Muslim World Report

Navigating Realpolitik in Muslim-Majority Nations Today

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 14, 2025 10:07 AM | 6 min read | 1235 words

TL;DR: The resurgence of Realpolitik significantly impacts Muslim-majority countries, ushering in both challenges and opportunities. This article examines scenarios where these nations navigate pressures, the rise of authoritarianism, and the formation of new alliances, emphasizing the need for strategic responses that prioritize dialogue, solidarity, and grassroots involvement.

The Resurgence of Realpolitik and Its Implications for Muslim-Majority Countries

The Situation

The recent resurgence of Realpolitik in global governance poses significant challenges and opportunities for Muslim-majority countries. As these nations navigate complex international relations amidst changing power dynamics, they find themselves at a critical juncture in history.

Realpolitik—a term emphasizing a pragmatic and strategic approach to politics—has reemerged as a guiding principle in geopolitical discussions, especially in the Middle East and North Africa. This resurgence is shaped by various global challenges, including:

  • Climate change
  • Economic instability
  • The rise of populism

Historically, Realpolitik has thrived in the political landscapes of the Middle East and North Africa. This focus on pragmatic benefits over ideological consistency is reflected in key geopolitical events:

  • The withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan in 2021
  • The ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict
  • Deteriorating relationships between Western nations and Iran

These developments illustrate how Realpolitik shapes the strategic decisions of Muslim-majority nations. For example, the normalization of relations between certain Arab states and Israel is often driven by security and economic opportunity rather than ideological alignment, raising ethical questions regarding Palestinian rights and aspirations (Mahmood, 2006; Hegghammer, 2010).

Additionally, the geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China complicates the strategic landscape. Countries like Pakistan and Malaysia face pressure to align with one superpower, risking their sovereignty. The implications for global Islam and Muslim unity are profound; as Realpolitik often prioritizes national interests, collective Muslim solidarity may become sidelined. This complexity highlights the need for nuanced foreign policy approaches that balance national interests with collective identity (Ayoob, 2002).

Amplifying the voices of ordinary Muslims is imperative in this evolving landscape. Integrating grassroots narratives into broader discussions about national and international policy will enrich discourse and empower local communities seeking justice and representation (Schmidt, 2004).

What if Muslim Countries Unite Against External Pressure?

If Muslim-majority countries present a unified front against external pressures, the global political landscape could experience a transformative shift. Possible outcomes include:

  • A coalition advocating for shared objectives could challenge existing paradigms of Western dominance.
  • Enhanced trade agreements among member states could create a formidable economic bloc capable of countering sanctions and trade barriers imposed by Western powers (Hafez & Mullins, 2015; Atran & Axelrod, 2008).
  • Collective advocacy on pressing issues such as the Palestinian cause, climate change, and defense cooperation would amplify their bargaining power on the world stage.

This scenario also holds potential for revitalizing solidarity among diverse Muslim communities, inspiring grassroots movements advocating for shared values and humanitarian challenges, ultimately transforming global perceptions of Muslims and countering rising Islamophobia (Ibrahim, 2015; Cornelissen, 2009).

However, challenges remain, including:

  • Divergent national interests and historical grievances
  • The Sunni-Shia divide and nationalistic tendencies complicate unification efforts

For successful collaboration, leaders must prioritize Muslim interests over bilateral relations with Western powers.

What if Realpolitik Leads to Increased Authoritarianism?

Conversely, the resurgence of Realpolitik may increase authoritarian tendencies within Muslim-majority countries. By prioritizing national security and stability, leaders might employ repressive measures to quell dissent, undermining democratic movements and civil liberties (Albrecht & Wegner, 2006). This scenario poses dire consequences, including:

  • An increase in human rights abuses
  • Stifled free speech, particularly in politically turbulent nations

Heightened authoritarianism could ignite regional tensions, drawing in external actors and escalating conflicts. Furthermore, the paradoxical nature of Western responses—where punitive measures entrench power instead of promoting reform—perpetuates cycles of alienation and repression (Bedeski et al., 1993; Hegghammer, 2010).

Balancing stability with the aspirations of the populace is essential. The global community, including civil society organizations and international actors, must advocate for dialogue and reform, supporting grassroots movements prioritizing human rights and sustainable governance.

