Muslim World Report

Calls for Impeachment Over Trump's Military Strikes in Iran

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 23, 2025 10:08 AM | 7 min read | 1433 words

TL;DR: Former President Trump’s military strikes against Iran have ignited impeachment discussions. Key arguments focus on constitutional violations and the broader implications for U.S. foreign policy. The situation poses risks of escalating conflicts, inspiring global anti-imperialist movements, and raising questions about executive accountability.

The Reckoning Over Iran: Trump’s Military Actions and Their Consequences

The military actions taken by former President Donald Trump against Iran have sparked a contentious debate within U.S. politics, igniting calls for impeachment from factions of the Democratic Party. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has strongly articulated this sentiment, asserting that Trump’s targeted strikes represent a flagrant violation of the Constitution, thus constituting an impeachable offense.

The unilateral nature of these strikes and their potential ramifications for international security raise critical questions regarding:

  • Legality of such military actions
  • Broader implications for U.S. foreign policy
  • Relationships within the Middle East

To understand the stakes involved, it is essential to contextualize Trump’s military decisions within the overarching narrative of American imperialism, which often disregards the sovereignty of nations like Iran. Historically, the U.S. has pursued a foreign policy that prioritizes its own strategic interests at the expense of regional stability, often leading to military interventions that exacerbate global tensions (Mearsheimer, 2019). Given Iran’s geopolitical significance, any military aggression risks inflaming hostilities, potentially inducing wider conflicts that could destabilize U.S.-Iran relations and heighten anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world (Ogbodo et al., 2020).

This reality highlights a profound political divide within the United States, where questions of accountability in governance are increasingly prevalent. The failure to take decisive action against a president for alleged misconduct raises serious concerns about democratic integrity, especially in an era where executive overreach has become normalized (McHugh, 2021).

The repercussions of Trump’s actions are likely to reverberate through the international community. Observers suggest that such strikes might:

  • Embolden other authoritarian regimes to adopt aggressive military tactics
  • Inspire anti-imperialist movements globally, framing these actions as emblematic of Western interventionist policies

What If Congress Moves to Impeach?

Should Congress embark on impeachment proceedings against Trump based on his military actions in Iran, it would mark a significant moment in U.S. governance. A successful impeachment could:

  • Galvanize public sentiment
  • Invigorate an anti-imperialist narrative challenging American exceptionalism (Himmelstein & Woolhandler, 2021)
  • Affirm the principle that executive actions—particularly those involving military force—must remain within legal and constitutional boundaries (Weible et al., 2020)

However, the current political landscape complicates this scenario. With the Republican Party dominating the Senate, the likelihood of a successful conviction remains slim. This grim reality could further polarize political discourse, deepening the divide between parties. A failed impeachment could:

  • Embolden Trump, reinforcing his belief in the impunity of aggressive foreign policies
  • Perpetuate the notion that U.S. foreign policy is free from adequate oversight, leading to increased military actions in the region and potentially igniting larger conflicts (Mearsheimer, 2019)

The implications of a congressional impeachment effort are profound. If successful, impeachment could signify that the collective will of Congress can indeed check executive power, leading to:

  • A resurgence of civic engagement
  • Greater scrutiny of unilateral military actions
  • A more democratic discourse regarding foreign policy

Conversely, a failed impeachment could solidify Trump’s base, emboldening his administration’s hawkish stance on foreign policy and setting a dangerous precedent for future presidencies. The lack of accountability may embolden other leaders to pursue similarly reckless militaristic agendas, undermining the principles of democracy and international order that many seek to uphold.

What If Iran Responds Militarily?

Another critical aspect to consider is the potential military response from Iran. Should Iran opt for a retaliatory response, it could manifest in various forms, including:

  • Cyberattacks on U.S. infrastructure
  • Proxy assaults on American forces
  • Direct military confrontations (Divsallar, 2023)

The implications of Iran’s military response extend beyond immediate geopolitical tensions; they could ignite broader regional conflicts and foster a unified stance among various Muslim-majority nations against perceived U.S. aggression. Such a coalition may catalyze new anti-war movements globally, as citizens react to what they view as unjust U.S. foreign policies. The humanitarian consequences of any military escalation are mounting, as civilian populations invariably bear the brunt of conflict (Mearsheimer, 2019).

