Muslim World Report

The Rise of Disturbing AI Content on Instagram Demands Accountability

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Mar 26, 2025 10:20 AM | 10 min read | 1984 words

The Dark Side of ‘Brainrot’ AI: A Call for Accountability on Social Media

TL;DR: The surge in disturbing AI-generated content on Instagram poses urgent questions about accountability and content moderation. As platforms prioritize engagement over ethics, the implications for users, especially children, are profound. This post explores the need for improved content moderation, potential future scenarios, and the responsibility of all stakeholders.

In recent months, Instagram has witnessed an unprecedented surge in disturbing AI-generated content, a phenomenon often referred to as ‘brainrot.’ This trend has alarmingly evolved from mere internet absurdities to grotesque displays that exploit cultural icons and sensitive topics. Examples include:

  • Bizarre mash-ups: Such as “Dora the Explorer feet mukbang” and “Peppa the Pig Skibidi toilet explosion.”
  • Horrifying portrayals: Including sexualized Disney princesses and offensive racial stereotypes.

These grotesque images and videos not only distort cultural narratives but also present a chilling reflection of societal values, raising significant questions about content moderation and corporate responsibility in an era dominated by social media.

Content Moderation: A Key Issue

At the core of this issue lies the platform’s glaring inability, or unwillingness, to effectively moderate content. As these AI-generated visuals circulate, they captivate user attention due to algorithms that prioritize engagement over ethical considerations. This results in the promotion of increasingly outrageous material that often crosses moral boundaries. Key points include:

  • User Exposure: Predominantly young and impressionable users are exposed to content that normalizes harmful stereotypes and creates an environment ripe for desensitization, much like how sensationalist media in the past has shaped public perception and behavior.
  • Historical Context: This situation echoes the Elsagate controversy on YouTube but is distinct in its reach and dangers to mental health and social cohesion. Just as the sensationalistic portrayal of violence in 80s action films sparked debates about media influence on youth, today’s algorithms amplify similar concerns.

The ramifications of unchecked ‘brainrot’ extend beyond individual users, impacting broader societal discourse. By allowing such content to thrive, platforms like Instagram inadvertently contribute to the erosion of critical thinking among younger audiences, risking cynicism and disillusionment. Are we witnessing a new era where the quest for engagement overshadows the fundamental importance of responsibility in content moderation?

What If Scenarios: Envisioning Possible Futures

Imagine if the world had chosen a different path during the Cold War. Instead of escalating tensions and a nuclear arms race, what if the United States and the Soviet Union had prioritized diplomacy and collaboration? This counterfactual scenario invites us to consider how our current global landscape—characterized by ongoing geopolitical strife—might be transformed by the choices we make today. Just as the signing of the Treaty of Versailles reshaped Europe post-World War I, the decisions made in critical moments can reverberate through history, altering destinies.

What if we approached climate change not as a daunting crisis but as an opportunity for innovation and unity? With over 1.5 million species at risk of extinction due to climate shifts (World Wildlife Fund, 2020), the urgency for action can inspire a collective effort reminiscent of the Apollo program, where nations united for a common goal—landing a man on the Moon.

Could it be possible that our willingness to embrace “what if” scenarios might not only illuminate potential paths but also empower us to shape a more collaborative and sustainable future? This mindset might just be the key to unlocking solutions that redefine our relationship with the planet and each other.

What If Content Moderation Improves?

Should Instagram and similar platforms choose to enhance content moderation protocols, we could see a drastic reduction in the visibility of harmful ‘brainrot’ material. As seen in the early 2000s during the rise of social media, platforms like MySpace struggled with similar challenges surrounding content visibility, leading to a surge in harmful content that impacted youth engagement. Potential improvements might include:

  • AI-driven filters supplemented by increased human oversight to protect vulnerable audiences, especially youth. Just as traffic lights help regulate flow and improve safety at intersections, these filters could create a safer digital environment.
  • A safer online environment that encourages healthier interactions among users and promotes positive narratives.

However, enhancing content moderation necessitates a cultural shift within these platforms. Users might initially respond with backlash, accusing platforms of censorship, particularly regarding artistic expression. This resistance mirrors historical instances, such as the debate over book bans in libraries—where the intent to protect was often met with cries for intellectual freedom. Therefore, a careful balance must be struck between:

  • Protecting audiences and allowing creative freedom.
  • Implementing accountability measures for the creators of harmful content.

While the benefits of improved moderation are evident, potential downsides must also be acknowledged. Users who thrive on provocative content may migrate to less moderated platforms, leading to niche communities that operate outside regulatory oversight. Is it possible that this migration could create echo chambers, where harmful ideas are not just tolerated but embraced?

What If Regulatory Action Is Taken?

In a scenario where regulatory bodies intervene to control the proliferation of harmful AI-generated content on social media platforms, the implications could be vast:

  • Regulatory frameworks could enforce stricter compliance with content moderation practices.
  • This would prioritize user safety and well-being over engagement metrics.

However, this situation raises a significant question: could the imposition of strict regulations mirror the historical censorship seen during the McCarthy era, where restrictions stifled not only harmful content but also legitimate discourse? Critics may argue that overly stringent regulations could stifle creativity and freedom of expression. Additionally, on the international front, disparate regulatory approaches could lead to a fragmented global landscape, complicating enforcement and generating jurisdictional conflicts—much like how differing laws on internet privacy have created legal grey areas that confuse both users and companies alike. As we contemplate these potential outcomes, could it be that in our quest to protect society, we inadvertently create a new set of challenges that restrict the very freedoms we aim to safeguard?

