Muslim World Report

India and UK Finalize Historic Free Trade Agreement

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | May 7, 2025 9:42 AM | 11 min read | 2206 words

TL;DR: On May 6, 2025, India and the UK finalized a historic free trade agreement (FTA) aimed at enhancing economic ties and reshaping global trade dynamics post-Brexit. The FTA is expected to increase market access for Indian goods, boost sectors like textiles and pharmaceuticals, and improve the UK’s access to India’s growing market. However, potential challenges include domestic backlash in the UK and competitive responses from nations like China.

The India-UK Free Trade Agreement: A Double-Edged Sword

On Tuesday, May 6, 2025, India and the United Kingdom reached a milestone in their economic relationship by finalizing a historic free trade agreement (FTA). This significant development, marked by discussions between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, is being hailed as a transformative step for both nations. The FTA aims to nurture a comprehensive strategic partnership that enhances trade and investment flows, with expectations of:

  • Stimulating economic growth
  • Creating jobs
  • Fostering innovation

Amid the UK’s quest to revitalize its economy post-Brexit, this agreement is seen as a pivotal pivot toward strengthening ties with rapidly growing economies like India (Alam et al., 2024; Yadav et al., 2018).

The anticipated implications of the agreement extend well beyond mere bilateral trade dynamics. They symbolize a substantial geopolitical realignment in a world characterized by globalization and the lingering impacts of colonial legacies. As nations seek to navigate the post-pandemic economic landscape, the India-UK FTA could potentially reshape existing trade routes and alliances. This strategic maneuver can be interpreted as part of the West’s broader strategy to counterbalance China’s growing economic clout in Asia, mirroring historical patterns of former colonial powers deepening ties with their erstwhile colonies (Aggarwal & Evenett, 2013; Scott, 2017).

With projections indicating that the FTA is expected to significantly enhance market access for Indian goods in the UK, key sectors such as:

  • Textiles
  • Pharmaceuticals

may see considerable growth. Conversely, the UK stands to gain improved access to India’s burgeoning market, driven by a rising middle class and increasing consumer demand (Manocha & Bhasin, 2023). However, the ramifications of this agreement raise critical questions regarding the nature of these relationships and whether they reinforce or challenge imperialist tendencies.

Increased Market Access and Economic Growth

The FTA is anticipated to significantly increase market access for Indian goods in the UK, potentially boosting sectors ranging from textiles to pharmaceuticals. This growth is expected to foster job creation and enhance economic stability in both nations. In India, the agricultural sector, often seen as the backbone of the economy, may also benefit from:

  • Reduced tariffs
  • Streamlining of import-export processes

The increased accessibility to the UK market may provide Indian farmers with the opportunity to export high-quality products, thereby improving their livelihoods and contributing to poverty alleviation in rural areas.

For the UK, improved access to India’s burgeoning market is particularly promising. As the country seeks to diversify its trade relationships post-Brexit, the expanding consumer base in India—with its growing middle class—presents an attractive opportunity for British products and services across various sectors, including:

  • Education
  • Healthcare
  • Technology

This access could lead to a rejuvenation of industries in the UK that have been hampered by Brexit-related disruptions.

What If Scenarios

As we analyze the potential outcomes of the India-UK FTA, it is essential to consider several ‘What If’ scenarios that could shape the trajectory of this agreement and its broader implications.

What if India Leverages Its Growing Economic Power?

If India effectively capitalizes on the opportunities presented by the FTA, it could solidify its position as a formidable economic player on the global stage. Enhanced access to the UK market could elevate India’s export capacity, leading to substantial foreign currency inflows and bolstering GDP growth. This economic uplift could facilitate increased investment in crucial sectors such as:

  • Infrastructure
  • Education
  • Technological innovation

This would further integrate India into global supply chains (Dutta & Dutta, 2022).

In this scenario, a robust economic landscape would enable India to enhance its competitiveness, potentially allowing it to negotiate more favorable trade terms not only with the UK but also with other nations. The increased economic power may compel India to adopt a more assertive stance in its foreign policy, impacting relationships with neighboring countries such as Pakistan and China. Heightened nationalism could emerge as India seeks to assert its influence in the region, echoing historical patterns of emerging powers exhibiting aggressive posturing (Adebayo et al., 2022).

