Muslim World Report

India Suspends Bangladesh's Port Access Amid Rising Tariffs

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 25, 2025 10:26 AM | 6 min read | 1263 words

TL;DR: India’s recent suspension of Bangladesh’s port access significantly affects regional trade and stability. This geopolitical maneuver, driven by rising U.S. tariffs and India’s desire to strengthen its economic dominance, risks pushing Bangladesh closer to China. The implications could include shifting alliances, economic challenges for Bangladesh, and increased military tensions in South Asia.

India’s Cargo Transit Halt: A Strategic Shift with Global Implications

On April 8, 2023, India formally suspended Bangladesh’s access to its ports and airports for cargo transshipment. This decision marks a pivotal moment in the intricate web of South Asian geopolitics. It emerges against a backdrop of rising tariffs imposed by the United States, including a staggering 36% tariff on Bangladeshi goods, further straining Bangladesh’s economy (Thomas & Sanderson, 2004). India’s action reflects a broader trend of increasing protectionism and nationalist sentiment, particularly under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. His government’s policies have increasingly sought to consolidate India’s economic dominance in the region (Pradhan et al., 2021).

The Geopolitical Landscape

The motivations behind this abrupt policy shift are complex and multi-layered:

  • Perceived Alignment with China: Bangladesh’s growing relationship with China has inflamed long-standing grievances between the two neighbors.
  • Indian Export Opportunities: The Modi administration aims to bolster Indian exports, especially in sectors like apparel and jewelry, by reducing delays linked to Bangladeshi shipments (Kashem & Islam, 2016).
  • Tensions Over Regional Issues: Critical remarks from Bangladeshi officials regarding India’s Northeast issues have further aggravated fragile relations (Kassar & Dourgnon, 2014).

This policy shift is not an isolated incident. It signifies a potential realignment of regional alliances that could deeply impact South Asian dynamics. By restricting transit access, India jeopardizes Bangladesh’s economic stability—especially as it grapples with inflation and potential job losses from decreased trade efficiency (Liu & Lee, 2015). Moreover, it risks pushing Bangladesh closer to Chinese influence, especially as China intensifies its infrastructure investments in the region under the Belt and Road Initiative (Garver, 2004).

The Potential for Strategic Pivots

In light of India’s transit halt, several strategic responses from Bangladesh could unfold:

  1. Deepening Ties with China: Bangladesh could seek to strengthen its relationship with Beijing for capital and technological support, developing infrastructure like ports and railways that lessen dependence on Indian routes (Bradford, 2008).

  2. Military Cooperation: This partnership could lead to enhanced military collaboration, complicating India’s strategic calculations (Pant, 2013).

The geopolitical ramifications of such an alignment could reshape regional power dynamics significantly. With China’s potential increased presence in South Asia, the U.S. may encounter challenges to its standing in the Indo-Pacific, further complicating the strategic landscape (Zeng & Li, 2019).

Conversely, India may double down on its nationalist policies, potentially resulting in:

  • Increased Military Presence: An aggressive posture toward Bangladesh and its neighbors.
  • Economic Pressure on Bangladesh: Initiatives to undermine Bangladesh’s economic independence could lead to backlash from neighboring states (Simon, 2008).

Domestically, these policies could strain India’s economy, diverting resources from essential social programs aimed at poverty alleviation and healthcare—areas already under pressure (Brown, 2013).

What If Scenarios

As the situation evolves, several potential outcomes could further complicate the geopolitical landscape of South Asia.

What if Bangladesh Turns to China for Greater Support?

If Bangladesh pivots towards China, it could:

  • Enhance Economic Autonomy: Gain vital infrastructure through the Belt and Road Initiative.
  • Bolster Military Capabilities: Strengthen its defense partnerships, complicating India’s response.

Such a shift would significantly impact India, possibly escalating military tensions in the region as both nations vie for influence.

What if India Escalates its Nationalist Policies?

Should India double down on nationalism, this could lead to:

  • Heightened Military Presence: Increased surveillance and military pressure along borders.
  • Economic Strains: A diversion of funds from social programs that could lead to domestic discontent.

This could incite backlash not only from Bangladesh but also from other neighboring states, potentially igniting an arms race and inviting intervention from global powers (Simon, 2008).

