Muslim World Report

U.S. Risks Being Classified as an Electoral Autocracy

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Mar 19, 2025 10:50 AM | 16 min read | 3385 words

TL;DR: A recent report signals the alarming potential for the U.S. to be classified as an “electoral autocracy,” raising global concerns about the erosion of democracy. The report highlights voter suppression, manipulation of public opinion, and the implications these actions have for international democratic norms. If this shift occurs, it may embolden authoritarian regimes and fundamentally alter the geopolitical landscape. However, there is also the possibility that this crisis might inspire a resurgence of global democratic movements.

The Erosion of Democracy: A Wake-Up Call for the World

A recent report from the Varieties of Democracy project has sounded the alarm on a very real crisis: the United States, long positioned as a beacon of democracy globally, faces the grim prospect of being classified as an “electoral autocracy.” This significant shift has been fueled by political turmoil, particularly under the influence of former President Donald Trump, whose actions have sparked a profound erosion of democratic norms at an alarming pace (Lieberman et al., 2018).

Historically, the decline of democratic institutions often follows a familiar pattern, as seen in countries like Venezuela or Hungary, where charismatic leaders exploited crises to consolidate power, undermining the checks and balances that protect democracy. The observations made by Staffan Lindberg and others highlight a rapid deterioration that typically unfolds over years in other nations yet is occurring in the U.S. at an unprecedented rate. This alarming trend challenges the foundational principles of democracy worldwide and reshapes geopolitical dynamics, raising the question: if a nation once regarded as a paragon of democracy can falter so swiftly, what does this mean for the future of democratic governance globally?

The report underscores several disturbing trends, including:

  • Revival of voter suppression tactics reminiscent of Jim Crow laws. Just as the discriminatory practices of the early 20th century targeted marginalized communities to disenfranchise them, modern tactics seek to achieve similar ends under the guise of voter integrity.
  • Manipulative social media strategies designed to distort public opinion (Howe, 2017). These techniques echo the propaganda efforts of totalitarian regimes that twist truth to control the populace, highlighting a troubling parallel in how information can be weaponized in democratic societies.

These actions undermine trust in the electoral process within the U.S., setting concerning precedents for countries grappling with their own democratic integrity. As the U.S. navigates this precarious path, one must ask: What does it truly mean to protect democracy if the very mechanisms that support it are being eroded? The implications of the U.S. slipping into this new classification extend beyond its borders, raising critical questions about what constitutes democracy and the role of external influences in domestic affairs (Druckman et al., 2023).

Global Implications of U.S. Autocracy

Internationally, the U.S. has historically served as a stabilizing force in promoting democratic ideals, much like a lighthouse guiding ships through turbulent waters. A diminished status could embolden authoritarian regimes, subsequently encouraging the normalization of autocratic practices in nations already drifting from democratic principles (Diamond, 2022). For instance, consider the aftermath of the Cold War; as the U.S. championed democracy, countries in Eastern Europe, buoyed by American support, transitioned from authoritarianism to vibrant democracies. Conversely, should the U.S. retreat from its role, we might witness a ripple effect, where:

  • Countries in the Global South with fragile democratic institutions may take cues from the U.S. experience, leading to further erosion of their own frameworks, much like dominos falling in a chain reaction (Meléndez & Rovira Kaltwasser, 2021). This raises the question: if the world’s leading democracy falters, who will stand firm against the tide of autocracy?

  • Alliances built on shared democratic values may weaken, raising the stakes for international cooperation in addressing pressing global issues such as climate change, human rights, and economic inequality. Are we prepared to face these global challenges without the unifying force of a steadfast democratic ally?

What If the U.S. Is Declared an Electoral Autocracy?

If the United States officially transitions to the designation of an “electoral autocracy,” the ramifications would be immediate and severe. This shift would signal to the world that the U.S. can no longer uphold its self-proclaimed role as the guardian of democracy (Swyngedouw, 2009). Imagine a once-vibrant garden, tended meticulously over generations, suddenly choked by weeds; this is what the global perception of American democracy would resemble. The implications would ripple across international borders, undermining decades of diplomatic efforts to promote democratic values worldwide. How would this affect nations that look to the U.S. for inspiration? Would they falter in their own democratic aspirations, or would they double down as examples of civic resilience? This potential shift raises critical questions about the future of democratic ideals globally.

Consequences of Diminished Status

A diminished status could lead to:

  • Significant decrease in American influence, politically and culturally.
  • Empowerment of authoritarian regimes to assert that democracy is merely a façade employed by Western powers to exert control (Kneuer, 2021).
  • Erosion of key institutions designed to safeguard democracy, such as the judiciary, media, and civil society organizations (Byrne, 2020).

