagement (Poynting & Mason, 2006; Moustafa, 2014).

Challenges Ahead

Well-funded and entrenched interests may push back against grassroots movements. Therefore, building strategic alliances with established civil rights organizations and leveraging public platforms to amplify dissenting voices becomes crucial. The potential for robust grassroots resistance hinges on solidarity, collective action, and a steadfast commitment to uphold democratic principles (Hartmann et al., 1996; Diamond, 1994).

Strategic Maneuvers for All Players Involved

In response to the specter of authoritarianism, strategic maneuvers are essential for all stakeholders, including civil society, political leaders, and media institutions.

Citizens

  • Prioritize community mobilization
  • Engage in local governance and advocacy against oppressive policies (Bennett, 2012; Moustafa, 2014)

Political Leaders

  • Commit to upholding civic freedoms, transparency, and accountability
  • Implement legislative reforms for participatory governance and civil liberties (Benton, 2016; Guarneros‐Meza & Geddes, 2010)

Media Institutions

  • Provide accurate, comprehensive reporting
  • Emphasize investigative journalism that exposes corruption and authoritarian practices (Cawthra & Luckman, 2004; Jobson, 2020)

Finally, engaging in critical conversations about democracy’s nature and the threats posed by authoritarianism will be imperative for scholars and civil society leaders. Initiatives fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and open debates can facilitate a deeper understanding of these challenges, ultimately motivating collective action (Levitsky & Way, 2002; Diamond, 2004).

Conclusion

The collective action of communities, the accountability of political leaders, and the vigilance of a free press will ultimately determine the trajectory of democracy in the United States and beyond as we face this pivotal moment in history.

References

  • Benton, A. (2016). The Role of Media in Politics: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Communication Research.

  • Cawthra, G., & Luckman, S. (2004). Building Civil Society: Strengthening Citizen Advocacy and Engagement. Civic Engagement Research.

  • Diamond, L. (1994). Towards Democratic Renewal: The Challenge of the 21st Century. Journal of Democracy.

  • Diamond, L. (2004). What Is Democracy?. The Journal of Democracy.

  • Diamond, L. (2010). The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World. Times Books.

  • Fox, J. (1994). Democracy in the Americas: A Comparative Perspective. Latin American Politics and Society.

  • Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1996). The Paradox of Civil Society. Journal of Democracy.

  • Guarneros‐Meza, V., & Geddes, B. (2010). Democratization and the Future of the Mexican State. Comparative Political Studies.

  • Hale, H. E. (1997). Collective Action, Social Movements, and the Problem of the ‘Post-Communist’ State. Comparative Politics.

  • Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Care?. Media, Culture & Society.

  • Hartmann, T., McCoy, J., & Zeller, S. (1996). Grassroots Movements and the American Left. Social Movement Studies.

  • Jobson, L. (2020). The Erosion of Democratic Norms and the Role of the Media. Journal of Media Studies.

  • Kriesi, H. (2014). The Political Mobilization of the Unemployed in the United States. American Politics Research.

  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2002). The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy.

  • Lipman, C. (2013). The Impact of Media on Political Engagement and Public Responsibility. Political Communication Research.

  • Moustafa, T. (2014). The Politics of Social Movements in the United States. American Journal of Political Science.

  • Maréchal, M. (2017). Authoritarianism and the Role of Civil Society in Liberal Democracies. Democracy Studies.

  • Poynting, S., & Mason, V. (2006). The Global Rise of Authoritarianism and its Impact on Citizenship. International Journal of Sociology.

  • Remmer, K. L. (1990). Democratic Governance and Economic Crisis in Latin America. Comparative Politics.

  • Schneider, C. (2020). The Media’s Role in Authoritarian Regimes: A Historical Perspective. Media History.

  • Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). What Democracy Is… and Is Not. Journal of Democracy.

  • Vos, T. P., et al. (2011). The Role of the Media in Democratic Societies: An Overview of the Theoretical Landscape. Mass Communication & Society.

← Prev Next →