Muslim World Report

Rethinking Mental Health: The Impact of Capitalism on Care

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 8, 2025 10:49 AM | 8 min read | 1658 words

TL;DR: This blog post critically examines the influence of capitalism on mental health care, advocating for a shift toward holistic and community-focused approaches. It discusses the detrimental effects of profit-driven models and proposes scenarios for a more equitable future, emphasizing the need for comprehensive reforms to prioritize mental well-being.

The Complex Interplay of Mental Health and Capitalism: A Call for Holistic Understanding

In recent years, the discourse surrounding mental health has increasingly acknowledged the vital role that societal structures play in individual well-being, particularly within the framework of capitalism. Many mental health professionals agree that mental unwellness cannot be disentangled from socio-economic conditions. A structuralist approach to social work underscores the importance of viewing mental health not merely as a consequence of biochemical imbalances but as deeply embedded in systemic issues such as poverty, alienation, and the inherent injustices of capitalist frameworks (Mock, 2022; Matthews, 2019).

Capitalism, a system rife with competition and commodification, produces environments characterized by:

  • Stress
  • Alienation
  • Insecurity

This leads to widespread mental health struggles. Marxist critiques applied to modern society highlight how capitalism fosters an economic paradigm that prioritizes productivity over genuine well-being (Matthews, 2019). As workers navigate a relentless cycle of labor, they are often reduced to mere cogs within a machine, functioning solely to meet economic demands while their emotional and psychological needs are neglected. This commodification extends to mental health care itself, where complex human experiences are often simplified to mere diagnoses and prescriptions aimed at maintaining compliance rather than fostering genuine recovery.

Yet, it is crucial to approach this conversation with nuance. Acknowledging that capitalism exacerbates mental health issues does not negate the existence of mental illnesses that arise independently of economic conditions. Conditions such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) provide a poignant example; these conditions possess intricate neurobiological components that must be addressed independently of economic factors (Williams et al., 1997). Personal experiences, such as those of individuals whose brains do not produce necessary chemicals for enjoyment, exemplify that effective psychiatric treatment and medication are vital for achieving a baseline quality of life and should not be dismissed as mere products of a capitalist agenda.

Exploring ‘What If’ Scenarios

What if Mental Health Care Were Prioritized Over Profit?

Imagine a world where mental health care is treated with the same urgency and funding as physical health care. In such a scenario, the allocation of resources could fundamentally shift, providing everyone access to comprehensive mental health services free from the constraints of profit-driven models. This could transform the landscape of mental well-being, allowing individuals to seek help without fear of stigma or financial burden. The potential benefits include:

  • Reduced emergency room visits due to mental health crises
  • Alleviation of pressure on healthcare systems

What if Capitalism Were Reformed for Equitable Outcomes?

What if capitalism were restructured to prioritize human well-being over economic gain? Envision a model where policies aimed at:

  • Reducing poverty
  • Enhancing job security
  • Providing equitable access to mental health services

were the norm. A society that emphasizes these social policies could potentially foster resilience among individuals grappling with both systemic challenges and personal struggles. With supportive frameworks in place, individuals might find it easier to navigate their mental health journeys without the exacerbating factors of economic insecurity weighing them down.

What if Mental Health Disorders Were Fully Understood as Biopsychosocial Constructs?

Consider a paradigm where mental health disorders are comprehensively understood as biopsychosocial constructs, encompassing biological, psychological, and social dimensions. This holistic perspective could lead to more personalized treatment options that consider all aspects of an individual’s experience. In this scenario, therapy could be integrated with medical treatment and community support, fostering an environment where recovery is not just about managing symptoms but achieving genuine health and flourishing.

What if Societal Stigma Around Mental Health Were Eliminated?

Imagine the implications of a society where the stigma surrounding mental health issues was eradicated. If conversations about mental health were normalized, individuals might feel empowered to seek help early on, reducing the prevalence of severe mental health crises. This cultural shift could enhance overall societal health and well-being, creating a collective understanding that mental health is as vital as physical health.

This duality necessitates recognition and understanding. While capitalism undoubtedly contributes to systems of alienation that worsen mental health, the arguments that all mental health issues can be traced back to economic factors run the risk of oversimplification. Such reductionism could potentially marginalize individuals whose conditions arise independently from socio-economic stressors, further complicating their path to receiving appropriate care. A balanced approach that incorporates systemic change alongside individualized mental health care is paramount (LaMontagne et al., 2014).

Historically, the intersection of capitalism and mental health has witnessed significant shifts, particularly post-World War II with an increasing reliance on welfare capitalism (Carpenter, 2000). While the post-war social safety nets aimed to provide support, they often fell short due to neoliberal policies that prioritized austerity over holistic care frameworks. The reformation of mental health policies has shown that welfare systems must adapt to be responsive to the complex realities of modern living, as seen in various global contexts (Jenkins et al., 2007; Kiem & Austin, 2013).

