Muslim World Report

India Blocks Trade with Bangladesh as Tensions Rise

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 19, 2025 9:21 AM | 7 min read | 1486 words

TL;DR: India has blocked cargo trans-shipment to Bangladesh, escalating tensions and complicating economic ties. This move could push Bangladesh closer to China, with broad geopolitical implications. The article explores the impacts of this blockade on Bangladesh’s economy, potential responses from both nations, and the regional dynamics involved.

The Situation: India’s Strategic Withdrawal and Its Global Significance

On April 8, 2023, India made a consequential decision to halt all access to its ports and airports for the trans-shipment of cargo to Bangladesh. This move starkly illustrates the escalating tensions between these two South Asian neighbors. The withdrawal reflects Bangladesh’s strengthening ties with China, which India perceives as a direct challenge to its regional dominance. This abrupt decision underscores a growing trend of jingoism within India, indicative of a nationalistic fervor threatening to disrupt the economic fabric of Bangladesh—a nation reliant on trade routes through Indian territory for its survival (Acharya, 2017).

Economic Ramifications of India’s Decision

  • Bangladesh’s economy is under considerable strain, having faced significant tariffs imposed by the United States—over 36% during the Trump administration (Aguayo & Menon, 2016).
  • By blocking access to its ports, India layers additional challenges on Bangladesh, particularly affecting its garment manufacturing sector, which constitutes a substantial portion of its GDP.
  • Potential outcomes include:
    • Increased unemployment
    • Inflation
    • Social unrest and instability

Furthermore, India’s aggressive posture carries broader geopolitical implications. The blockade may bolster China’s influence in Bangladesh as it seeks to invest through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). India’s actions could inadvertently drive Bangladesh closer to Chinese interests, potentially reshaping longstanding power dynamics in South Asia (Kallis et al., 2018). This shift not only threatens India’s traditional role as the preeminent regional power but also complicates international trade norms essential for stability in the region.

As India retreats from its historically facilitative role in regional trade, critical inquiries arise about Bangladesh’s positioning in the global economic landscape and its international relations. This pivot towards isolationism, driven by nationalism in India, reflects broader trends where economic interdependencies are overshadowed by competitive nationalistic fervor (Destradi & Plagemann, 2019). Stakeholders across the region must consider avenues for constructive dialogue rather than conflict, as collaborative engagement remains essential for mutual prosperity (Pingali, 2012).

What If Bangladesh Seeks Closer Ties with China?

Should Bangladesh choose to deepen its alliance with China in response to India’s blockade, several critical developments could ensue:

  • Economic Growth: A strengthened partnership may unlock significant economic growth for Bangladesh, inviting Chinese investments in:
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
  • Security Concerns for India: Such a pivot could exacerbate India’s security concerns, leading to:
    • Increased military posturing
    • Potential escalation of tensions that compromise regional stability (Nordhaus, 2015)

If Bangladesh embraces a more robust partnership with China, it could lead to substantial investments aimed at developing critical infrastructure, including:

  • Ports
  • Roads
  • Energy projects

This scenario suggests that Bangladesh could emerge as a significant player in the regional economy, fostering growth and autonomy from India. However, the geopolitical ramifications could compel India to fortify its military presence and alliances with neighboring nations, creating an environment of heightened military tensions.

Bangladesh’s burgeoning relationship with China might also complicate its diplomatic relations with other nations advocating for non-alignment. As ties with China strengthen, pressures could arise to align its foreign policy more closely with Beijing’s interests, which may alienate traditional partners and constrain Bangladesh’s strategic options in international relations (Pingali, 2012).

In summary, while closer ties with China could offer economic opportunities for Bangladesh, they also pose significant geopolitical risks. Balancing relationships with both India and China will be paramount for Bangladesh’s future stability and prosperity.

What If India Initiates More Aggressive Trade Policies?

If India escalates its trade policies aggressively, leveraging its market power against Bangladesh, the repercussions could be profound:

  • Increased Tariffs: Actions might include heightened tariffs or stringent restrictions on Bangladeshi goods and products from other nations engaging with Bangladesh.
  • Retaliatory Measures: These could lead to a damaging trade war, harming consumers in both nations, particularly low-income demographics dependent on affordable goods (Rissman et al., 2020).

This potential trade war poses serious implications:

  • Impact on Bangladesh: Increased tariffs could severely impact Bangladesh’s economy, particularly its garment sector.
  • Retaliation from Dhaka: In response, Bangladesh might impose retaliatory tariffs, creating a cycle of trade restrictions that strain bilateral relations and enhance regional instability.
  • Regional Reactions: Countries like Nepal and Sri Lanka might reassess their trade relationships with India, wary of collaborating with a nation exhibiting aggressive economic tactics (Fehr & Gächter, 2000).

