Muslim World Report

Mark Carney Declares Canada Most European Non-European Country

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Mar 18, 2025 10:35 AM | 12 min read | 2444 words

TL;DR: Mark Carney describes Canada as “the most European of non-European countries,” suggesting a potential shift toward deeper ties with the EU. This blog explores implications of Canada contemplating EU membership, maintaining its distance, or pursuing a hybrid approach, highlighting the challenges and opportunities of each scenario.

Canada and the European Dream: Implications in a Shifting Geopolitical Landscape

During a recent visit to France, former Bank of England Governor Mark Carney referred to Canada as “the most European of non-European countries.” This characterization underscores a critical juncture in Canada’s identity and its future within the global geopolitical framework.

Carney’s remarks coincide with a growing discourse surrounding the possibility of deepening ties between Canada and the European Union (EU), driven by shared values such as:

  • Diplomacy
  • Kindness
  • An inclination towards peaceful conflict resolution

This shift comes at a time when the international order is being reshaped by rising tensions in various regions and the emergence of new multipolar dynamics.

Historically, Canada has positioned itself as a mediator in international conflicts while advocating for multiculturalism and human rights, akin to a bridge builder spanning diverse cultures and ideologies. Yet, as the world grapples with challenges such as:

  • Climate change
  • Economic inequality
  • Political instability

There is an increasing call for a reevaluation of Canada’s role on the global stage. Should Canada align more closely with Europe—potentially even pursuing EU membership—the implications could be vast, influencing everything from trade relations to foreign policy stances. This prospective shift might be perceived as a move away from its North American roots, significantly impacting Canada’s relationship with the U.S. and other Commonwealth nations.

This strategic pivot raises essential questions about what it means for Canada to embrace a European identity in an era marked by nationalistic tendencies and geopolitical strife. Could Canada serve as a counterbalance to rising populism in Europe, or would this shift exacerbate existing divisions? The relationship between French-speaking Quebec and English-speaking Canada is unique, setting it apart from other Commonwealth nations and echoing historical ties to Europe. As European nations navigate their internal challenges, the prospect of Canada integrating more deeply into the EU presents both opportunities and risks. Carney’s statements highlight how these realignments could serve as a bellwether for broader ideological shifts in global governance, particularly as Western powers reconsider their roles and responsibilities in an evolving world order.

What If Canada Joins the EU?

If Canada were to pursue EU membership, the ramifications could be profound not just for Canada but also for Europe and the global order.

Key implications include:

  1. Regulatory Changes: Aligning with European regulatory standards would necessitate monumental changes within Canadian legislation. This would likely enhance:

    • Consumer protections
    • Privacy laws
    • Environmental regulations

    For Canadian citizens, such changes could enhance safeguards and quality of life; however, they could also pose challenges for businesses accustomed to operating under different regulatory conditions (Busch & Jörgens, 2005). Imagine the transition as a ship changing its course mid-ocean; while it could reach safer waters, the journey might be tumultuous.

  2. Shifts in North American Dynamics: Canada’s entry into the EU could catalyze a shift in its relationship with the U.S. Historically, the U.S. has viewed Canada as an essential ally and trading partner, akin to a steadfast neighbor sharing a fence. However, if Canada were to become more European in its policy orientation, it could:

    • Strain this relationship
    • Lead to a re-examination of NAFTA/USMCA agreements
    • Foster an environment of economic competition rather than collaboration (Hawkesworth & Kogan, 1993)

Could the door to the EU become a barrier between Canada and the U.S., altering the friendly exchanges for something more contentious?

  1. Impact on Global Roles: Canada’s membership in the EU would alter its role in global organizations, enabling it to become a more influential voice within the United Nations or the G7, advocating for European-centric policies. However, it might also:
    • Alienate smaller Commonwealth nations and other allies that do not share similar values or policy frameworks
    • Create rifts in existing diplomatic relationships (Nelles & Alcantara, 2011)

Ultimately, such a move would redefine Canada’s identity on the world stage, compelling a reconsideration of its historical role as a mediator and peacekeeper. Could this shift dilute Canada’s unique value as a bridge between different political landscapes?