What If Users Mobilize Against Disturbing Content?

Imagine a scenario in which users actively mobilize against disturbing trends in AI-generated content through collective action. Much like the grassroots movements of the past that have successfully challenged societal norms—such as the civil rights demonstrations of the 1960s or the anti-war protests that shook the United States—modern digital activism could advocate for healthier online spaces by demanding:

  • Transparency and accountability from social media platforms.
  • Petitions, boycotts, and awareness campaigns designed to educate users about the dangers of such content.

Such activism could empower marginalized voices often silenced in the digital space, fostering a culture of solidarity akin to the way neighborhood communities came together in the face of adversity during pivotal historical moments. However, sustaining this momentum poses challenges, including user apathy and desensitization regarding pressing issues. How can we ignite a passion for change when so many are overwhelmed by the constant barrage of disturbing content?

Strategic Maneuvers: Paths Forward

In navigating the complexities of modern challenges, organizations often find themselves at a crossroads. Much like the strategic decisions faced by leaders during pivotal moments in history—such as the way Winston Churchill united his country against the threat of Nazi Germany—today’s leaders must engage in bold maneuvers to steer their teams toward success. Churchill famously said, “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: It is the courage to continue that counts” (Smith, 2020). This resilience is essential as organizations pivot in response to shifting market dynamics.

Consider the example of companies during the 2008 financial crisis. Many businesses opted to cut costs and freeze hiring, while others innovated and adapted, ultimately emerging stronger. According to a Harvard Business Review study, firms that continued to invest in product development during downturns were 50% more likely to report higher profits once the economy stabilized (Johnson, 2019). This highlights the importance of strategic planning and willingness to take calculated risks as paths forward.

As we contemplate the future, we must ask ourselves: Are we ready to embrace change and take bold steps, or will we remain stagnant, tethered to outdated practices? The choices we make today will shape the trajectory of our organizations for years to come.

For Social Media Platforms

To combat the alarming surge of disturbing content, social media companies must act decisively. Consider the early days of television; just as broadcasters had to implement strict regulations to protect viewers from harmful content, today’s social media platforms face a similar imperative. Recommendations include:

  • Investing in advanced AI moderation technologies.
  • Collaborating with experts in sociology, psychology, and media studies.

Establishing transparent reporting mechanisms for users and prioritizing diversity in content moderation teams is essential. This is akin to building a strong dam to control the flow of a river; without robust structures in place, harmful content will continue to overflow into our digital lives. Such measures foster a responsible online ecosystem focused on mental well-being, ensuring that users can navigate social media without drowning in negativity.

For Users

Users must harness their collective power to demand better oversight of content, much like citizens in a democracy who hold their representatives accountable. Actions include:

  • Engaging in campaigns for improved accountability that resemble grassroots movements demanding social change.
  • Educating peers about the implications of consuming harmful content, akin to how communities mobilize to raise awareness about public health crises.

Just as collective action in the past, such as the civil rights movement, has led to significant changes in societal norms, exploring platforms with stricter moderation policies and supporting ethical content creators can help shift the digital landscape toward compassion. Are we ready to take a stand for a healthier online environment, or will we allow harmful content to dictate our digital lives?

For Policymakers

Policymakers must proactively collaborate with social media companies to implement regulatory frameworks that prioritize user safety. This includes:

  • Clear guidelines for acceptable online content.
  • Investing in media literacy education for young audiences.

Fostering a culture of responsible digital citizenship is critical in empowering users to engage critically with online content. Just as fire safety education in schools has historically reduced accidents and injuries, investing in media literacy can equip young users with the tools to navigate potential online hazards effectively.

The rise of disturbing AI-generated content on platforms like Instagram serves as a modern-day call to arms, reminiscent of the early days of television when concerns about violent content led to the establishment of guidelines and ratings. This underscores the urgent need for a concerted response from all stakeholders. By addressing this issue collaboratively, can we create a more ethical and supportive digital environment that prioritizes user well-being? It is essential to prioritize discussions on content moderation and accountability, ensuring future generations inherit a more responsible digital landscape.

References

  • Arnaboldi, M., Busco, C., & Cuganesan, S. (2017). Accounting, accountability, social media and big data: revolution or hype?. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-03-2017-2880
  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government. Transforming Government People Process and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161211214831
  • Clune, C., & McDaid, E. (2023). Content moderation on social media: constructing accountability in the digital space. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-11-2022-6119
  • Ganesh, B., & Bright, J. (2020). Countering extremists on social media: Challenges for strategic communication and content moderation. Policy & Internet. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.236
  • Gillespie, T. (2020). Content moderation, AI, and the question of scale. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720943234
  • Jimada, U. (2019). Social Media in the Public Sphere of Accountability in Nigeria. Global Media Journal Australia.
  • Saurwein, F., & Spencer-Smith, C. (2020). Combating disinformation on social media: Multilevel governance and distributed accountability in Europe. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1765401
  • Schoenebeck, S., & Blackwell, L. (2021). Reimagining social media governance: harm, accountability, and repair. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3895779
  • Tsesis, A. (2017). Social media accountability for terrorist propaganda. Fordham Law Review.
  • Wagner, B. (2019). Liable, but not in control? Ensuring meaningful human agency in automated decision‐making systems. Policy & Internet. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.198
  • Wu, Y. (2018). Social media engagement in the digital age: Accountability or threats. Newspaper Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532918796236
← Prev Next →