What if Emerging Powers Shape New Alliances?

As emerging powers like Turkey, Indonesia, and Iran assert their influence, new alliances among Muslim-majority countries could fundamentally reshape the geopolitical landscape. In a multipolar world, regional leaders may prioritize collective Muslim interests over Western hegemony, fostering:

  • Economic partnerships
  • Cultural exchanges
  • Military cooperation to enhance political stability (Barkawi & Laffey, 2006)

These alliances could enable these nations to emerge as significant players in global markets, challenging the prevailing Western monopoly (Ayoob, 2002; Atran & Axelrod, 2008). However, historical rivalries, particularly the Sunni-Shia divide, pose challenges to effective collaboration.

Emerging dynamics may provoke backlash from established powers, leading to increased interventionist policies that threaten sovereignty. Navigating relationships carefully while prioritizing dialogue and mutual respect is essential for maximizing benefits.

Strategic Maneuvers

To adeptly navigate Realpolitik, Muslim-majority countries must adopt strategic maneuvers emphasizing dialogue, equity, and collaborative governance. Key strategies include:

  1. Engaging in multilateral dialogues: Promoting trust among nations through inclusive discussions that incorporate civil society representatives (Osler, 2009; Preece, 1997).
  2. Economic diversification: Reducing dependency on traditional allies by forging partnerships with emerging economies across Latin America, Africa, and Asia (Kaplan, 2008; Nye, 2004).
  3. Supporting grassroots movements: Advocacy for human rights, social equity, and sustainable development to pressure governments into implementing inclusive policies (Henderson & Tucker, 2001; Ayoob, 2002).

Additionally, redefining cooperation parameters within the Muslim world is crucial. Countries should seek collaboration on non-political issues, such as:

  • Education
  • Healthcare
  • Technology

This can build trust and establish frameworks for addressing contentious political matters. By harnessing shared cultural and religious commonalities as soft power, promoting cultural exchanges, and using digital diplomacy, Muslim-majority countries can effectively counter negative stereotypes and present positive narratives.

In summary, navigating the complexities of Realpolitik in the Muslim world demands strategic foresight. By prioritizing inclusive governance, fostering dialogue, and championing economic diversification, Muslim-majority nations can emerge as proactive agents in the quest for a more equitable and just global order.

References

  1. Albrecht, H., & Wegner, E. (2006). Authoritarianism and Civil Society in the Arab World. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication.
  2. Atran, S., & Axelrod, R. (2008). Reframing Sacred Values. Negotiation Journal.
  3. Ayoob, M. (2002). Inequality and Theoretical Perspectives on International Relations. International Studies Review.
  4. Barkawi, T., & Laffey, M. (2006). The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies. Review of International Studies.
  5. Bedeski, R. J., et al. (1993). The Impact of Authoritarianism on Human Rights in the Middle East. Global Governance.
  6. Cornelissen, S. (2009). Globalization and the Muslim World. Geopolitics.
  7. Hafez, M., & Mullins, C. (2015). The Role of Regional Organizations in the Global Political Economy. Journal of International Relations.
  8. Hegghammer, T. (2010). The Future of Jihadism in the Arab Spring. Middle East Policy.
  9. Ibrahim, A. (2015). Building Muslim Solidarity in a Globalized World. Islamic Studies.
  10. Kaplan, R. D. (2008). The Coming Anarchy: Shattering the Dreams of the Post-Cold War. The Atlantic.
  11. Mahmood, S. (2006). Beyond the Veil: The Conduct of Muslim Majority States. Journal of Middle Eastern Politics.
  12. Nandy, A. (1995). The Politics of Secularism and the Recovery of Religious Tolerance. Journal of Critical Sociology.
  13. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.
  14. Osler, A. (2009). Democracy and Global Citizenship Education. International Journal of Citizenship and Teacher Education.
  15. Preece, J. (1997). The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in Global Governance. Public Administration Review.
  16. Ruben, R. (2004). Regionalism in the Middle East: Old Beginnings and New Directions. Middle Eastern Studies.
  17. Schmidt, A. (2004). Civil Society and Political Participation in Muslim-Majority States. Middle East Journal.
  18. van Ham, P. (2008). Social Power in International Politics. The International Spectator.
← Prev Next →