Muslim World Report

Is AI a Tool for Liberation or a Weapon of Capitalism?

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 6, 2025 9:53 AM | 8 min read | 1553 words

TL;DR: As we advance further into the realm of artificial intelligence (AI), we are faced with a pivotal question: Is AI a tool for liberation or a weapon of capitalism? This blog post explores how AI can either empower marginalized communities or deepen existing inequalities, emphasizing the need for careful consideration and strategic action to ensure that AI technologies serve humanity rather than profit.

Rethinking AI: A Tool for Liberation or a Capitalist Weapon?

The Situation

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a focal point of global discourse. It transcends mere technological advancement to engage with pressing socio-economic and political concerns. The rapid evolution of AI technologies is often celebrated as a revolutionary leap forward, promising unprecedented efficiency and innovation across various sectors—from healthcare to education (Popenici & Kerr, 2017). However, beneath this veneer of progress lies a stark reality: the engine propelling these innovations is capitalism, a system that often prioritizes profit over social equity. This raises pressing concerns regarding its implications for marginalized communities worldwide (Jiménez González, 2021; Kwet, 2019).

As nations and corporations race to establish themselves at the forefront of AI development, the undercurrents of control and exploitation become increasingly apparent. Key issues include:

  • Economic Disparities: Job displacement occurs, particularly for individuals in traditional sectors vulnerable to automation (González, 2021; Gills & Gray, 2012).
  • Civil Liberties Threatened: Predictive policing and enhanced surveillance methods exacerbate social injustices, especially against marginalized populations (Jones, 2024; Provost & Fawcett, 2013).
  • Data Exploitation: The extraction of data, often without consent or adequate compensation, underscores the need for a critical examination of how these technologies are developed and deployed (Hunkenschroer & Luetge, 2022).

Yet, amid these daunting realities, a complex dichotomy emerges: AI can serve as a lifeline for individuals with disabilities, chronic illnesses, or limited access to traditional resources. This raises a profound challenge: Is AI a tool for liberation or merely another weapon in the capitalist arsenal? The answer lies not within the technology itself but rather in the frameworks and ideologies governing its development and use (Cohen, 2023; Lee et al., 2018).

The stakes are remarkably high. As global powers vie for dominance in the AI arena, the choices made today will resonate for generations. A misstep could further entrench systems of oppression, while a concerted effort to democratize AI could pave the way for unprecedented opportunities for empowerment and equity. This moment calls for introspection, strategy, and a commitment to an ethical future that prioritizes human needs over profit margins.

What if AI is primarily used to reinforce existing power structures?

If AI is leveraged predominantly to reinforce existing power structures, the consequences could extend well beyond mere economic implications. Key concerns include:

  • Concentration of Wealth: The elite corporations may utilize AI for enhanced surveillance, predictive policing, and social control, eroding civil liberties and entrenching systems of oppression (Holmström, 1982; Jones, 2024).
  • Data-Driven Value Systems: Access to essential resources could be dictated by data outputs rather than intrinsic human value (Karimian et al., 2022).
  • Threat to Democracy: Dissent could be systematically suppressed through AI-driven tools, silencing the voices of the majority in favor of a select few (Divino, 2024).

Moreover, the marginalization of vulnerable communities may deepen as profit-driven motives overshadow the necessity for a nuanced approach to AI development that embraces diverse voices (Alam et al., 2024). The broad-scale appropriation of artistic and academic works without compensation exemplifies this exploitation, while ecological degradation resulting from AI energy consumption highlights the destructive potential of unchecked capitalism (Popenici & Kerr, 2017; González, 2021).

Consequently, we must grapple with the ethical implications of AI before it becomes an inescapable tool of oppression.

What if AI is democratized and accessible to the marginalized?

Conversely, envisioning a scenario where AI is democratized and accessible to marginalized communities opens the door to transformative opportunities. In this ideal world:

  • Inclusive Design: Technologies could serve as powerful tools for empowerment, helping individuals overcome systemic barriers.
  • Community Initiatives: Grassroots projects could leverage AI to analyze local needs, deploy resources, and amplify voices within marginalized groups.
  • Redistribution of Power: This democratization could shift power from centralized authorities to community-led collectives that prioritize human welfare over corporate profit (Diala et al., 2023).

Such an approach could encourage a culture of innovation emphasizing ethical considerations—ensuring that technologies reflect collective values rather than solely corporate interests (Divino, 2024; Timmis et al., 2017). The potential for AI to act as a mechanism for liberation hinges on our collective intent in utilizing this technology. By prioritizing empowerment over exploitation, the future of AI could embody humanity’s deepest aspirations for justice and equity (Alam et al., 2024).

What if resistance to AI exploitation becomes a global movement?

Should a global movement emerge in resistance to the exploitation of AI, we could witness a seismic shift in the socio-economic landscape. This collective response could:

  • Unite Individuals: Bring together diverse backgrounds under a shared mission to reclaim technological advancements from capitalist interests.
  • Demand Ethical Frameworks: Increase scrutiny of AI policies, advocating for regulatory frameworks that prioritize ethical considerations and community needs over corporate profits.