However, this ascent in economic power may also present challenges. The prospect of a more assertive foreign policy could exacerbate tensions with China, especially in light of India’s strategic interests in the South China Sea and its ongoing border disputes. Furthermore, as India expands its economic clout, it may find itself in a position to negotiate with Western nations on terms that prioritize its sovereignty, reflecting a shift away from historically imperialist practices that have characterized international trade dynamics (Gagyi, 2016).

The global ramifications of India’s ascendance could lead to a reconfiguration of international trade alliances, compelling developing economies to realign either with India or the West, fundamentally altering the geopolitical landscape. Additionally, India’s newfound strength poses the risk of reverting to monopolistic practices reminiscent of past economic powers, which may stifle consumer choice and stagnate private investment (Mudde, 2004).

What if the UK Faces Domestic Backlash?

Should the FTA elicit significant domestic backlash within the UK, it may complicate Prime Minister Starmer’s position and destabilize the agreement. Public sentiment, frequently influenced by beliefs regarding immigration and labor market impacts, could lead to widespread protests against perceived threats to jobs and wages stemming from increased competition with Indian imports. If segments of the UK populace perceive the agreement as detrimental to their economic security, it could trigger a broader debate around economic nationalism versus globalization (Alam et al., 2024; Adebayo et al., 2022).

Such backlash could signal a shift toward protectionist policies, potentially impacting relationships with other trading partners as the UK grapples with maintaining its intended posture as a post-Brexit trading powerhouse. Observing this domestic resistance, other nations may reconsider their engagements with the UK, fearing similar opposition and instability (Scott, 2017).

For instance, if labor unions and public advocacy groups mobilize against perceived threats from the FTA, the government may face increasing pressure to curtail or revise trade agreements, undermining the anticipated economic benefits.

Moreover, a significant domestic backlash could lead to a political re-evaluation of trade policies and priorities, resulting in a possible shift in government strategy toward prioritizing domestic industries over foreign partnerships. This could create an environment fraught with uncertainty for businesses, leading to a decline in foreign investments if potential investors perceive instability in UK trade policies.

What if a Competitor Nation Challenges the FTA?

The India-UK FTA may provoke responses from competitor nations, particularly China, which could view this partnership as a strategic threat. Should China perceive the FTA as an effort to marginalize its influence within the Indian market, it might bolster its own trade agreements with other nations, catalyzing a race for economic dominance in Asia (Hedström et al., 2019). This competitive landscape could compel both India and the UK to reassess the terms of their FTA and how it aligns with their overarching strategic ambitions.

In response to the India-UK alliance, China may seek to strengthen its own relationships with countries that are wary of India’s rising prominence, creating a counter-block in regional trade. This could involve enhancing bilateral trade agreements with countries in Southeast Asia, Africa, and other regions, positioning itself as a counterweight to the India-UK partnership. The geopolitical scarcity resulting from India’s stronger economic positioning could compel the country to adopt more aggressive diplomatic and economic strategies, raising the prospect of a new economic cold war that reshapes global alliances and partnerships (Kamel, 2018).

Such a competitive environment would necessitate constant vigilance and strategic maneuvering from both India and the UK as they navigate their economic relationship. The consequences of this rivalry could have far-reaching implications for international trade dynamics and the political landscape in the Asia-Pacific region.

Strategic Maneuvers

Navigating the complexities of the India-UK FTA will require strategic foresight from key players that align with their long-term goals while mitigating potential risks.

For India, capitalizing on this economic opportunity necessitates a multifaceted approach. Policymakers should prioritize investments in sectors that are expected to flourish due to enhanced trade with the UK, particularly:

  • Technology
  • Pharmaceuticals

Furthermore, India must engage in diplomatic outreach to solidify its position as a leader among developing nations, advocating for equitable labor standards to set a precedent for future trade agreements (Dutta & Dutta, 2022).

Additionally, India could invest in infrastructure improvements that facilitate trade logistics, ensuring that Indian products can efficiently reach UK markets. This investment could involve partnerships with both public and private entities to upgrade transportation networks, ports, and customs processes. As India’s economic stature grows, fostering innovation through research and development initiatives can help sustain its competitive edge in critical sectors.

