Muslim World Report

Neoliberalism's Crisis: Reassessing Dynamics in the Muslim World

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Mar 26, 2025 10:24 AM | 14 min read | 2790 words

TL;DR: The Muslim world is witnessing a significant backlash against neoliberal policies, marked by rising anti-imperialist sentiment and authoritarianism. This upheaval demands a reevaluation of governance, highlighting the urgent call for justice and autonomy across the region. Possible scenarios include the rise of anti-neoliberal insurgencies, increased protectionism from Western economies, and potential unification against imperialism, all of which could reshape global dynamics.

The Crumbling Facade: The Neoliberal Order and its Impact on the Muslim World

As of March 2025, a profound shift in the geopolitical landscape, particularly concerning the Muslim world, has become increasingly evident. This transformation is characterized by:

  • Rising anti-imperialist sentiment
  • Increasing authoritarianism within regional powers
  • Growing discontent with Western neoliberal policies

The unrest in Iran, the consolidation of power by the Taliban in Afghanistan, and the ongoing struggles in Palestine are not merely isolated events; they represent a broader crisis of legitimacy for Western-backed regimes and an awakening of nationalist sentiments among oppressed communities.

This scenario echoes historical patterns seen during the decline of colonial empires, where rising national consciousness prompted resistance against external domination. Just as the post-World War II period saw a surge in decolonization movements across Africa and Asia, today’s discontent reflects a similar yearning for self-determination and autonomy. For instance, the overthrow of the Shah in Iran in 1979 was fueled by a confluence of dissatisfaction with Western influence and a desire to reclaim national identity.

These dynamics highlight a critical need for a reassessment of the neoliberal order, which has often marginalized voices in the Global South while perpetuating structural inequalities. Could it be that we are witnessing the dawn of a new era of resistance, where the lessons of the past serve as a roadmap for future movements?

The Impact of Neoliberal Policies

Neoliberal policies have historically exacerbated socioeconomic inequalities and dismantled welfare systems in many Muslim-majority countries. This shift can be likened to a carefully orchestrated symphony where the powerful play their instruments to the detriment of the fragile melodies of the marginalized. Much like the aftermath of the Washington Consensus in the 1990s, this approach has led to a profound disillusionment with Western interventions. As Wendy Brown (2006) notes, the convergence of neoliberalism and neoconservatism has led to:

  • A systematic devaluation of political liberty, equality, and accountability
  • An environment ripe for unrest and resistance

For instance, in countries like Egypt, the application of neoliberal economic reforms resulted in increased poverty rates; the percentage of Egyptians living on less than $2 a day climbed significantly during the early 2000s. This growing dissatisfaction not only poses significant risks for Western interests but also destabilizes the entire global order. Are we witnessing a precarious house of cards, where the pursuit of profit and individualism ultimately jeopardizes the well-being of society as a whole? Such questions compel a reevaluation of the dominant economic paradigms that have shaped international relations since the end of the Cold War.

Complex Interactions and Local Voices

The implications of these transformations extend beyond the borders of individual nations, revealing the complexities of interactions between global capitalism and local responses. The Muslim world, often treated as a monolithic entity influenced solely by external powers, is revealing its diverse voices and aspirations that demand dignity, justice, and autonomy.

Consider the wave of grassroots movements that have emerged across the region, advocating for:

  • Social justice
  • Economic equity

These movements are reminiscent of the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa, where local voices united against a global system that marginalized them. Just as South Africans demanded dignity and equality, these new movements in the Muslim world reflect a broader rejection of neoliberal doctrines and an articulation of alternative visions for governance.

As these voices are allowed to flourish, we may witness a fundamental reorientation of relationships within and beyond the Middle East, challenging the neoliberal consensus that has dominated international relations. Can we afford to ignore the lessons of history, where the cries for justice and equity have reshaped societies? The potential for a similar transformation looms large, urging us to reconsider the frameworks through which we view these complex interactions.