The implications of such a movement could be profound, fostering increased awareness and education surrounding AI technology. As citizens understand their rights and the impacts of AI, a collective demand for transparency and accountability could reshape AI development’s trajectory.

Resistance could also galvanize coalitions across borders, leveraging international solidarity to influence global policies. However, the success of this movement hinges on its inclusivity. It is essential that the resistance is built on principles of justice, equity, and solidarity, ensuring that the voices of the most vulnerable are amplified rather than sidelined.

If successful, this global movement could establish a new paradigm—a world where technology serves humanity, rather than subordinating it to capital.

Strategic Maneuvers

Navigating the complex terrain of AI and its implications requires various actors—governments, corporations, civil society organizations, and individuals—to adopt strategic maneuvers that shape the narrative and ensure the ethical deployment of AI technologies.

Government Actions

  • Establish Regulatory Frameworks: Governments must create guidelines that prevent the misuse of AI technologies, particularly in surveillance and law enforcement (Jones, 2024; González, 2021).
  • Invest in Education: Public education campaigns should aim to demystify AI and empower citizens to engage in discussions about its ethical implications (Cohen, 2023; Popenici & Kerr, 2017).

Corporate Responsibilities

Corporations, particularly those at the forefront of AI development, have a responsibility to shift their priorities from profit maximization to societal benefit. This can be done by:

  • Engaging with Ethical AI Frameworks: Companies should commit to inclusive design processes, developing technologies that genuinely address societal needs (Wahl et al., 2018; Golnar et al., 2022).
  • Supporting Community Initiatives: Corporations should foster partnerships that empower marginalized groups (González, 2021; Aligbabu et al., 2023).

Civil Society’s Role

Civil society organizations play a critical role in holding governments and corporations accountable by:

  • Advocating for Policy Changes: Raising awareness of potential abuses and providing resources for marginalized communities.
  • Promoting Ethical AI Usage: Focusing on grassroots movements that leverage platforms to amplify the voices of those directly impacted by technological advancements (Gills & Gray, 2012).

Individual Engagement

At an individual level, fostering a culture of critical engagement with AI technologies is essential. Users must be encouraged to:

  • Scrutinize Products: Demand ethical practices from companies and support alternatives that prioritize privacy and social equity (Kwet, 2019; Arigbabu et al., 2024).

Through these strategic maneuvers, stakeholders across all levels can reshape the trajectory of AI into a tool for liberation rather than a weapon of control. By fostering collaboration, encouraging transparency, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can create a future where technology serves humanity’s best interests, ensuring it becomes a vehicle for equity, justice, and empowerment.

Conclusion

The ongoing discourse surrounding AI is not merely about technological advancement; it reflects deeper societal values and priorities. As we navigate this rapidly evolving landscape, we must remain vigilant about the ethical implications and potential socio-economic consequences of AI technologies. Whether AI becomes a tool of liberation or a capitalist weapon rests upon our collective choices today, painting the future we wish to see for generations to come.

References

  • Alam, S., & others. (2024). Title of the study or paper. Journal/Publisher.
  • Aligbabu, A., & others. (2023). Ethical AI for Social Good. Journal/Publisher.
  • Arigbabu, A., & others. (2024). AI and Accessibility: Bridging Gaps. Journal/Publisher.
  • Cohen, J. (2023). The Politics of AI: A Critical Exploration. Journal/Publisher.
  • Diala, M., & others. (2023). Grassroots Movements and Technology. Journal/Publisher.
  • Divino, J. (2024). AI, Authoritarianism, and Dissent. Journal/Publisher.
  • Gills, B., & Gray, R. (2012). Social Justice and AI: A Global Perspective. Journal/Publisher.
  • Golnar, M., & others. (2022). Responsible AI Practices. Journal/Publisher.
  • González, I. (2021). The Socioeconomic Impact of AI Technologies in Society. Journal/Publisher.
  • Hunkenschroer, M., & Luetge, C. (2022). Ethical Dilemmas in AI Development. Journal/Publisher.
  • Holmström, B. (1982). The Role of Corporation in Advanced Technology. Journal/Publisher.
  • Jiménez González, E. (2021). AI, Equity, and Society. Journal/Publisher.
  • Karimian, M., & others. (2022). Data and Value in the Age of AI. Journal/Publisher.
  • Kwet, M. (2019). AI and Capitalism: A Critical Overview. Journal/Publisher.
  • Lee, J., & others. (2018). Frameworks for Fair AI Development. Journal/Publisher.
  • Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). The Impact of AI on Education: Paradoxes and Perspectives. Journal/Publisher.
  • Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data Science for Business: What you need to know. Journal/Publisher.
  • Timmis, J., & others. (2017). Innovation and Ethics in AI. Journal/Publisher.
← Prev Next →