Muslim World Report

America's Authoritarian Turn and Its Global Muslim Impact

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 12, 2025 10:29 AM | 6 min read | 1252 words

TL;DR: The rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. is threatening democracy and global civil rights, particularly affecting Muslim communities. This post explores the implications of this trend, the potential for increased xenophobia, and the need for solidarity among marginalized groups to combat authoritarianism and protect human rights.

The Rise of Authoritarianism in America: Implications for the Muslim World

In July 2024, Kevin Roberts, the President of the Heritage Foundation, issued a stark warning about the potential for a “second American Revolution.” This declaration, framed within the context of rising discontent among conservative factions, signals a pivotal moment not only for American democracy but also for global civil society.

The atmosphere in Washington, D.C., is increasingly charged, as fear and uncertainty loom large, particularly regarding the resurgence of ultranationalist ideologies encapsulated in Project 2025, a controversial manifesto authored by Roberts’ organization. Critics argue that this document serves as a blueprint for authoritarian governance, echoing regimes that have historically undermined democratic frameworks (Mavroudi, 2010; Minkenberg, 2018).

Roberts’ rhetoric raises essential questions about the future of democracy in the United States, as it is characterized by:

  • Alarming coherence and strategic framing
  • Potential consolidation of power under ultranationalist ideals

Some might suggest that these ultranationalist ideals may be a calculated effort, potentially orchestrated by figures like Stephen Miller, to consolidate power under the guise of preserving American values (Fukuyama, 2011). This growing authoritarianism threatens not only the fabric of American democracy but also creates ripples that could destabilize political landscapes globally, particularly in societies already vulnerable to autocratic influences (Kavanagh, 2020).

The Potential Consequences of American Authoritarianism

Should America descend into autocracy, the repercussions for global governance could be profound. The potential consequences include:

  • Countries relying on U.S. leadership facing a shift toward authoritarian regimes, such as those in Russia and China (Rose, 1997).
  • A significant rollback of international human rights standards, where authoritarian America signals to other nations that violating democratic norms is acceptable and advantageous (Diamond, 1994; Mavroudi, 2010).
  • An uptick in human rights abuses, particularly against marginalized communities, including Muslims, who have been targets of discriminatory policies and rhetoric.

Moreover, if the U.S. government adopts a more authoritarian stance, potential risks arise for:

  • Domestic civil rights and international human rights advocates
  • Governments worldwide feeling emboldened to repress dissent under the guise of maintaining internal security

For instance, authoritarian trends in Turkey could be exacerbated as they take cues from U.S. practices, further tightening control over civil society.

If anti-Muslim sentiments proliferate alongside an authoritarian agenda, the implications for global Muslim communities could be devastating. Such shifts may:

  • Legitimize oppressive policies in other nations, echoing U.S. actions.
  • Cause a surge in violence and discrimination against Muslims, as global perceptions reinforce dangerous narratives.

The Risks of Domestic Unrest

Violent protests could emerge in response to authoritarianism, revealing complexities such as:

  • Providing authoritarian leaders a pretext for implementing stricter measures
  • Manipulating narratives to portray dissenters, particularly leftist activists, as terrorists

This vicious cycle challenges civil rights movements in America and may have geopolitical ramifications, leading international observers to misinterpret domestic unrest as a sign of American decline (Mainwaring & Pérez-Liñán, 2015).

The potential for increased surveillance and repression is significant if protests turn violent. Possible outcomes include:

  • A national crackdown on dissent, marked by an increase in policing and mass arrests
  • Federal agencies expanding power under the pretense of restoring order

Consequences for civil liberties would be dire, with increased racial profiling and discrimination against Muslims likely. The concept of the “enemy within” could become mainstream, further marginalizing Muslim communities as nationalist sentiments rise globally (Choudhury & Fenwick, 2011; Hikam & Munabari, 2022).

The Global Consequences of American Authoritarianism

The implications of American authoritarianism would not be confined to U.S. borders. The global landscape could shift dramatically, potentially leading to:

  • A reassessment of commitments from countries aligned with U.S. democratic values
  • A decrease in global advocacy for human rights as diplomatic ties weaken

Authoritarian regimes might view any U.S. descent into authoritarianism as validation for strengthening their own illiberal practices, enabling them to justify human rights violations.

Furthermore, should America endorse anti-Muslim sentiment, the global impact could be catastrophic. An implicit endorsement from the world’s leading democracy might lead to:

  • A resurgence of hate crimes and discriminatory policies against Muslims
  • Amplified narratives that position Muslims as threats, exacerbating polarization and fear

The Potential for Democratic Resilience

On the other hand, if the U.S. resists authoritarian encroachment, far-reaching implications could arise:

  • A reaffirmation of democratic ideals, restoring the U.S. role as a global human rights advocate (Mavroudi, 2010).
  • The galvanization of international coalitions against authoritarianism, encouraging democratic movements in repressive regimes (Giroux, 2005).

Within the U.S., a unified effort to protect civil rights could foster greater visibility and support for marginalized communities, including Muslims, potentially leading to transformative changes in policies that encourage inclusivity (Malone & Dammert, 2020; Plattner, 2015).

If America reclaims its leadership in promoting democracy, this could inspire other countries facing democratic challenges. A strengthened U.S. could counterbalance authoritarian influences, collaborating with like-minded nations to uphold human rights.

As transnational solidarity movements thrive, Muslim communities worldwide could receive renewed support, enabling robust efforts to combat Islamophobia and enhance engagement in international forums.

Strategic Maneuvers: Actions for All Players

In light of these potential futures, all stakeholders—government officials, civil society organizations, and citizens—must engage in strategic planning to safeguard democracy and human rights. Essential actions include:

  • For the Biden administration: A proactive stance to bolster democratic institutions and promote transparency in governance while engaging with marginalized communities, particularly Muslims.
  • For civil society organizations: Advocacy for justice and equity, creating networks for solidarity, mobilizing against hate, and educating on civil rights.
  • For ordinary citizens: Grassroots activism through protests, voter registration drives, and constructive dialogue to counter extremist beliefs.

Internationally, leaders and organizations must commit to a unified front against the erosion of democratic norms, advocating for the protection of human rights globally.

The landscape of the U.S. and the Muslim world stands at a critical juncture. The intertwined narratives of democracy, authoritarianism, and the struggles of minority communities underscore the interconnected nature of the fight for justice. Solidarity against oppression must transcend borders, emphasizing the importance of unity in the pursuit of human rights. The stakes have never been higher as the world grapples with the rise of authoritarianism and its implications for vulnerable populations.

References

← Prev Next →