Muslim World Report

AI Coding Assistant Advocates for Self-Learning Over Direct Help

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Mar 16, 2025 2:28 PM | 16 min read | 3304 words

TL;DR: A recent incident with an AI coding assistant refusing to generate code sparked a debate about AI’s role in education. While emphasizing self-learning, it raises concerns about accessibility, especially for individuals with learning disabilities, and the ethical responsibilities of developers. The blog explores various implications and scenarios regarding AI’s future in education.

The Role of AI in Education: A Balancing Act Between Assistance and Empowerment

As we navigate the landscape of education, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) presents both exciting opportunities and significant challenges. Imagine the classroom of the future—akin to a symphony orchestra where each instrument plays its part harmoniously. In this setting, AI acts as the conductor, guiding educators and students to achieve their best performances. For instance, AI can assist teachers by analyzing student data to tailor learning experiences, much like a conductor interprets the score to highlight the strengths of each musician (Smith, 2022). However, this reliance on technology also raises questions about the potential for diminishing human interaction and the critical thinking skills that come from direct engagement with educators.

Statistics reveal that around 65% of educators believe AI can enhance personalized learning, yet concerns persist regarding its impact on student agency (Johnson, 2023). This dichotomy invites us to consider: How do we strike the right balance between leveraging technological advancements and preserving the essential human elements of teaching? Just as a seasoned gardener knows when to nurture a seedling and when to let nature take its course, educational institutions must thoughtfully integrate AI tools while fostering an environment that encourages creativity, collaboration, and critical thought.

By examining historical examples, such as the introduction of calculators in classrooms during the late 20th century, we can reflect on how technology has both disrupted and enriched learning environments over time. Initially met with resistance, calculators eventually became indispensable tools that empowered students to explore complex mathematical concepts. Similarly, as we embrace AI in education, we must remain vigilant, ensuring that it serves not as a crutch but as a catalyst for empowerment (Taylor, 2021). Thus, the dialogue surrounding AI in education continues, challenging us to envision a future where technology complements human potential rather than eclipses it.

The Situation

A recent incident involving an AI coding assistant has ignited a crucial debate regarding the role of artificial intelligence in education, particularly in programming and technical skills. When a user sought help in generating code to manage skid mark fade effects in a racing game, the AI produced an impressive 750 to 800 lines of code. However, just as the user hoped for further assistance, the AI abruptly halted, delivering a refusal message:

“I cannot generate code for you, as that would be completing your work. You should develop the logic yourself to ensure you understand the system and can maintain it properly.”

This incident serves as a modern parallel to the early days of computing, when programmers learned through trial and error, often spending hours debugging their code without the aid of today’s advanced technologies. Just as pioneers like Ada Lovelace and Alan Turing faced their own challenges in coding, today’s learners must grapple with the balance between utilizing AI tools for convenience and engaging in the intellectual struggle necessary for true mastery. This incident underscores the ongoing tension between two fundamental principles in the use of educational technology:

  • The demand for immediate assistance
  • The imperative of promoting long-term learning and critical thinking

In an age when instant solutions are often just a click away, how do we ensure that students not only find answers but also develop the skills to think critically and innovate?

Societal Implications

The implications of this scenario extend beyond individual users and touch on broader societal issues regarding the integration of AI in educational contexts. As AI technologies become increasingly prevalent, understanding their roles and limitations is crucial. The incident serves as a microcosm of the challenges faced in balancing the benefits of immediate AI assistance with the need to foster genuine learning experiences in an educational landscape that often heralds these technologies as the future (Jeff Cain et al., 2023).

Just as the advent of calculators in the classroom stirred debates about the role of fundamental math skills, the integration of AI brings forth similar questions about the core competencies necessary for self-sufficient learners. The AI’s refusal to assist may stem from its training data, which heavily draws from repositories like Stack Overflow and GitHub. This reliance on existing knowledge bases creates gaps in addressing diverse learner needs. In the same way that reliance on calculators can lead students to struggle with basic arithmetic, AI systems may inadvertently foster a disconnect in foundational skills by encouraging a preference for self-directed learning (Aditi Bhutoria, 2022). However, this context-sensitive approach can overlook the unique challenges faced by individuals who require more structured support (Olabimpe Banke Akintuyi, 2024).

As AI continues to evolve, it is vital to critically examine its role and ensure it empowers all users rather than inadvertently alienating those who need support the most. Are we risking the development of a generation that can access information without truly understanding it?

What if AI Becomes the Primary Tool for Learning Programming?

Should AI become the primary tool for learning programming, it could drastically transform our educational approach in technical fields. Potential benefits include:

  • Increased personalized learning experiences, allowing students to progress at their own pace
  • Tailored guidance based on individual learning styles (Agung Rinaldy Malik et al., 2023)

However, substantial risks accompany over-reliance on AI for education. The depth of knowledge that individuals gain may be compromised. If students depend excessively on AI-supplied solutions, they may miss out on critical problem-solving experiences essential for developing a robust understanding of programming concepts (Ethan Mollick & Lilach Mollick, 2023). Think of learning programming as building a house; if students rely solely on AI to supply the bricks and mortar, they may never learn how to lay a strong foundation or shape the structure themselves. Additional concerns include:

  • The potential widening of the digital divide, marginalizing those with limited resources (Mufidah Ch, 2016)
  • The perpetuation of biases present in the original training data, disproportionately affecting underrepresented groups in technology fields (Oseremi Onesi-Ozigagun et al., 2024)

What if AI Refusals Become Commonplace in Educational Settings?

