Muslim World Report

India Cuts Ties with Bangladesh Amid Growing Geopolitical Strains

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 21, 2025 10:18 AM | 7 min read | 1370 words

TL;DR: India has cut off Bangladesh’s access to its ports, escalating regional tensions just as the U.S. imposes high tariffs on Bangladeshi goods. This complex geopolitical scenario raises questions about trade, sovereignty, and the future of Bangladesh’s economic partnerships, particularly regarding its ties with China.

Reshaping Geopolitical Dynamics: India-Bangladesh Tensions and the Implications of Strategic Alignments

On April 8, 2023, India imposed a significant ban on Bangladesh, restricting its access to Indian ports and airports for cargo trans-shipment. This unexpected move signals rising tensions between the two countries and underscores the complexities of regional geopolitics, particularly in light of Bangladesh’s growing relationship with China. The ban follows disparaging remarks from Bangladeshi officials who have openly dismissed India’s interests in the Northeast region, further exacerbating bilateral relations (Hossain & Islam, 2021).

This decision comes at a precarious time for Bangladesh, grappling with economic challenges exacerbated by the United States’ recent imposition of a 36% tariff on Bangladeshi goods. This dual pressure from India and the U.S. threatens to destabilize an economy that heavily relies on exports and Indian logistical infrastructure (Islam, 2018). The implications of this ban extend beyond immediate economic concerns; they raise critical questions about sovereignty, national security, and regional integration in an increasingly multipolar world.

India’s actions appear to align with its long-standing ambition to assert dominance in the Bay of Bengal, a strategically vital area for maritime trade. By restricting Bangladesh’s access to essential logistical routes, India signals its intent to recalibrate the regional balance of power amid China’s expanding influence (Chung, 2017). For Bangladesh, this ban could precipitate severe economic repercussions, potentially fostering new alliances that may shift the landscape of South Asian geopolitics.

The Complex Dynamics of International Trade

The intricate dynamics of international trade underpinning this conflict cannot be overlooked. The U.S. tariffs exacerbate Bangladesh’s economic challenges, potentially compelling Dhaka to seek alternative markets more aggressively (Rather & Gupta, 2014). Should Bangladesh pivot towards China, the implications could be significant, potentially altering trade dynamics in South Asia and increasing Bangladesh’s vulnerability to Chinese political and economic leverage. This necessitates a careful examination of Bangladesh’s future economic strategies and the long-term viability of its trade partnerships.

What if Bangladesh turns to alternative economic partners?

  • Closer ties with China: A pivot towards China could transform trade dynamics within South Asia, providing Bangladesh with necessary logistical and financial support through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (Paprocki & Cons, 2014).
  • Erosion of sovereignty: Increased dependency on China may compel Bangladesh to align more closely with Chinese political ideologies, limiting its ability to navigate foreign policy independently (Gul & Yasin, 2011).

The consequences of increased dependency on China could be twofold: while it may offer short-term economic relief, it may also compel Bangladesh to align more closely with Chinese political ideologies, potentially compromising its economic autonomy and regional stability.

What if India’s ban backfires?

The potential for India’s ban to backfire cannot be overlooked. If Bangladesh successfully mobilizes alternative trade routes and partners, India’s strategy may inadvertently galvanize a stronger regional coalition against its interests.

  • A united front: Bangladesh could forge stronger ties with nations like Pakistan and China, presenting a direct challenge to India’s regional hegemony (Datta, 2002).
  • Economic repercussions: A diversification of Bangladesh’s trade partnerships may lead to reduced access for Indian exporters, particularly in sectors like textiles where Bangladesh holds a competitive edge (Rather & Gupta, 2014).

Furthermore, a backlash in popular sentiment within Bangladesh could foster anti-India protests and political instability, complicating diplomatic relations and diminishing India’s standing as a regional leader. The long-term fallout from this could lead to a reconfiguration of alliances that increasingly isolates India on the international stage.

What if external actors intervene?

In an interconnected world, external actors such as the United States and the European Union may seek to intervene in the escalating tensions between India and Bangladesh.

  • U.S. strategic interests: The U.S. might leverage tariffs or sanctions against India to pressure New Delhi into reconsidering its ban (Mawdsley, 2010). This could be motivated by concerns over human rights practices or economic fairness.
  • Complicated dynamics: External intervention could either stabilize the situation or catalyze a more significant conflict, depending on how global powers choose to engage with both nations.