The Role of Community and Individual Resilience

Community-oriented mental health initiatives have emerged as critical components in addressing the profound effects of capitalism on mental health. Such measures not only provide essential support but also foster resilience among individuals facing systemic challenges. Programs that promote social cohesion, community engagement, and access to mental health resources can mitigate the negative impacts of socio-economic pressures.

What If Community Engagement Became a Norm?

Consider a future where community engagement is seen as a standard practice for promoting mental health. In this scenario, communities might actively participate in developing local mental health initiatives, ensuring that the unique needs of their populations are met. This could transform the way individuals interact with mental health resources, moving away from a model of isolation and towards one of collective support.

What If Mental Health Education Were Integrated into Schools?

Imagine if mental health education were integrated into school curricula from a young age. Students would learn about emotional intelligence, resilience, and coping mechanisms as part of their standard education. Such knowledge could equip future generations with the tools necessary to navigate the complexities of mental health, potentially reducing the prevalence of mental health issues stemming from ignorance and stigma.

The Need for Comprehensive, Community-Oriented Mental Health Initiatives

To address these intertwined realities, it is imperative to advocate for a societal framework that emphasizes mental well-being while simultaneously critiquing and reforming the economic systems contributing to mental health crises. This includes promoting social policies that alleviate poverty, enhance job security, and provide equitable access to mental health services. Supporting comprehensive, community-oriented mental health initiatives can mitigate the pervasive effects of capitalism, fostering resilience among individuals grappling with both systemic challenges and personal struggles (McDonough, 2000; Gross & Mothersill, 2023).

The Future of Mental Health Under Capitalism

As we look to the future, the relationship between mental health and capitalism will remain a critical area of examination. The ongoing discourse surrounding mental health will require an openness to reimagining existing structures that have historically perpetuated inequity and suffering. Acknowledging the complexities of mental health issues while advocating for systemic change will be vital to moving forward.

What If Future Policies Addressed Mental Health Holistically?

What if future policies were designed to address mental health holistically, considering social determinants, economic factors, and individual experiences? This integrated approach could lead to more effective interventions that recognize the multifaceted nature of mental health. Policymakers could create environments that support mental well-being while addressing core socio-economic issues that contribute to mental health crises.

The Call for an Equitable and Compassionate Mental Health Framework

A proactive, integrated approach is essential: one that combines comprehensive societal reforms with compassionate, individualized mental health care. By striving for a socio-economic structure rooted in equity and community support, we can create an environment where individuals are not merely surviving but flourishing. This vision aligns with a socialist framework advocating both social justice and individual health—a society where mental health care is not merely a temporary band-aid on the wounds inflicted by capitalism but a genuine commitment to the well-being of every member of our communities.

In conclusion, the path toward meaningful mental health reform demands a commitment to unraveling the complexities of human experience. It is only by recognizing the interplay of societal conditions and individual needs that we can move toward a more just and equitable system—one that prioritizes mental health care as a fundamental human right, ensuring that all individuals have the opportunity not just to exist but to thrive.

References

  • Carpenter, M. (2000). ‘It’s a small world’: mental health policy under welfare capitalism since 1945. Sociology of Health & Illness. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00222
  • Gross, N., & Mothersill, D. (2023). Surveillance Capitalism in Mental Health: When Good Apps Go Rogue (and What Can Be Done about It). Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12120679
  • Jenkins, R., Lancashire, S., McDaid, D., Samyshkin, Y., Green, S., Watkins, J., Potasheva, A., Nikiforov, A., Bobylova, Z., Gafurov, V., Goldberg, D., Huxley, P., & Lucas, J. D. (2007). Mental health reform in the Russian Federation: an integrated approach to achieve social inclusion and recovery. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.06.039156
  • Kiem, A. D., & Austin, E. (2013). Drought and the future of rural communities: Opportunities and challenges for climate change adaptation in regional Victoria, Australia. Global Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.003
  • LaMontagne, A. D., Martín, À., Page, K. M., Reavley, N., Noblet, A., Milner, A., Keegel, T., & Smith, P. (2014). Workplace mental health: developing an integrated intervention approach. BMC Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-14-131
  • Matthews, D. (2019). Capitalism and Mental Health. Monthly Review. https://doi.org/10.14452/mr-070-08-2019-01_5
  • McDonough, P. (2000). Job Insecurity and Health. International Journal of Health Services. https://doi.org/10.2190/bpfg-x3me-lhta-6rpv
  • Mock, B. (2022). Sedated: How Modern Capitalism Created Our Mental Health Crisis. Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2139905
  • Williams, J. W., et al. (1997). The role of neurobiology in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review of the literature. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 20(2), 345-362.
← Prev Next →