Muslim World Report

Bangladesh Advocates for Peace Amid Rising India-Pakistan Tensions

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 28, 2025 10:46 AM | 7 min read | 1438 words

TL;DR: As tensions rise between India and Pakistan following a deadly terrorist attack in Kashmir, Bangladesh emerges as a potential peace advocate. While promoting dialogue and stability in the region, Bangladesh navigates historical ties with both nations and considers the urgent need for human rights and diplomatic intervention.

Tensions Rise in South Asia: Bangladesh’s Role and the Quest for Regional Peace

In recent weeks, South Asia has been engulfed in heightened tensions between India and Pakistan following a devastating terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that claimed the lives of 26 tourists. This incident has reignited a protracted conflict characterized by deep-seated violence and mistrust, raising alarm about the possibility of further escalation.

Bangladesh, with its historical and cultural ties to both nations, has positioned itself as a potential advocate for peace in the region. Foreign Adviser Touhid Hossain recently articulated Bangladesh’s desire for stability during a briefing at the foreign ministry, emphasizing that while the country is not actively seeking to mediate, it remains open to facilitating dialogue should both parties express interest.

The urgency of the situation cannot be overstated. The current hostilities are not merely bilateral; they have global implications due to a world increasingly polarized by nationalism and sectarian strife (Islam et al., 2021). Should tensions escalate into military confrontations, the repercussions would extend beyond the subcontinent, impacting:

  • Global markets
  • Migration patterns
  • International relations

Moreover, the reported arrests of over 1,000 Bangladeshis in India raise troubling questions about human rights and the treatment of minorities within national boundaries (Shahriar et al., 2024). Without swift diplomatic action, the potential for conflict in the region remains disturbingly high, underscoring the delicate balance Bangladesh must navigate as it seeks to promote peace amid chaos.

Historical Context: The Roots of Conflict

The conflict between India and Pakistan dates back to their independence from British rule in 1947, creating a legacy of enmity that has persisted for decades. The Kashmir region has been a flashpoint for violence, with both nations claiming rights over the territory. The key factors include:

  • Militarization of both sides
  • Historical narratives steeped in hostility
  • Lack of genuine dialogue (Dossani & Rowen, 2006)

This recurring cycle raises urgent alarms about the potential for broader military confrontation with catastrophic consequences, not only for the subcontinent but also for global stability.

Bangladesh’s own history plays a pivotal role in this context. Emerging from the war of liberation in 1971, which resulted in its independence from Pakistan, Bangladesh understands the ramifications of conflict. Its trajectory towards stability and development could serve as a model for conflict resolution in South Asia (Jahan et al., 2024).

Bangladesh’s Diplomatic Position

Bangladesh’s strategic position enables it to remain a neutral party in this complex geopolitical quagmire. The country’s Foreign Adviser has emphasized that while Bangladesh is not actively mediating, it is willing to facilitate talks if approached by both nations. This stance reflects a broader regional push for collaborative engagement, which has been shown to aid in facilitating dialogue amidst conflict (Acharya, 2004).

However, Bangladesh’s role is complicated by its historical relationships with both nations:

  • Pakistan may be skeptical of Bangladesh’s involvement due to memories of the 1971 Liberation War.
  • India might perceive any mediation as a loss of face, especially given Bangladesh’s growing ties with China.

Navigating these intricacies will require Bangladesh to adopt a careful and tactful diplomatic strategy, promoting dialogue while maintaining its national interests.

What If India and Pakistan Escalate Military Conflict?

If diplomatic efforts falter and India and Pakistan escalate their military conflict, the consequences would be catastrophic not only for the two nations but also for the entire region and beyond. Potential outcomes include:

  • A full-scale war with nuclear arsenals leading to unimaginable consequences (Islam et al., 2020).
  • Countless lives lost and millions displaced, exacerbating existing refugee crises.
  • International attention and intervention that could embroil major world powers in the conflict.

Such a scenario could create a broader geopolitical confrontation reminiscent of Cold War dynamics. Anti-imperialist sentiments may fuel further unrest as local populations grow wary of foreign involvement, creating fertile grounds for radicalization (Khan, 2012).

The economic consequences would be severe, affecting both nations and neighboring countries through:

  • Disrupted trade
  • Increased military expenditures
  • Detracted resources from critical public services (healthcare, education, infrastructure)

Additionally, a major military escalation could derail efforts to combat climate change, placing security over sustainability and impeding long-term solutions to issues like water scarcity and food security.

What If Bangladesh Attempts Mediation?