This deterioration may fuel public disillusionment and exacerbate societal divisions, leading to increased polarization. Citizens awakening to the threat to their fundamental rights may rise, creating a volatile environment that destabilizes American society. Just as the fall of the Roman Empire led to a fracturing of political unity and a resurgence of autocratic leaders in the territories it once dominated, a similar decline in American democratic ideals could usher in a new era of instability, both domestically and abroad.

Moreover, a global perception of the U.S. as an electoral autocracy may embolden other nations to abandon democratic reforms (Greitens, 2020). Authoritarian regimes in countries such as Hungary and Turkey could find validation in the U.S.’s decline, fostering a dangerous cycle of autocratic governance. As history shows, when a beacon of democracy falters, as the U.S. is at risk of doing, will allies and partners who once looked to it for guidance hesitate to align themselves with a nation appearing to repudiate democratic ideals (Treisman, 2023; O’Connor & Başer, 2018)? The echoes of history remind us that the loss of democratic integrity in one nation can ripple across the globe, inviting backsliding in even the staunchest of democracies.

What If Global Democratic Movements Gain Momentum?

Conversely, the alarming assessment of American democracy might catalyze a resurgence of democratic movements worldwide. Just as the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 inspired a wave of democratic uprisings across Eastern Europe, the current challenges facing the U.S. could serve as a powerful rallying point for activists in various countries, particularly those experiencing democratic backsliding. These activists could invoke the American ideals of liberty and representation to galvanize their efforts, transforming disillusionment into action (Warburton, 2022). Could it be that the very struggles of one nation might ignite the hope of another, much like a single spark can set ablaze a field of dry grass?

Potential Effects of Momentum

This development could lead to:

  • Increased visibility of the struggle for democracy in the U.S., akin to the way the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s illuminated social injustices and inspired global calls for equality. Just as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s message resonated across borders, today’s democratic movements could encourage citizens in authoritarian regimes to demand greater accountability, transparency, and civil rights.
  • Enhanced international solidarity among democratic movements, resulting in more coordinated efforts to challenge oppressive regimes, reminiscent of the global cooperation seen during the fall of the Berlin Wall, which united various factions in their quest for freedom.
  • Strengthening commitments to democratic principles and human rights from international organizations, like the United Nations (Cheeseman et al., 2021), reflecting the urgency once felt during the establishment of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.

However, challenges remain. The rise of authoritarianism, fueled by disinformation and repression, complicates the landscape for democratic movements (Mikuli, 2020). Advocates may face increased pushback from regimes threatened by activism. As history has shown, movements for change often come at a price—are we prepared to face the potential sacrifices necessary to realize a more democratic future? This creates a critical juncture for global politics, echoing the decisive moments that have shaped nations throughout history.

Strategic Maneuvers for All Players Involved

In response to these potential shifts in global democracy, various actors must adopt strategic maneuvers to navigate this evolving landscape. For the United States, the priority should be:

  • Reevaluating and reinforcing its democratic institutions. Just as the Roman Republic faced internal strife that ultimately led to its transformation into an empire, the U.S. must learn from history and ensure its institutions remain resilient against erosion.
  • Encouraging bipartisan efforts to restore election integrity. Imagine a ship in stormy seas: without a united crew, it risks capsizing. Only through collaboration across party lines can the U.S. navigate the turbulent waters of electoral challenges.
  • Promoting voter access and safeguarding civil liberties (Isaac, 2016). In a time when voter suppression tactics have been likened to barriers on a racetrack, removing these obstacles is essential for ensuring a fair competition in the democratic process.

Engaging in transparent dialogue with international allies and civil society will not only help re-establish trust in U.S. democratic practices but also serve as a beacon of hope in a world where democratic ideals are increasingly under threat. How will the U.S. demonstrate its commitment to democracy when its very foundations are being scrutinized?

Global Solidarity and Resilience

Countries facing similar democratic challenges should seek solidarity through shared experiences. Strengthening networks among democracies and establishing mutual support mechanisms can empower grassroots movements and enhance resilience against authoritarian tendencies (Morrison, 2021).

This concept of democratic resilience draws parallels to the way ecosystems endure disturbances. Just as a diverse forest can recover from a fire by relying on its interconnected roots and the regeneration of its species, so too can democracies bolster their core values by building strong networks of support. The erosion of democratic norms in the U.S. invites broader reflection on resilience in an increasingly authoritarian global landscape. How might the lessons learned from past struggles, such as the fall of the Berlin Wall, serve as a guide for today’s democracies in fortifying their institutions against rising authoritarianism? In these times, the need for solidarity among nations facing similar threats is not merely beneficial—it is essential for survival.