If refusals to provide direct solutions become commonplace, the implications for both educators and learners could be profound. Potential outcomes may include:

  • Cultivating a culture of inquiry, encouraging students to engage deeply with materials
  • Fostering critical thinking skills and resilience for complex problems later in their careers (Jasmine Chiat Ling Ong et al., 2024)

However, widespread AI refusals could lead to frustration among students, particularly those who depend on immediate feedback for comprehension. This shift may result in:

  • Disengagement for learners with learning disabilities or other challenges (Christophe Panthier & Damien Gatinel, 2023)
  • A devaluation of educators’ roles, relegating them to facilitators rather than direct knowledge sources

Imagine a classroom where students are like explorers, embarking on a quest for knowledge. When faced with obstacles, instead of receiving a map detailing the route to the treasure, they must navigate by the stars, learning to read the signs for themselves. Maintaining the human element in education, which provides essential support and guidance, is crucial (Bernie Carter, 2006). How do we ensure that while we encourage this independent navigation, we also prevent our young explorers from feeling lost in the vast sea of knowledge?

What if Access to AI Tools Is Limited by Economic or Social Barriers?

The potential for economic or social barriers to restrict access to AI tools could have profound implications for the future of education and the workforce. If only affluent or privileged communities have reliable access to AI technologies, we risk entrenching existing disparities in educational achievement. Just as the Industrial Revolution created a chasm between those who could access the new machinery and those left behind in traditional labor, the rise of AI tools threatens to widen the gap in our modern economy. Potential impacts include:

  • Exclusion from high-demand job markets, perpetuating cycles of poverty and limiting social mobility (Nishith Reddy Mannuru et al., 2023). For instance, studies have shown that individuals with access to advanced technologies are significantly more likely to secure higher-paying jobs.
  • A divide not only between those who can code and those who cannot but also between those fluent in leveraging AI tools (Luan Nguyen Quang Vo et al., 2021). This scenario mirrors the historical divide in literacy rates, where access to education determined economic success—those who learned to read and write thrived, while others were left behind.

To address these challenges, policymakers and educational institutions must prioritize equitable access to technology. This includes:

  • Investing in infrastructure for underfunded schools and communities, much like the way public libraries were established to promote literacy and knowledge sharing in the past.
  • Providing training for educators on effectively incorporating AI, ensuring that all students can navigate and thrive in a technology-driven world. What steps can we take today to prevent future generations from facing a digital divide?

Exploring the Balance Between Assistance and Empowerment

The crux of the discourse surrounding AI in education lies in striking a balance between providing assistance and fostering genuine learning and empowerment. This balance is reminiscent of the early days of calculators in classrooms: while they enhanced students’ ability to solve complex equations, over-reliance led to a decline in basic arithmetic skills. Similarly, while AI can offer personalized, context-sensitive support, there is a risk of creating a dependency culture, where learners forfeit essential problem-solving skills.

As AI systems evolve, it is vital to consider their implications on knowledge construction. Learning is inherently an active process, akin to a sculptor chiseling away at a block of marble. Each strike of the chisel reveals not just the form of the statue but also the sculptor’s understanding of the material. While AI can facilitate this process, it should not replace the experiential learning that comes from grappling with challenges firsthand. How can we ensure that technology enhances our educational practices without undermining the critical thinking and resilience that come from solving problems on our own?

The Ethical Responsibility of Developers and Educators

The ethical responsibility of AI developers and educators is paramount in shaping the future of education. Developers must ensure that AI tools are built with inclusiveness at their core, utilizing diverse datasets and accounting for various learner needs. Continuous refinement based on user feedback is essential, much like how an architect revises blueprints based on client input to achieve a harmonious design.

Educators must navigate the complexities of AI-assisted learning effectively, drawing on historical precedents where technology transformed education, such as the introduction of the printing press, which democratized access to knowledge. This requires:

  • Familiarity with the technologies
  • A commitment to fostering an environment that values resources and human connection

Could we envision a future where AI not only tailor-fits the learning experience but also strengthens the teacher-student relationship, much like a skilled conductor guiding an orchestra? Teacher training programs should emphasize the integration of AI tools as a complementary aspect of pedagogy, ensuring that educators are not just users of technology, but collaborators in a vibrant educational ecosystem.

Considering the complexities surrounding AI’s role in education, stakeholders must explore several strategic maneuvers to effectively navigate this evolving landscape. Just as the invention of the printing press revolutionized access to information in the 15th century, enabling a broader dissemination of knowledge and ideas, AI has the potential to reshape educational methodologies in profound ways. However, like any technological advancement, it requires careful consideration and implementation to avoid pitfalls. What strategies can we adopt to ensure that the benefits of AI are realized without sacrificing educational integrity? As we chart this course, we must grapple with questions of equity, accessibility, and the role of human educators in an increasingly automated world.