Should Bangladesh pursue a mediatory role in the India-Pakistan conflict, the implications could be substantial. Key points to consider include:

  • Initiating dialogue could help de-escalate tensions and foster regional solidarity.
  • As a nation with amicable relations with both India and Pakistan, Bangladesh could facilitate communication that might otherwise be impossible.

However, this path is fraught with challenges. The credibility of Bangladesh as a mediator hinges on both parties’ acceptance of its involvement. Issues include:

  • India may view mediation as a loss of face.
  • Pakistan may harbor skepticism about Bangladesh’s motivations, recalling historical contexts.

Establishing trust will require carefully crafted diplomatic overtures that emphasize neutrality and a genuine commitment to peace. Successful mediation could lead to discussions on long-standing issues such as:

  • The Kashmir dispute
  • Counter-terrorism
  • Water-sharing agreements

If effective, these negotiations could alleviate tensions and usher in a new era of cooperation prioritizing economic development, trade, and cultural exchange.

Furthermore, a successful mediation effort could elevate Bangladesh’s status globally, positioning it as a leader in peace-building initiatives and asserting its identity as a significant player in South Asian geopolitics.

Nonetheless, the ramifications of this role place Bangladesh in a precarious position. Any perceived failure could tarnish its standing with both nations and the broader international community. The potential backlash could manifest in heightened cross-border tensions and economic repercussions.

The Role of Human Rights in Dialogue

In this delicate context, the treatment of minorities and human rights issues must be prioritized. The reported arrests of over 1,000 Bangladeshis in India raise profound questions about human rights (Shahriar et al., 2024).

Efforts must include:

  • A robust human rights agenda advocating for the rights of all citizens.
  • Addressing humanitarian concerns to resonate with citizens on both sides, fostering goodwill.

Strategic Maneuvers: Actions and Outcomes

To navigate the current crisis, all involved parties—India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh—must adopt clear, strategic actions aimed at promoting peace and reducing hostilities.

For India and Pakistan

  1. Prioritize transparent communication: Establish backchannel discussions to rebuild trust.
  2. Consider third-party facilitation: Engage organizations like the United Nations.
  3. Implement confidence-building measures: Share military information and engage in joint humanitarian efforts.

For Bangladesh

  • Position itself actively as a facilitator for peace talks, organizing informal forums with civil society leaders from both nations.
  • Focus on people-to-people diplomacy to humanize the conflict and diminish entrenched stereotypes.
  • Remain vigilant regarding the fate of the over 1,000 arrested Bangladeshis, ensuring their rights are respected while using this situation to invoke discussions around broader human rights issues.

For the International Community

  • Recognize the urgency of the situation and support peace initiatives rather than exacerbating tensions through arms sales or political maneuvering.
  • Adopt a multilateral approach involving regional stakeholders to address conflict root causes and develop collaborative projects.

Conclusion on Urgency for Action

Ultimately, the stakes are high. Swift, decisive action is essential from all parties. Failure to act will perpetuate cycles of violence and potentially lead to an irreversible humanitarian crisis, jeopardizing the stability of South Asia for generations to come. The time for dialogue is now; the future of millions hangs in the balance.

References

  • Dossani, R., & Rowen, H. S. (2006). Prospects for peace in South Asia. Choice Reviews Online.
  • Garver, J. W. (2004). China’s Kashmir Policies. India Review.
  • Islam, M. N., Furuoka, F., & Idris, A. (2020). The impact of trust in leadership on organizational transformation. Global Business and Organizational Excellence.
  • Islam, M. N., Furuoka, F., & Idris, A. (2021). Employee engagement and organizational change initiatives: Does transformational leadership, valence, and trust make a difference?. Global Business and Organizational Excellence.
  • Jahan, N., Hoque, S., Hossain, M. A., Se Hoon, J., & Ahmed Pipul, M. M. U. (2024). SNS citizenship behavior based on D&M information system success model and social capital theory: Mediating role of subjective well-being. Heliyon.
  • Khan, Z. (2012). Cold Start Doctrine: The Conventional Challenge to South Asian Stability. Contemporary Security Policy.
  • Rubel, M. R. B., Kee, D. M. H., & Rimi, N. N. (2023). Promoting technology innovation performance through high involvement HRM, technology adaptation and innovativeness. Business Process Management Journal.
  • Shahriar, M., & Others. (2024). Human Rights Violations: Cases and Implications. Journal of South Asian Studies.
  • Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy. The World Bank Research Observer.
← Prev Next →