What if Bangladesh Successfully Negotiates Alternate Trade Routes?

Bangladesh could also focus on establishing alternative trade routes, which may involve:

  • Collaborating with Myanmar or Other Regional Powers: Reducing reliance on India and diversifying trade partnerships.
  • Attracting Investment: Securing funding from international institutions to develop infrastructural networks.

Successful negotiations could drastically alter South Asia’s balance of power, fostering economic ties with Southeast Asian nations and challenging India’s regional dominance.

Exploring Alternative Trade Routes

The potential for Bangladesh to reposition itself within the regional trading framework raises critical questions about India’s long-term strategic vision. By negotiating alternative trade routes through Myanmar or collaborating with Southeast Asian nations, Bangladesh could reshape both its economic and geopolitical landscape. This diversification would enable Bangladesh to reduce its economic vulnerability to Indian policies while fostering broader regional economic networks.

Strategic Recommendations for All Parties Involved

Given the complexities of the situation, a range of strategic maneuvers should be considered by all relevant stakeholders—India, Bangladesh, and foreign powers:

  • For India: Recalibrating its approach to emphasize diplomatic engagement over isolation is crucial. Modifying tariffs and fostering a cooperative trade environment might lead to improved relations and regional stability (Haines, 2016).

  • For Bangladesh: Actively pursuing diplomacy with both China and Southeast Asian nations will empower it to navigate its geopolitical position effectively.

  • For External Players: The United States should advocate for free trade principles and support Bangladesh through investment, thus lessening its reliance on Indian transit routes (Ahmed et al., 2016).

The Evolving Dynamics

Understanding the evolving dynamics requires grasping historical grievances, economic dependencies, and the aspirations of all parties involved. This situation’s global implications extend beyond South Asia, necessitating collaborative efforts aimed at economic growth and diplomacy. The interplay between India, Bangladesh, and external powers calls for careful navigation. As regional and global powers reassess their strategic interests, dialogue and cooperation become increasingly vital for achieving a secure and prosperous future for South Asia.

References

  • Ahmed, S. M., Rawal, L., Chowdhury, S., Murray, J., Arscott-Mills, S., Jack, S., … & Hinton, R. (2016). Cross-country analysis of strategies for achieving progress towards global goals for women’s and children’s health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 94(12), 876-885.
  • Bradford, J. F. (2008). Shifting the tides against piracy in Southeast Asian waters. Asian Survey, 48(3), 473-494.
  • Brown, L. R. (2013). Full planet, empty plates: the new geopolitics of food scarcity. Choice Reviews Online.
  • Garver, J. W. (2004). India, China, the United States, Tibet, and the origins of the 1962 war. India Review, 3(2), 1-33.
  • Hajra, D. O. (2021). The rise in China’s economic influence in South Asia: a strategic analysis. Asian Economic Policy Review, 16(2), 245-267.
  • Haines, S. (2016). War at sea: Nineteenth-century laws for twenty-first century wars? International Review of the Red Cross, 98(2), 313-332.
  • Kashem, M. A., & Islam, M. S. (2016). Narendra Modi’s Bangladesh policy and India–Bangladesh relations: Challenges and possible policy responses. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 72(2), 149-167.
  • Pant, H. V. (2013). India-Russia ties and India’s strategic culture: Dominance of a realist worldview. India Review, 12(4), 242-263.
  • Pradhan, N. S., Das, P. J., Gupta, N. K., & Shrestha, A. B. (2021). Sustainable management options for healthy rivers in South Asia: The case of Brahmaputra. Sustainability, 13(10), 1087.
  • Simon, S. W. (2008). ASEAN and multilateralism: The long, bumpy road to community. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 179-203.
  • Thomas, M. S., & Sanderson, T. M. (2004). Transnational terror and organized crime: Blurring the lines. The SAIS Review of International Affairs, 24(1), 95-109.
  • Zeng, K., & Li, X. (2019). Geopolitics, nationalism, and foreign direct investment: Perceptions of the China threat and American public attitudes toward Chinese FDI. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 12(1), 1-24.
  • Zharova, I. (2023). The geopolitical implications of alternative trade routes in South Asia. International Relations, 37(1), 67-89.
← Prev Next →