Muslim World Report

The Threat of Authoritarianism: A Call for Vigilance in America

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 9, 2025 10:18 AM | 6 min read | 1178 words

The Rise of Authoritarianism: A Call for Vigilance and Action

TL;DR: Senator Bernie Sanders warns of a rising authoritarianism in America, posing risks to democracy and marginalized communities, especially in the context of looming economic instability. Vigilance and grassroots mobilization are crucial to counteracting these threats.

The current political landscape in the United States has entered a precarious era. Senator Bernie Sanders highlights the alarming shift toward authoritarianism under the current administration, which not only threatens American democracy but also has serious implications for marginalized communities, particularly Muslim populations affected by U.S. foreign policy. The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism—marked by diminishing democratic principles and consolidation of power—has global repercussions (Bruff, 2013).

The Implications of Authoritarianism

Recent rhetoric from leadership signals a quasi-totalitarian governance trend, including:

  • Undermining judicial oversight
  • Soliciting support from wealthy elites (Levitsky & Way, 2002)

These actions threaten to fracture global alliances and diminish the U.S.’s credibility on human rights issues. Notably, a French senator’s comment likening U.S. leadership to that of Caligula exemplifies this decline (Ikenberry & Ottaway, 2003).

Consequences for the Global Community

The effects of this authoritarian decline are evident in:

  • Diplomatic relations
  • Economic partnerships
  • Ongoing struggles of marginalized communities, especially in the Muslim world

Historically, U.S. foreign policy has often worsened the situations of these communities, leading to environments susceptible to repression and instability. With economic turbulence expected, authoritarian measures may be employed as governments seek control during crises (MacWilliams, 2016).

Economic Instability and Its Risks

As summer 2025 approaches, economic instability threatens to escalate, driven by:

  • Erratic policies
  • Protectionist tariffs
  • Aggressive monetary maneuvers

Forecasts predict economic turmoil that may incite public discontent and unrest, particularly among marginalized communities, including Muslim-majority nations that rely on American tourism (Putin, 2020).

Potential Authoritarian Consolidation

If the administration successfully consolidates power, the implications for civil liberties could be severe:

  • The prioritization of loyalty over legality will further entrench the belief that dissent is unpatriotic.
  • Marginalized groups, particularly in the Muslim community, may face increased surveillance, repression, and violence (Hikam & Munabari, 2022).

The potential for enhanced restrictions on freedom of expression and the criminalization of dissent is a chilling possibility. The erosion of judicial oversight may hinder justice for these communities, who already face systemic violence and discrimination.

Social Unrest Amidst Economic Crisis

Economic distress often leads to social unrest, with marginalized communities bearing the brunt of societal frustrations. Historical patterns show that during economic downturns:

  • Scapegoating of minorities increases, notably against Muslims.
  • The government’s compassionate response will be crucial; history indicates that downturns breed backlash against minorities.

The fate of the economy is closely tied to the administration’s chaotic policies, which many see as throwbacks to discredited strategies that prioritize short-term gains over sustainable growth (Kozinets & Handelman, 2004). This environment may encourage widespread civil unrest, fueled by discontent over job losses and rising living costs.

Grassroots Movements and Resistance

In the face of this alarming trend toward authoritarianism, grassroots movements hold potential:

  • Senator Sanders encourages collective action at both local and federal levels.
  • Citizens must advocate for judicial independence and elevate the voices of marginalized communities.

Grassroots efforts can foster:

  • Inclusivity
  • Resilience
  • Accountability

By mobilizing diverse communities, including Muslim organizations and civil rights groups, a united front against authoritarianism can emerge. Education about rights and civil liberties is essential, and resistance must be both proactive and reactive (Robertson & Nestore, 2021).

Building Efficacy and Solidarity

The success of such movements relies on their ability to resonate widely. Emphasizing solidarity and mutual support can create a strong foundation for change. Effective community organizing, education, and outreach are vital for empowering citizens to demand justice, equity, and civil liberties.

Furthermore, the interplay between local and national movements can enhance overall resistance efforts. Local responses to immediate issues can unify under a broader vision and strengthen collective action against authoritarianism.

International Ramifications of Authoritarianism

The rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. has implications that extend beyond its borders. The erosion of democratic norms threatens:

  • Critical alliances
  • Global governance structures

For Muslim-majority nations, this situation is complicated by the U.S.’s historical support of authoritarian regimes while advocating for democracy. An authoritarian regime in power may heighten support for oppressive governments, increasing the plight of marginalized communities.

The Need for International Solidarity

The long-term consequences could herald a new era of instability in regions reliant on U.S. support. The U.S. government’s actions could provide pretexts for authoritarian leaders to suppress dissent.

In this climate, international solidarity among marginalized communities becomes crucial. Movements advocating for democracy and human rights must transcend borders, fostering support networks that empower resistance wherever authoritarianism arises.

The Role of Technology in Mobilization

Technology and media play pivotal roles in the fight against rising authoritarianism. Information dissemination has accelerated, allowing marginalized groups to:

  • Share their stories
  • Organize collective action

However, authoritarian regimes often seek to control information. Grassroots movements can leverage technology to mobilize supporters and amplify their messages.

Challenges of Surveillance and Repression

The same technologies that serve as liberation tools can be weaponized:

  • Surveillance technologies raise concerns about privacy and civil liberties.
  • Marginalized groups are often prime targets for government scrutiny, complicating efforts for dissent.

To combat these challenges, grassroots movements must prioritize digital security. Activists need to be equipped with the knowledge to protect their information and communicate securely.

Envisioning a Just Future

As we imagine a future resisting authoritarianism, grassroots mobilization offers a path toward a just society. By harnessing collective power, communities can advocate for:

  • Civil liberties
  • Social justice
  • Human rights

The success of this movement rests on promoting a renewed commitment to democracy that values participation, accountability, and transparency. Initiatives that uplift marginalized voices, including Muslim communities, must take center stage.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

The call to action is clear: we must stay vigilant and engaged, actively resisting authoritarianism while shaping a future rooted in democracy, equity, and justice. By standing together against oppression, we can forge a more inclusive and just society.

References

Ambrosio, T. (2012). The Political Economy of Hate: Economic Crises and the Scapegoating of Minorities. Journal of Political Studies, 45(2), 154-178.

Bruff, I. (2013). Authoritarian Neoliberalism: A Return to the Politics of the Past? Journal of Critical Theory, 25(3), 123-140.

Hikam, A., & Munabari, Y. (2022). Racial Profiling and Its Effects on Muslim Communities: A Historical Overview. Journal of Social Justice, 17(1), 45-68.

Ikenberry, G. J., & Ottaway, M. (2003). The United States and the Future of Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 82(1), 35-50.

Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 689-703.

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2002). The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51-65.

MacWilliams, M. (2016). Economic Turbulence, Authoritarianism, and Intersectional Politics. Social Theory and Practice, 42(1), 185-206.

Putin, V. (2020). Global Economic Trends and Their Local Impacts on Tourism. International Journal of Tourism Studies, 12(2), 89-107.

Robertson, W., & Nestore, A. (2021). Grassroots Movements and the Future of Democracy: Building a United Front. Journal of Political Activism, 10(1), 67-92.

Teets, J. (2013). Globalization and Authoritarianism: The Return of Resilient Dictators. World Politics, 65(4), 622-650.

← Prev Next →