  1. Collaboration on Global Issues: Joining the EU could open avenues for Canada to collaborate more effectively on pressing global issues such as:

    • Climate change
    • Migration
    • Security

    For instance, Canada may align with EU members on robust environmental agreements that promote sustainable practices and green technologies (Kuzemko et al., 2022). This alignment could enhance Canada’s credibility as a leader on environmental issues, particularly given the EU’s commitment to the Green Deal and other climate initiatives. However, as Canada steps onto this larger stage, will its voice resonate as clearly among the EU’s diverse chorus?

Yet, the repercussions of this shift would not be without challenges. Canada could face pressures to conform to EU policies that may not resonate with its domestic political landscape. For example:

  • Canadian agricultural policies might clash with EU Common Agricultural Policy norms
  • Labor laws may require substantial overhaul (Antokhiv-Skolozdra, 2020)

Additionally, the harmonization of regulations could lead to increased burdens on Canadian industries, particularly those that have thrived under the current North American system. Will these challenges prove to be stepping stones or stumbling blocks on Canada’s path to EU membership?

What If Canada Remains Detached from Europe?

Should Canada choose to maintain its current trajectory and distance itself from the EU, it risks falling behind in an increasingly interconnected world. By prioritizing its longstanding relationship with the U.S., Canada may forgo potential benefits from closer ties with Europe, such as:

  • Enhanced trade opportunities
  • Cultural exchanges
  • Collaborative efforts in tackling global issues like climate change (Cotula, 2012)

In a world where international norms are evolving rapidly, Canada’s decision to remain detached could lead to diminished influence in critical geopolitical discussions. As Europe grapples with challenges posed by Russia’s aggression and navigates internal political divides, Canada could find itself sidelined in dialogues that directly affect its national interests.

Consider the historical example of Canada’s role in World War I and II, where it positioned itself alongside European allies, helping to forge vital alliances that defined its international identity. By distancing itself now, Canada risks repeating a pattern of isolation that could leave it vulnerable in times of global crisis.

Moreover, as the EU pursues its Green Deal and other progressive initiatives, Canada may lose ground in innovation and public policy, facing increased pressure to adopt more forward-thinking approaches to environmental stewardship and social justice (Kuzemko et al., 2022). The importance of this alignment is underscored by statistics indicating that countries with strong environmental policies tend to see significant economic growth—data that suggests a missed opportunity for Canada if it ignores European advancements.

This scenario also raises critical questions about Canada’s identity and moral standing on global issues. By distancing itself from European norms and practices, Canada risks rendering itself less relevant in global conversations about:

  • Human rights
  • Diplomacy
  • Conflict resolution

This could foster a perception of Canada as an outlier, undermining its historical role as an advocate for equitable policies. In an increasingly polarized world, a lack of alignment with European allies might hinder Canada’s ability to navigate complex international landscapes effectively.

Additionally, remaining detached could exacerbate regional disparities within Canada itself. If the federal government focuses predominantly on its relationship with the U.S., regions such as Quebec—where European ties are historically significant—might feel increasingly marginalized. This dynamic could breed discontent and lead to calls for greater autonomy or a reevaluation of Quebec’s role within the Canadian federation (Hoffmann et al., 1996). As Canada contemplates its future on the world stage, it must grapple with whether a more isolated approach truly serves the interests of all its citizens, or merely caters to a narrow vision of national identity.

What If Canada Pursues a Hybrid Approach?

A hybrid approach that seeks to balance Canadian interests with renewed engagement with Europe may offer a pragmatic path forward. By selectively aligning with European policies on key issues—such as:

  • Climate change
  • Digital rights
  • Humanitarian advocacy

While retaining strong ties with North America, Canada could carve out a unique niche within the global order. Much like a seasoned diplomat navigating a crowded ballroom, Canada can deftly maneuver between the interests of Europe and the U.S., leveraging its distinct cultural and historical ties to both regions to act as a bridge.

Pursuing this balanced approach could enhance Canada’s diplomatic clout, positioning it as a leader in fostering transatlantic cooperation. Canada could advocate for shared environmental initiatives that align with European goals while promoting trade agreements that prevent over-reliance on any single market. For instance, in 2019, the European Union and Canada signed the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), a testament to the potential for fruitful partnerships that resonate with both regions. By actively participating in multilateral organizations, Canada can champion progressive policies that reflect both European and North American values (Tande, 2000).