Iran’s military strategies would likely be multifaceted, possibly opting for asymmetric warfare tactics by leveraging regional influence through proxy groups such as Hezbollah or militias in Iraq for indirect attacks against U.S. interests. Cyber warfare could also serve as a vital tool, targeting U.S. infrastructure and creating significant disruptions.

In this scenario, the potential severity of the conflict escalates, leading to a protracted confrontation with devastating consequences for civilians across the region.

The international response to an Iranian military retaliation would be equally significant. Global powers may find themselves compelled to intervene or mediate, while regional allies of the U.S. might reassess their positions based on unfolding dynamics. The potential for a wider regional war, involving key players like Russia and China, remains a real concern. An escalated conflict could adversely affect global oil markets, exacerbating economic challenges and destabilizing global economies already strained by geopolitical tensions.

What If Trump’s Actions Inspire Global Anti-Imperialist Movements?

The most profound long-term consequence of Trump’s military actions in Iran may be the revitalization of anti-imperialist sentiments worldwide. Should citizen activism effectively mobilize against U.S. aggression, it could shift prevailing perceptions of U.S. interventionism, advocating for a foreign policy that respects national sovereignty (Weible et al., 2020).

If this scenario materializes, we could witness a resurgence of solidarity among various anti-imperialist movements, leading to coordinated actions that challenge the status quo of imperialism (Bazian, 2018). In response, the U.S. government might:

  • Engage in more aggressive military posturing
  • Attempt to reshape international narratives through diplomatic efforts

However, the challenge remains to ensure that rhetoric aligns with actions (Himmelstein & Woolhandler, 2021).

The potential for a global anti-imperialist movement to gain traction is significant, particularly in an era marked by increasing global connectivity. Digital platforms facilitate the exchange of ideas, allowing activists to share strategies and mobilize support across borders. This interconnectedness can enhance the effectiveness of grassroots campaigns, underscoring the need for a united opposition to imperialist policies.

Internationally, a reinvigorated global stance against imperialism could reshape political narratives and outcomes, inspiring younger generations to engage in activism prioritizing peace, justice, and respect for sovereignty.

Strategic Maneuvers: Actions for All Players

Navigating the fallout from Trump’s military decisions regarding Iran requires strategic consideration from all involved parties:

  • U.S. Government: A recalibration of foreign policy to prioritize diplomacy over military action is critical. Renewing negotiations with Iran could lead to de-escalation and reestablish multilateral dialogue rooted in international law (Himmelstein & Woolhandler, 2021).

  • Congress: Particularly the Democratic Party, must unite around a coherent strategy that challenges executive overreach and prioritizes accountability. Calls for greater oversight on military actions and holding hearings into Trump’s conduct could help restore essential checks and balances in U.S. foreign policy (McHugh, 2021).

  • Iran: Should weigh its options carefully. An aggressive military response could lead to contentious fallout. Instead, Iran could bolster its non-military strategies to counter U.S. aggression, such as strengthening alliances within the region and engaging in public diplomacy (Divsallar, 2023).

  • Global Community: Especially Muslim-majority nations, should advocate for a united front emphasizing the sovereignty of nations over imperialist ambitions.

In summary, the stakes surrounding Trump’s military actions in Iran are substantial. The decisions made within this context will profoundly shape not only U.S. foreign policy but also the dynamics of power and resistance on the global stage for years to come. The dialogue surrounding these actions must continue, recognizing the complex interplay of domestic pressures and international relations that will influence outcomes for all parties involved.

References

  • Bazian, H. (2018). Islamophobia, “Clash of Civilizations”, and Forging a Post-Cold War Order!. Religions, 9(9), 282.
  • Divsallar, A. (2023). The Militarization of Iran’s Perception of Saudi Arabia. The Muslim World.
  • Himmelstein, D. U., & Woolhandler, S. (2021). Recovering from Trump: Biden’s first 100 days. The Lancet, 397, 705-753.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order. International Security, 43(4), 7-50.
  • McHugh, K. (2021). At War with Congress: War Powers Disputes during the Trump Administration. Democracy and Security, 17(1), 20-34.
  • Weible, C. M., et al. (2020). COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives. Policy Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4
← Prev Next →