What If There is a Major Anti-Neoliberal Insurgency?

Should the rising anti-neoliberal sentiment catalyze a major insurgency within the Muslim world, the consequences would be far-reaching and dramatic. Key nations such as:

  • Egypt
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Jordan

could witness uprisings challenging the pro-Western leadership that has characterized their modern histories. This situation could evoke memories of the Arab Spring in 2011, when a wave of protests swept across the region, leading to significant regime changes and widespread social upheaval. Just as then, a successful insurgency in one nation could trigger a domino effect, emboldening movements in neighboring countries and leading to increased instability across the region. In fact, history has shown that when people feel marginalized and disenfranchised, they can mobilize quickly and powerfully—does the potential for a new wave of unrest prompt us to reconsider the effectiveness of neoliberal policies in the region?

Global Concerns

This scenario raises significant concerns globally, as heightened military responses from Western powers could:

  • Exacerbate humanitarian crises
  • Lead local governments, armed and supported by Western interests, to escalate their violence against dissenting populations

The potential for widespread unrest and conflict would alarm neighboring nations and may lead to increased refugee flows, destabilizing Europe and other regions. The specter of a humanitarian disaster could galvanize support for authoritarian measures in Western nations, as governments justify the suppression of dissent under the rationale of national security.

This situation evokes the historical parallels of the Syrian Civil War, where increased foreign intervention not only intensified violence but also resulted in millions of refugees fleeing the country, fundamentally altering the demographics and sociopolitical landscape of Europe. In a similar vein, the fallout from the current scenario could produce a ripple effect, reminiscent of the Balkan conflicts of the 1990s, where the aftermath of instability led to significant refugee movements and ethnic tensions.

Moreover, a successful insurgency could dismantle the neoliberal framework itself, overturning the foundations of global capitalism. The transition toward more state-controlled economies might inspire parallel movements worldwide, ushering in economic nationalism over globalization.

In this context, it is critical to recognize that while state intervention can mitigate some effects of neoliberal policies, it must be enacted judiciously to avoid the emergence of authoritarianism and protect against negative externalities that unregulated markets often create, such as wealth inequality and worker exploitation (Baccaro, 2014). How can governments strike the balance between necessary intervention and the risk of curtailing freedoms, and what lessons can be drawn from history to guide their actions in this volatile landscape?

Challenges and Opportunities Ahead

The prospect of a major anti-neoliberal insurgency would trigger a comprehensive reassessment of the region’s socio-political dynamics. Just as the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 signified a pivotal moment for Eastern Europe, the emergence of post-neoliberal governance frameworks could similarly prioritize the needs and aspirations of local populations over the interests of multinational corporations.

Challenging established power dynamics may also inspire movements rooted in social justice and environmental sustainability—much like the grassroots movements of the 1960s that reshaped societal norms around civil rights and environmental protection. As communities gain momentum, the interconnectedness of global issues, such as climate change and economic disparity, could mobilize a new generation of activists demanding accountability from both local and global powers. If these movements succeed, they might not only redefine the boundaries of acceptable political discourse within the region but also raise thought-provoking questions: What does true democracy look like in a world dominated by corporate interests? How can we ensure that the voices of marginalized communities are not just heard but amplified? These shifts could reshape the narratives surrounding governance and authority, potentially leading to a more equitable society.

What If Western Economies Respond with Protectionism?

As the global landscape evolves, Western economies may be tempted to respond to rising anti-neoliberal sentiment with protectionist measures aimed at safeguarding their interests. Such measures could include:

  • Tariffs
  • Trade restrictions
  • Military interventions in the Muslim world to quell dissent

The immediate consequences would likely disrupt global trade networks and intensify existing inequalities. Historically, protectionism has often led to unintended repercussions; for instance, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 aimed to protect American jobs but instead deepened the Great Depression by stifling international trade. For Muslim-majority nations, contemporary protectionist measures could exacerbate challenges such as:

  • Poverty
  • Unemployment
  • Social unrest (Mayer, 2009)

Imagine a tightly woven fabric unraveling at the seams; as Western economies isolate themselves, countries reliant on exports to these markets could find their economies fraying, leading to dire situations. Rising economic isolation may not only fuel further unrest but also provoke a reevaluation of existing governance structures. How long can a society remain stable when its economic foundation is increasingly eroded?

