Muslim World Report

American Democracy in Decline: Global Impacts Revealed by Study

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 5, 2025 10:10 AM | 7 min read | 1340 words

TL;DR: A recent international study reveals a concerning decline in U.S. democracy, which threatens its global standing and could embolden authoritarianism worldwide. The potential ramifications can be dire for U.S. foreign relations and international cooperation. Conversely, if the U.S. commits to democratic reforms, it may regain its status as a champion of democracy, fostering new alliances and collaborative efforts globally.

The Erosion of U.S. Democracy: Global Implications

In recent years, a troubling trend has emerged: the steady erosion of democracy in the United States. An international study involving 11,810 respondents from twelve different countries has brought this issue to the forefront, revealing deep concerns about American democratic integrity (Foa & Mounk, 2017). Many perceive the U.S. as slipping further into authoritarianism, spurred by recent legislative measures such as the Patriot Act and judicial decisions like Citizens United, which have severely compromised political integrity and public trust (Fisher, 2009). The implications of these findings are profound, both for the United States and for the global order.

Historically, the United States has prided itself on being a beacon of democracy, setting standards for political discourse and governance worldwide. However, this study indicates that the American example is now viewed with skepticism, potentially undermining the soft power it has long wielded.

Potential Global Repercussions:

  • The decline of U.S. democracy could:
    • Embolden authoritarian tendencies elsewhere.
    • Allow oppressive regimes to justify their repressive measures by pointing to the deterioration of democratic norms in America (Carey et al., 2019).
    • Complicate U.S. foreign relations, particularly with nations that have traditionally aligned themselves with American values.

While the study reveals a decline in favorable views towards the U.S., it also highlights resilience in support for collaboration on critical issues among key partner countries. As noted by Diamond (2015), this duality paints a complex picture of America’s standing in the global arena: On one hand, its ability to champion democracy is severely compromised; on the other, its partnerships remain valued for pragmatic reasons. The imperatives of climate change, security, and trade will force nations to engage with the U.S., even as public sentiments shift.

What If the U.S. Continues on Its Current Trajectory?

Should the current trajectory of democratic erosion continue unabated, the implications could be dire:

Domestic Consequences:

  • A populace increasingly disillusioned with political processes may resort to:
    • Extremism
    • Civil unrest (Inglehart & Norris, 2016).

As faith in democratic norms wanes, an environment conducive to authoritarianism could take root, leading to further suppression of dissent and polarization of the political landscape. The escalation of disinformation campaigns could further entrench divisions, making consensus-building nearly impossible.

Global Consequences:

  • Other nations often look to the U.S. as a model for governance. The decline in democratic standards might embolden authoritarian leaders who could use the American example to:
    • Justify their own repressive measures (Mudde, 2022).

The narrative of democracy as a universal aspiration would falter as countries witness the unraveling of democratic institutions in the U.S., leading to a potential reconfiguration of the global ideological landscape.

Moreover, the soft power America has enjoyed would further diminish. As Collier (2004) argues, countries may seek alternative alliances based on different values, potentially leading to a multipolar world where authoritarian regimes gain credibility.

In this scenario, global cooperation on pressing issues like climate change and health security would be jeopardized. Nations may become hesitant to engage with a country perceived as abandoning its commitment to democratic principles. The erosion of the U.S. image on the world stage began long before recent events, with significant declines attributed to actions such as the invasion of Iraq (Fisher, 2009).

What If the U.S. Adopts Reform Measures?

Conversely, should the U.S. government take meaningful steps to reform its democratic institutions, there exists potential for revitalization. A commitment to campaign finance reform, protection of voting rights, and accountability among lawmakers could restore faith in political processes both domestically and internationally (Dorf & Sabel, 1998).

Potential Benefits of Reform:

  • Effective reforms could lead to:
    • A renaissance of American diplomacy founded on principles of transparency and justice (Tao et al., 2010).
    • Renewed global commitment to democratic governance as a counter to authoritarianism.