The Role of Digital Advocacy and Social Media

In the contemporary landscape, digital advocacy and social media play critical roles in fostering democratic movements and strengthening accountability. Much like the printing press revolutionized access to information in the 15th century, enabling the spread of revolutionary ideas, social media has empowered modern activists to connect, share information, and mobilize support at an unprecedented scale. The ability to disseminate information rapidly and organize collective action online has become essential in combating authoritarianism; for instance, during the Arab Spring, platforms like Twitter and Facebook were instrumental in rallying protests that challenged long-standing regimes. As we navigate this digital age, one must ask: how might the landscape of democracy evolve if digital advocacy continues to flourish, or conversely, if it faces increasing censorship?

The Potential for Digital Platforms

For instance:

  • Global hashtags and movements on platforms like Twitter or Instagram unify disparate movements, much like the way the printing press enabled the spread of revolutionary ideas during the Enlightenment.
  • Social media visibility can pressure governments to respond, akin to how the televised images of the Civil Rights Movement galvanized public opinion and forced legislative change in the 1960s.
  • Platforms that promote civic engagement educate the public about democratic principles and counteract efforts to undermine democracy, much like town halls and community forums did in earlier democratic societies.

However, challenges persist. Disinformation campaigns, state-sponsored propaganda, and censorship create barriers to effective advocacy (Mikuli, 2020). Just as the early abolitionists faced backlash from pro-slavery advocates, today’s activists must navigate these complexities while remaining committed to democratic ideals. The interplay between digital activism and traditional forms of protest will shape the outcomes of democratic movements, but can one thrive without the other in an age dominated by digital noise?

The Intersection with International Relations

As the situation unfolds domestically in the U.S., the landscape of international relations is also evolving. The U.S.’s reputation as a global leader in democracy is being questioned, much like the way the Roman Empire’s political turmoil in the late 3rd century prompted provinces to reconsider their loyalties and seek stability elsewhere. Today, countries reassessing their alliances may seek alternative partnerships based on the current political climate. How many nations will look towards emerging powers for collaboration, and will this shift fundamentally alter the balance of global influence?

Broader Geopolitical Implications

  • Authoritarian regimes may see the U.S.’s decline as an opportunity to forge new alliances, reminiscent of how Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany aligned in the 1930s to counterbalance the influence of the democratic powers. This historical shift illustrates how weakened democratic nations can inadvertently empower non-democratic governance.
  • The normalization of autocratic practices could lead to a different global order where respect for human rights is diminished. Just as the rise of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century reshaped the global landscape, today’s trends suggest a potential resurgence of similar ideologies. What will this mean for the future of democracy? Will we witness a return to an era where the voices of the oppressed are silenced and the ideals of freedom become relics of the past?

The Economic Implications of Democratic Backsliding

The erosion of democracy isn’t just a political concern; it has significant economic implications as well. A decline in democratic institutions can lead to:

  • Economic instability due to unpredictable governance.
  • A deterrent effect on foreign investment stemming from political volatility.

Consider the case of Venezuela, where a gradual erosion of democratic practices has culminated in hyperinflation and economic collapse. Once one of the wealthiest countries in South America, Venezuela’s descent into authoritarianism has deterred foreign investors, leading to a drastic reduction in economic activity.

Within the U.S., economic disillusionment may increase as trust in institutions wanes. According to a 2021 survey, a staggering 70% of Americans expressed concern that their country is moving toward an authoritarian government. The cycle of discontent relating to economic inequality often correlates with democratic backsliding, ultimately impacting economic growth. As citizens become increasingly disillusioned with their leaders, one must ask: what happens to our economy when the very foundation of democracy begins to crumble?

Addressing the Intersection of Democracy and Economics

As the world navigates these turbulent waters, addressing the intersection of democracy and economics becomes crucial. Just as a ship needs both a sturdy hull and a skilled crew to withstand stormy seas, a healthy democracy requires inclusive economic policies that engage citizens at every level. The emphasis on citizen engagement can reinforce democratic principles and mitigate the risks of authoritarianism. History teaches us valuable lessons in this regard; for instance, the post-World War II reconstruction in Western Europe, particularly through the Marshall Plan, not only revitalized economies but also strengthened democratic institutions by fostering citizen participation and reducing disenfranchisement. In this light, could we argue that economic engagement is not just a policy choice but a safeguard for democracy itself?

Fostering Global Solidarity Among Democratic Movements

Fostering global solidarity among democratic movements remains crucial. Just as a forest thrives when its trees grow close together, providing support and protection from harsh winds, democratic nations can enhance their resilience against authoritarian encroachments by standing united. Historical commonalities, such as the struggle against colonialism in the mid-20th century, where nations like India and Ghana shared strategies and support, can serve as a base for collaboration among countries experiencing similar challenges today. By sharing strategies, nations can echo the successful anti-apartheid efforts of the 1980s, where global solidarity played a pivotal role in dismantling oppressive regimes. How might today’s democratic movements leverage these past lessons to forge stronger alliances and protect their freedoms?