Diplomatic Relations

The shift toward protectionism may also strain diplomatic relations, particularly as Western nations prioritize their economic self-interest over principles of international solidarity. Countries historically aligned with the West may seek partnerships with non-Western powers like China and Russia, reminiscent of the Cold War era when nations reconsidered their allegiances based on economic and military support. This realignment could lead to a significant reconfiguration of global alliances, challenging Western hegemony and echoing past geopolitical shifts (Mudde & Rovira Kaltwasser, 2012).

This scenario may provoke backlash from reformist factions within Muslim nations, emphasizing the necessity for governance that is less beholden to external economic pressures and more attuned to local populations’ aspirations. While this may foster innovation and self-reliance, it could also risk deepening existing divisions and tensions, especially if protectionism compels nations to adopt policies that disadvantage specific groups.

Moreover, consider the historical example of the Arab Economic Unity Agreement of 1964, which aimed to foster economic cooperation among Arab nations but fell short due to political rivalries. Similarly, the current potential for a reassessment of traditional economic relationships may inspire a rebirth of regional integration efforts. The Muslim world could prioritize intra-regional trade and cooperation, fostering economic interdependence that reduces reliance on Western markets.

Furthermore, a protectionist response from Western nations could encourage solidarity among developing countries, prompting them to forge alliances to address common challenges. Like a group of ships navigating through a storm, such collaboration could manifest through regional organizations or new multilateral partnerships focused on sustainable development goals, social justice, and equitable governance. Will these nations find strength in unity, or will the waves of protectionism isolate them further?

What If the Muslim World Unites Against Imperialism?

The unification of the Muslim world against imperialism could yield transformative outcomes with both positive and negative implications. Should nations like:

  • Pakistan
  • Turkey
  • Iran
  • Members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)

forge a cohesive front, they could establish a robust bloc capable of resisting Western influence and advocating for self-determination and justice. This scenario echoes the historical solidarity seen during the Pan-Arabism movement of the mid-20th century, which sought to unite Arab nations against colonial powers. Just as that movement struggled with internal divisions and varying interests, today’s Muslim nations face similar challenges. Unity among these nations could lend strength to long-marginalized causes, especially the Palestinian struggle, and reshape the narrative surrounding conflicts in Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan (Khamis, Ang, & Welling, 2016).

But one must ask: could this potential unity lead to a more profound stability in the region, or might it instead ignite further conflict, as different ideologies clash within the coalition?

Strengthening Collective Voices

On one hand, a united Muslim front could serve as a powerful voice in international forums, advocating for changes to established structures that have historically favored Western powers. Enhanced economic cooperation could lead to alternative trade routes, reducing dependency on Western markets and fostering regional self-sufficiency. Think of this as a group of musicians, each playing their own tune, suddenly coming together to create a symphony that resonates powerfully enough to be heard across continents.

The potential for a stronger collective voice may transform global discourse, challenging the ideological underpinnings of neoliberalism by promoting principles of equity, shared prosperity, and social justice. Just as the rise of economic blocs like the European Union reshaped trade dynamics and political relations in the late 20th century, a united Muslim front could create space for new economic models prioritizing human welfare and sustainable development over profit maximization.

Conversely, increased geopolitical tensions may accompany this unity, as Western powers could perceive such consolidation as a direct threat. Historical grievances and rivalries might resurface, potentially inciting renewed military interventions or exacerbating existing conflicts (Chakrabarty, 1992). The risk of internal divisions rooted in sectarianism or nationalism could further complicate efforts for a cohesive front, undermining the broader anti-imperialist message. Could the very unity sought to challenge external pressures instead become a source of internal strife, much like the fragile alliances seen in pre-World War I Europe?