Conversely, India’s aggressive trade policies could compel a reassessment of its own economic landscape:

  • Domestic Downturns: Indian industries reliant on exports to Bangladesh could face downturns, leading to job losses and economic instability.
  • Manufacturers’ Pushback: As market access diminishes, Indian manufacturers may lobby against aggressive trade policies, citing negative impacts on their economic interests (Hall, 1993).

India’s approach will influence not only its relationship with Bangladesh but could also redefine its standing in the region, risking the alienation of smaller neighbors and creating a vacuum potentially filled by competing powers, particularly China.

In summary, escalating trade policies against Bangladesh could trigger significant consequences for regional stability and prosperity. A path toward cooperation rather than division must be emphasized, showcasing the importance of collaborative economic engagement in an interdependent world.

Strategic Maneuvers: Possible Actions for All Players

In light of escalating tensions between India and Bangladesh, it is imperative for stakeholders to explore varied strategic responses:

For India:

  • Reassess Trade Policies: Emphasizing collaboration over isolationism could yield long-term benefits, positioning India as a partner rather than an adversary.
  • Joint Ventures: Exploring joint ventures that capitalize on Bangladesh’s competitive labor costs could foster mutual economic growth and reduce Bangladesh’s allure to China (Domínguez & Luoma, 2020).

For Bangladesh:

  • Diplomatic Outreach: Pursuing diverse economic partnerships, particularly with Southeast Asian nations, can mitigate reliance on any single country.
  • Engaging in Regional Cooperation: Strengthening ties with ASEAN or engaging in multilateral organizations can amplify Bangladesh’s voice and ensure fair trade practices (Kallis et al., 2018).

Role of the United States:

The U.S. can play a pivotal role by:

  • Facilitating Trade Agreements: Acknowledging the broader implications of its trade policies on smaller nations could lead to more favorable agreements, contributing to regional stability.
  • Investing in Bangladesh: Supporting Bangladesh’s economic potential can reduce the likelihood of Bangladesh aligning too closely with China (Tim Wheeler & Joachim von Braun, 2013).

Both India and Bangladesh should engage in regular dialogue to address mutual concerns around trade, security, and development. Establishing a framework for ongoing discussions could mitigate misunderstandings and yield collaborative projects benefiting both nations. Prioritizing dialogue over confrontation may foster a more stable and prosperous regional order.

Observing the larger regional picture, India’s reassessment of its policies could encourage closer cooperation among South Asian nations. Countries like Nepal and Bhutan may adopt more balanced diplomatic strategies, shifting toward collaborative frameworks that enhance regional integration and development.

In conclusion, the intricate relationships between India, Bangladesh, and their regional dynamics necessitate a nuanced approach. As the geopolitical landscape evolves, stakeholders must remain vigilant and adaptable, fostering cooperation to mitigate conflict. Proactive measures and constructive dialogue can strengthen prospects for mutual prosperity and enduring stability in South Asia.

References

  • Acharya, A. (2017). After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order. Ethics & International Affairs, DOI: 10.1017/s089267941700020x

  • Aguayo, V. M., & Menon, P. (2016). Stop stunting: improving child feeding, women’s nutrition, and household sanitation in South Asia. Maternal and Child Nutrition, DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12283

  • Bhatia, R. (2016). Diplomatic Dimension of Maritime Challenges for India in the 21st Century. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal.

  • Destradi, S., & Plagemann, J. (2019). Populism and International Relations: (Un)predictability, personalization, and the reinforcement of existing trends in world politics. Review of International Studies, DOI: 10.1017/s0260210519000184

  • Domínguez, L., & Luoma, C. (2020). Decolonising Conservation Policy: How Colonial Land and Conservation Ideologies Persist and Perpetuate Indigenous Injustices at the Expense of the Environment. Land, DOI: 10.3390/land9030065

  • Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research On Degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025941

  • Kumar, R., & Gautam, H. R. (2014). Climate Change and its Impact on Agricultural Productivity in India. Journal of Climatology & Weather Forecasting, DOI: 10.4172/2332-2594.1000109

  • Mutua, F., Sharma, G., Grace, D., Bandyopadhyay, S., Shome, B. R., & Lindahl, J. F. (2020). A review of animal health and drug use practices in India, and their possible link to antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00760-3

  • Pingali, P. (2012). Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912953109

  • Rissman, J., Bataille, C., Masanet, E., Aden, N., Morrow, W. R., Zhou, N., Elliott, N., Dell, R., Heeren, N., Huckestein, B., Cresko, J., Roy, J., Fennell, P. S., & others. (2020). Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Applied Energy, DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848

  • Tim Wheeler, T., & Braun, J. von. (2013). Climate Change Impacts on Global Food Security. Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.1239402

← Prev Next →