Building Platforms for Collaboration

  • International events, summits, and coalitions focusing on democratic governance provide platforms for activists, much like the historical gatherings of the League of Nations, which sought to promote peace and cooperation after World War I. These early efforts, although ultimately limited in success, laid the groundwork for future alliances and collaborations.
  • Establishing shared goals enhances movement effectiveness, creating a united front against threats to democracy, similar to how the Civil Rights Movement galvanized diverse groups around the single aim of equality in the 1960s.

Ultimately, the power of collective action becomes paramount. Just as the Berlin Wall—once a physical barrier—fell due to the relentless pressure from global and local solidarity, collaboration across borders, coupled with grassroots activism, can redefine the trajectory of democracy in the face of adversity. Are we prepared to harness that same spirit of unity in today’s fragmented political landscape?

Conclusion: A Critical Juncture for Global Politics

As the world watches closely to see whether the promise of democracy can be upheld amid growing authoritarianism, it is imperative to confront the reality of a nation grappling with its identity. America stands at a critical juncture, reminiscent of the tumultuous post-World War II era when nations emerged from conflict, questioning their governance and values. The decisions made in the coming years will resonate far beyond its borders. With the erosion of democratic norms in the U.S. serving as both a warning and a rallying point, the stakes for global democracy have never been higher.

Through strategic responses, adaptive movements, and international solidarity, there exists the potential for a renaissance of democratic ideals. Much like the rebirth of European democracies following centuries of monarchy and totalitarianism, today’s global landscape demands a renewed commitment to democratic values. As we move forward, it is crucial to challenge narratives that seek to undermine the very principles of freedom and democracy that have shaped societies for generations. Will we rise to the occasion, much like those who fought for civil rights in the 1960s, or will we allow the tides of authoritarianism to sweep us away? The ongoing dialogue around democracy’s resilience and commitment to democratic values can pave the way to a more hopeful future.

References

  • Brown, P., & Zavestoski, S. (2004). Social movements in health: an introduction. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(6), 740-755.
  • Byrne, G. (2020). Surveillance, Security, and Liberal Democracy in the Post-COVID World. International Organization, 74(4), 865-883.
  • Castle, M. (2011). Abortion in the United States’ bible belt: organizing for power and empowerment. Reproductive Health, 8(1), 1-5.
  • Cheeseman, N., Matfess, H., & Amani, A. (2021). Tanzania: The Roots of Repression. Journal of Democracy, 32(3), 27-41.
  • Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s Definitional Dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1-20.
  • Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., & Iyengar, S. (2023). Does Affective Polarization Contribute to Democratic Backsliding in America?. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 700(1), 181-202.
  • Diamond, L. (2022). Democracy’s Arc: From Resurgent to Imperiled. Journal of Democracy, 33(2), 92-106.
  • Greitens, S. C. (2020). Surveillance, Security, and Liberal Democracy in the Post-COVID World. International Organization, 74(4), 865-883.
  • Howe, P. D. (2017). Eroding Norms and Democratic Deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 16-30.
  • Isaac, J. C. (2016). Political Power and Social Classes. Perspectives on Politics, 14(4), 981-990.
  • Kneuer, M. (2021). Unravelling democratic erosion: who drives the slow death of democracy, and how?. Democratization, 28(2), 235-250.
  • Lieberman, R. C., Mettler, S., Pepinsky, T. B., Roberts, K. M., & Valelly, R. M. (2018). The Trump Presidency and American Democracy: A Historical and Comparative Analysis. Perspectives on Politics, 16(3), 702-728.
  • Meléndez, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2021). Negative partisanship towards the populist radical right and democratic resilience in Western Europe. Democratization, 28(3), 451-467.
  • Mikuli, P. (2020). Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 18(1), 32-53.
  • Morrison, M. (2021). The Role of Social Movements in Democratic Progress. Journal of Democracy, 32(4), 42-57.
  • O’Connor, F., & Başer, B. (2018). Communal violence and ethnic polarization before and after the 2015 elections in Turkey: attacks against the HDP and the Kurdish population. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(1), 87-103.
  • Plattner, M. F. (2015). Is Democracy in Decline?. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 5-16.
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The Political Economy and Political Ecology of the Hydro-Social Cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 142, 11-28.
  • Treisman, D. (2023). How Great is the Current Danger to Democracy? Assessing the Risk With Historical Data. Comparative Political Studies, 56(2), 185-218.
  • Warburton, E. (2022). Indonesia in 2021. Asian Survey, 62(1), 61-67.
← Prev Next →