Regional cooperation could extend beyond political alliances. Emphasizing common interests in areas such as environmental sustainability, education, and economic development could foster a collaborative spirit among nations that transcends traditional rivalries. This shift could promote peace and stability, offering an alternative vision of the future grounded in mutual aid and shared progress—where nations, like individual threads, weave together a stronger fabric that benefits all rather than fraying at the edges under external pressures.

Strategic Maneuvers for All Players Involved

In light of these rapidly shifting dynamics, strategic maneuvers must be employed by all involved parties:

  • Western Powers: Reevaluating foreign policy is essential. A shift toward diplomacy emphasizing engagement, dialogue, and mutual respect could prevent further destabilization. Consider how the post-World War II Marshall Plan helped rebuild Europe not just through financial aid, but by fostering cooperation and trust among nations. Similarly, a genuine commitment to addressing the socioeconomic disparities exacerbated by neoliberal policies is crucial for long-term stability.

  • Muslim-majority Countries: Promoting internal cohesion while avoiding authoritarianism will be paramount. Just as the Arab Spring highlighted the populations’ yearning for dignity and participation, transparent governance, respect for human rights, and social justice must be prioritized to build legitimacy alongside their populations’ needs. Exploring avenues for economic cooperation is vital for bolstering collective economic growth and decreasing reliance on Western markets, reminiscent of how ASEAN has successfully promoted regional integration in Southeast Asia.

  • Regional Organizations: The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) should actively engage in conflict resolution and foster unity based on shared interests. Emphasizing collaborative solutions can enhance the voices of marginalized communities while promoting peace rather than division. Can the OIC take a page from the European Union’s approach to conflict resolution and cooperation, becoming a unifying force rather than a mere discussion forum?

  • Activists and Grassroots Movements: Advocating for inclusive policies and social justice remains critical, pressing governments to adopt humane policies reflective of their populations’ aspirations. As seen in the success of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States, grassroots activism can catalyze significant policy changes when aligned with the people’s will. How can modern movements harness social media and technology to amplify their impact and reach?

Conclusion

The challenges of the current geopolitical climate demand a multifaceted approach focused on diplomacy, cooperation, and a renewed commitment to human rights. Reflecting on historical precedents, consider the Marshall Plan after World War II, which not only rebuilt European economies but also fostered political stability and cooperation among nations. Similarly, the future of the Muslim world hinges on leveraging positive economic growth to fund social welfare programs while simultaneously implementing regulations that mitigate the risks of market failures. Just as the post-war recovery relied on a delicate balance of investment and oversight, so too must we adopt strategies that ensure equity and justice prevail in our contemporary landscape. Only through such balanced strategies can we hope to navigate the complexities of the current environment and build a future that honors the dignity and potential of all individuals.

References

Baccaro, L. (2014). Similar structures, different outcomes: corporatism’s resilience and transformation (1974–2005). Review of Keynesian Economics. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.05

Brown, W. (2006). American Nightmare. Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591706293016

Chakrabarty, D. (1992). Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for “Indian” Pasts?. Representations. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928652

Conversi, D. (2011). Majoritarian democracy and globalization versus ethnic diversity?. Democratization. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.626947

Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2016). Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of Social Media Influencers. Celebrity Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292

Mayer, M. (2009). The ‘Right to the City’ in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982755

Mud, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012). Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11

Neufeld, M. (1999). Democratization in/of Canadian Foreign Policy: Critical Reflections. Studies in Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.1999.11675276

Pulido, L. (2016). Flint, Environmental Racism, and Racial Capitalism. Capitalism Nature Socialism. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1213013

Zine, J. (2006). Unveiled Sentiments: Gendered Islamophobia and Experiences of Veiling among Muslim Girls in a Canadian Islamic School. Equity & Excellence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680600788503

← Prev Next →