However, reform does not come without risks. As seen in other contexts (Ivkovic & Shelley, 2008), entrenched interests that benefit from the current system are likely to resist significant changes, potentially leading to further polarization and unrest. Thus, it becomes imperative for reform advocates to build broad coalitions that transcend traditional political divides.

The degree to which these reform measures are embraced by the electorate will ultimately determine their impact on global perception. A successful reform effort could foster a reinforcing cycle of engagement, wherein improved domestic governance enhances international partnerships.

What If the Global Community Rejects U.S. Leadership?

These scenarios lead us to a crucial question: what if the global community collectively decides to re-evaluate its relationship with the U.S.? In a situation where international partners opt for a more balanced approach to global governance, we may witness the emergence of alternative coalitions that prioritize:

  • Human rights
  • Democratic governance over traditional alliances with the U.S. (Acharya, 2016).

This shift could reshape the dynamics of global governance. Institutions like the United Nations may experience heightened tensions as countries align based on ideological principles rather than historical alliances.

Potential Outcomes of Rejection:

  • Fragmentation in international relations, marked by:
    • Emergence of multiple power centers.
    • Heightened geopolitical rivalries, particularly with rising powers like China and India.

Nations may prioritize their national interests over collaborative efforts, potentially increasing conflicts as diplomatic negotiations become less viable (Pion Berlin & Ivey, 2021).

Strategic Maneuvers

Given the pressing nature of the issues at stake, several strategic actions should be considered by all players involved—ranging from U.S. policymakers to international actors engaging with the U.S.:

  1. For U.S. Government:

    • Confront the erosion of democracy as a critical issue demanding urgent attention (Inglehart & Norris, 2016).
    • Introduce legislative measures to promote electoral integrity and equitable political representation, prioritizing campaign finance reform.

  2. Empowering Civil Society:

    • Support civil society organizations advocating for transparency and accountability to rebuild democratic norms.
    • Foster dialogue and consensus-building within diverse U.S. communities to bridge partisan divides (Diamond, 2015).

  3. Internationally:

    • Allied nations should reassess their dependency on U.S. leadership.
    • Explore forming regional coalitions that prioritize shared interests in governance and human rights.

  4. Constructive Critique:

    • States engaging with the U.S. should adopt a posture of constructive critique, leveraging their relationships to encourage positive change within American democracy.

The crisis in U.S. democracy presents both challenges and opportunities. As we reflect on the global implications of these developments, it becomes essential for all stakeholders to adopt a proactive stance, navigating this complex landscape with foresight and integrity in order to foster a world where democracy thrives. The future of global governance may depend on the choices made today in Washington and beyond.

References

  • Acharya, A. (2016). “Global South and the Challenge to Western Hegemony.” International Relations.
  • Carey, S., et al. (2019). “The Impact of U.S. Democratic Erosion on Global Governance.” Journal of Democracy.
  • Collier, P. (2004). “The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and What Can Be Done About It.” Oxford University Press.
  • Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. (1998). “A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism.” Columbia Law Review.
  • Diamond, L. (2015). “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy.
  • Fisher, L. (2009). The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Power in the United States.
  • Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2017). “The Danger of Deconsolidation: A Global Perspective.” Journal of Democracy.
  • Gurr, T. R. (1985). “The Political Origins of Democratic Development.” Comparative Politics.
  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016). “Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash.” Harvard Kennedy School.
  • Ivkovic, S., & Shelley, T. (2008). “Fast and Slow Democratic Reforms: A Cross-National Study.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology.
  • Mainwaring, S., & Pérez-Liñán, A. (2015). “Regime Change in the Americas: A Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Democracy.
  • Mudde, C. (2022). “Populism: A Very Short Introduction.” Oxford University Press.
  • Pion Berlin, A., & Ivey, J. (2021). “Fragmentation of International Relations in the Multipolar World.” Global Policy.
  • Tao, R., et al. (2010). “Restoring America’s Reputation.” Foreign Affairs.
← Prev Next →