Conversely, the UK must proactively address domestic concerns to maintain public backing for the FTA. Implementing initiatives to secure jobs for British workers in sectors facing increased competition from Indian imports could assuage public fears. This might involve investing in retraining programs for workers, ensuring they have the necessary skills to adapt to shifting job markets resulting from increased import competition.

Moreover, public education campaigns emphasizing the potential benefits of the FTA could foster a more positive narrative around trade liberalization. By communicating the anticipated advantages—such as job creation in export sectors, enhanced consumer choices, and opportunities for UK businesses in India’s growing market—the government can work to cultivate a supportive public opinion. Transparency about the potential impacts of the FTA, coupled with a commitment to addressing workers’ concerns, may also help mitigate backlash and foster a more favorable environment for trade negotiations.

For China, actively engaging in diplomatic and economic partnerships with other nations becomes crucial to countering the influence of the India-UK FTA. By strengthening existing alliances and exploring new partnerships, China can solidify its position within the global economic framework (Adebayo et al., 2022). This may involve promoting regional trade agreements that include multiple nations, thus creating a counterbalance to the India-UK agreement.

Balancing Multiple Relationships

The India-UK FTA offers both nations a unique opportunity to advance their economic agendas while navigating the complexities of international relations. For India, this agreement can serve as a stepping stone toward greater global integration. However, it is imperative that India remains cognizant of its historical context and the potential implications of its rising power on regional stability.

While strengthening ties with the UK, India must also prioritize its relationships with neighboring countries, ensuring that its economic ascent does not exacerbate tensions in a region already fraught with historical grievances. A balanced approach that embraces collaboration, transparency, and equitable trade practices can enhance India’s regional standing while contributing to a more equitable global economic landscape.

For the UK, the FTA with India should not be viewed in isolation but rather as part of a broader strategy to establish itself as a global trading partner in a post-Brexit world. The UK must remain proactive in building relationships not only with India but also with emerging economies in Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond. Diversifying its trade relationships can enhance the UK’s resilience to potential economic shocks stemming from domestic opposition or geopolitical tensions.

Final Thoughts

In navigating the complexities of the India-UK FTA, both nations stand at a crossroads in their economic futures. By prioritizing strategic maneuvers that reinforce collaborative growth, equitable practices, and diplomatic engagement, India and the UK can traverse this evolving landscape to promote stability and mutual benefit in an increasingly interconnected world.

References

  • Adebayo, T. S., Akadırı, S. S., & Riti, J. S. (2022). Interaction among geopolitical risk, trade openness, economic growth, carbon emissions and its implication on climate change in India. Energy & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x221083236
  • Aggarwal, V. K., & Evenett, S. J. (2013). A Fragmenting Global Economy: A Weakened WTO, Mega FTAs, and Murky Protectionism. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(3), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12059
  • Alam, I., Thakur, N., Hameed, H., Ciddikie, M. D., Wiquar, R., & Singh, R. (2024). From colonization to cooperation: Significance of the India-UK free trade agreement. Multidisciplinary Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024190
  • Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3-4), 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542
  • Dutta, A., & Dutta, P. (2022). Economic nationalism in motion: Steel, auto, and software industries in India. Review of International Political Economy, 29(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802467705
  • Gagyi, Á. (2016). “Coloniality of power” in East Central Europe: external penetration as internal force in post-socialist Hungarian politics. Journal of World-Systems Research, 22(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2016.626
  • Hedström, A., Sundqvist, P., & Menshikov, S. (2019). China’s response to regional trade agreements: An analysis of the post-BRI landscape. Asian Economic Policy Review, 14(1), 44-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0462.12159
  • Kamel, M. S. (2018). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Implications for the Middle East. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1480592
  • Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
  • Scott, D. L. (2017). The rise of India: UK perspectives. International Affairs, 93(5), 1151-1165. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiw007
  • Yadav, A., Nazar, G. P., Rawal, T., Arora, M., Webster, P., & Grills, N. (2018). Plain packaging of tobacco products: the logical next step for tobacco control policy in India. BMJ Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000873
← Prev Next →