This complex web of interactions underscores the precarious nature of regional security and sovereignty, with nations potentially becoming pawns in larger geopolitical games.

Strategic Maneuvers for Stability

To navigate the complexities of the current crisis, all parties involved—India, Bangladesh, and external global players—must consider strategic maneuvers that could mitigate the risks of further escalation and foster stability in the region.

For India

A reconsideration of its strategy vis-à-vis Bangladesh could prove beneficial. Rather than adopting a confrontational posture, India might:

  • Engage in diplomatic negotiations aimed at addressing underlying issues, such as trade imbalances and regional security concerns (Kumar, 2019).
  • Explore ways to enhance infrastructure connectivity projects that directly benefit Bangladesh, solidifying its position as a vital economic partner rather than a confrontational neighbor.

By initiating conversations with Bangladeshi officials and establishing a framework for dialogue, India can lead to mutual concessions that benefit both nations.

For Bangladesh

Bangladesh must pursue a multifaceted approach in response to this escalation. Strategies may include:

  • Developing new trade partners, especially to the north and east.
  • Strengthening its domestic market to reduce dependency on any single partner—be it India or China.
  • Engaging with regional organizations, such as the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC), to solidify alternative partnerships (Rather & Gupta, 2014).

Employing soft diplomacy to communicate concerns regarding India’s actions may help foster a more cooperative relationship with New Delhi. Confidence-building measures can demonstrate Bangladesh’s commitment to regional stability.

For External Actors

External actors, particularly the U.S. and the EU, have a critical role in moderating tensions. They should:

  • Prioritize stability in South Asia by encouraging dialogue between India and Bangladesh.
  • Provide economic support to Bangladesh to offset the negative repercussions of U.S. tariffs and India’s ban.

Fostering an environment where dialogue is prioritized over confrontation may lead to a more stable and prosperous South Asian region.

Conclusion

The evolving situation between India and Bangladesh presents a complex interplay of economic interests, geopolitical maneuvering, and regional stability. As these nations grapple with hegemonic ambitions and external pressures, proactive diplomacy, regional integration, and economic cooperation will be pivotal in fostering a more peaceful and equitable future.

The implications of India’s ban on Bangladesh echo far beyond the immediate economic impacts; they resonate throughout the South Asian region, reshaping alliances, trade dynamics, and geopolitical strategies. The resolution of tensions between these two nations may serve as a barometer for broader geopolitical trends in South Asia.

As nations increasingly recognize the interconnectedness of their economic fates, a collective approach grounded in dialogue and cooperation may pave the way for a more stable regional order.

References:

  • Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household. Feminist Economics.
  • Chung, C.-p. (2017). What are the strategic and economic implications for South Asia of China’s Maritime Silk Road initiative? The Pacific Review.
  • Datta, S. (2002). Indo-Bangladesh relations: An overview of limitations and constraints. Strategic Analysis.
  • Edmonds, E. V., & Pavcnik, N. (2005). Child Labor in the Global Economy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives.
  • Ghosh, S., & Tripathi, D. (2020). India-Bangladesh Relations: Economic and Political Challenges. Journal of South Asian Studies.
  • Gul, N., & Yasin, H. M. (2011). The Trade Potential of Pakistan: An Application of the Gravity Model. The Lahore journal of economics.
  • Hossain, D., & Islam, M. S. (2021). Understanding Bangladesh’s relations with India and China: dilemmas and responses. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region.
  • Kumar, R. (2019). India & South Asia: Geopolitics, regional trade and economic growth spillovers. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development.
  • Mawdsley, E. (2010). Non-DAC donors and the changing landscape of foreign aid: the (in)significance of India’s development cooperation with Kenya. Journal of Eastern African Studies.
  • Rather, Z. A., & Gupta, D. (2014). India-Bangladesh Bilateral Trade: Problems and Prospects. International Affairs and Global Strategy.
  • Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  • Sahoo, P. (2013). Economic Relations with Bangladesh: China’s Ascent and India’s Decline. South Asia Research.
  • Tehseen, M. (2017). Sino-US Competition: Implications for South Asia and the Asia-Pacific. Strategic Studies.
← Prev Next →