Furthermore, this hybrid strategy could strengthen relationships with Commonwealth nations. Through cultural diplomacy and economic partnerships, Canada can facilitate dialogue on shared challenges, reinforcing its role as a moderate player on the world stage. Such a stance would also allow Canada to maintain its commitment to humanitarian principles, helping to mediate conflicts and advocate for social justice without compromising its national interests.

This hybrid approach includes:

  • Diplomatic engagement
  • Strategic economic partnerships that embrace trade opportunities with Europe while maintaining a robust relationship with the United States

By diversifying its economic ties, Canada could mitigate risks associated with over-reliance on any single trading partner, thus fostering a more resilient economy (McKay, 2000). For example, during the 2008 financial crisis, countries with diversified trade relationships, such as Australia, fared better than those heavily reliant on a single market.

Moreover, Canada has an opportunity to position itself as a leader in digital innovation and technology, aligning with European efforts to regulate data privacy and digital rights. By embracing these emerging global standards, Canada could not only protect its citizens but also enhance its competitiveness in the global market—a critical asset in an era where technology is increasingly central to both economic and social governance.

In addition, pursuing a hybrid model could allow Canada to align itself with like-minded countries within the Commonwealth and beyond, fostering a broader coalition that champions sustainability, democratic governance, and human rights. For example, Canada could work closely with countries such as New Zealand and Australia, which share similar political values and face comparable environmental challenges, to create joint initiatives that resonate within both the Commonwealth and the EU context.

As Canada navigates its relationship with Europe, it will also have to contend with complex domestic dynamics. The ongoing dialogue about Indigenous rights and the need for reconciliation presents a unique opportunity for Canada to underscore its identity as a nation committed to justice and equity. By integrating these ideals into its foreign policy, Canada can position itself as a moral leader—an advocate for human rights and empowerment on the global stage. Can Canada truly fulfill its potential as a bridge between worlds, or will the intricate dance of diplomacy lead to missteps that undermine its aspirations?

The Role of Global Geopolitics

As Canada contemplates its future relationship with Europe, the timing coincides with significant shifts in the global geopolitical landscape. The rise of authoritarianism in various parts of the world, coupled with the challenges posed by economic inequality and climate change, underscores the need for nations to engage in thoughtful and strategic cooperation.

Historically, the transatlantic alliance has proven to be a powerful force in promoting democratic values. For instance, during the Cold War, NATO countries united against the spread of communism, demonstrating that collective action can counter significant threats to democracy and human rights. Similarly, Canada’s potential alignment with Europe could reinforce this transatlantic alliance today, enabling it to actively champion democratic values and human rights in the face of rising populism and isolationism. This coalition could play a pivotal role in countering the influence of authoritarian regimes, particularly in regions experiencing turmoil (George & Schillebeeckx, 2022).

Moreover, Canada’s involvement in the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy could facilitate a more proactive stance in addressing international conflicts, aligning its responses with European allies who share similar values and strategic interests. Just as the successful collaboration of NATO forces in peacekeeping missions has shown, this alignment could foster greater stability in conflict-prone regions through cooperative peacekeeping efforts and diplomatic interventions.

The implications of Canada’s choices extend beyond its borders, impacting global governance structures and international relations. As the world grapples with multifaceted challenges, Canada’s capacity to engage collaboratively with European nations may yield a more cohesive approach to global governance. Imagine a united front where countries coordinate their actions to tackle pressing issues such as climate change, public health crises, and economic disparities, similar to how the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the power of international solidarity (Cotula, 2012).

As it stands at this critical juncture, Canada faces numerous decisions that could redefine its future role in global affairs. Whether it seeks to deepen ties with Europe, maintain its current relationships, or carve out a hybrid approach, the implications of these choices are significant, extending well beyond trade or diplomatic alignments. Ultimately, if Canada chooses to embrace this moment of opportunity, its response to these challenges will shape not only its identity but also its standing in the international community. How will Canada choose to navigate this pivotal moment in history?

References

← Prev Next →