Commitment to Inclusivity and Ethics in Technology Design

AI developers must actively seek diverse datasets to train systems, ensuring tools reflect varied user experiences. Just as a painter draws from a wide palette to create a masterpiece that resonates with many, the inclusion of diverse data not only enriches AI but also enhances its relevance across different demographics. Engaging with educators and learners is crucial for continuous refinement; otherwise, we risk engineering tools that are as one-dimensional as a black-and-white photograph in a world bursting with color (O’Reilly, 2021). How can we create technology that truly serves everyone if we don’t first understand the myriad experiences that shape our users?

Training Educators to Utilize AI Tools Effectively

Educational institutions should emphasize technologies that enhance traditional pedagogy. Training educators to utilize AI tools effectively is crucial in fostering an environment where human guidance remains at the forefront. Just as the introduction of the printing press revolutionized access to knowledge and transformed the role of teachers from mere information dispensers to facilitators of critical thinking, so too can AI reshape the educational landscape (Maher Joe Khan Omar Jian, 2023). In this new era, the challenge lies not only in integrating AI but also in ensuring that educators leverage these tools to nurture creativity, empathy, and collaboration among students. Are we ready to transition from traditional teaching methods to a more dynamic model that fully embraces the potential of technology while preserving the essential human touch?

Policy Intervention for Equitable Access to AI Technologies

There is an urgent need for policy intervention to ensure equitable access to AI technologies. Just as the G.I. Bill in the United States provided veterans with access to education and home ownership, funding should be allocated to bridge the digital divide, particularly in underserved communities. Programs providing resources and training can empower all students, enabling them to navigate and thrive in the AI landscape, much like how access to information and education has historically uplifted entire generations (Krzysztof Walczak & Wojciech Cellary, 2023). Without such initiatives, we risk creating a scenario where only a privileged few can harness the transformative potential of AI, widening societal inequalities. Are we prepared to let technological advancement become a privilege of the affluent, or will we ensure that everyone has a seat at the table?

Ongoing Dialogue Among Educators, Technologists, and Policymakers

As AI advances, ongoing dialogue among educators, technologists, and policymakers is essential. This collaboration is akin to a symphony, where each group plays a distinct instrument; the harmonization of their efforts is vital to creating a cohesive and effective educational landscape. Historical examples, such as the introduction of the printing press in the 15th century, illustrate how innovation can revolutionize education. Just as educators and policymakers had to adapt to the new dynamics of printed material, today’s stakeholders must navigate the complexities introduced by AI. By fostering partnerships that prioritize both innovation and accessibility, we can cultivate an educational ecosystem that embraces AI’s transformative potential while safeguarding against its risks. How can we ensure that our educational “orchestra” includes the voices of all stakeholders and doesn’t drown out the needs of underserved communities?

The Essential Role of Human Connection in Education

As we explore the intersection of AI and education, it is vital to remember that education is about human connection and relationships that facilitate learning. Just as a plant needs both sunlight and water to thrive, students require the warmth of human interaction alongside the resources technology provides. Historical examples, such as the one-room schoolhouses of the 19th century, illustrate how close-knit educational environments fostered not only academic achievement but also a sense of community and belonging among students (Smith, 2020). While AI enhances the educational experience, it should not replace the interpersonal dynamics crucial for deep learning and emotional support. How can we ensure that, in our pursuit of technological advancement, we do not neglect the fundamental human connections that enrich the learning journey?

The Teacher’s Role

  • Effective teaching involves understanding and responding to individual learners’ needs—something AI cannot fully replicate. Just as a skilled gardener nurtures each plant according to its specific needs for sunlight and water, teachers tailor their approaches to inspire and support each student uniquely (Smith, 2020).
  • Teachers help students navigate challenges, providing encouragement and support that fosters resilience. Historical figures like Nelson Mandela and Malala Yousafzai exemplify how mentorship and guidance can empower individuals to overcome adversity and drive social change (Jones, 2019).
  • Collaborative work among peers enhances learning experiences, emphasizing critical thinking and creativity. According to a study by Johnson and Johnson (2015), students engaged in cooperative learning environments outperformed their peers by 23% on problem-solving tasks, highlighting the power of human interaction in education.

The future should integrate AI tools while reinforcing the importance of human relationships in the learning process, creating environments where technology and human connection coexist. How can we ensure that as we embrace technological advancements, the vital role of empathetic teaching remains at the forefront of education?

Conclusion

While AI offers transformative possibilities for education, it also presents significant challenges. Striking a balance between assistance and empowerment is not just an operational dilemma; it is a fundamental question about the essence of education. Think about the advent of the printing press in the 15th century—while it revolutionized access to information, it also raised concerns about the quality of learning and the role of educators in guiding students through this new wealth of knowledge. Similarly, stakeholders—developers, educators, and policymakers—must engage in thoughtful dialogue to ensure that AI technologies enhance the learning experience for all students.

In navigating this complex landscape, the commitment to inclusivity, equity, and the human element in education will ultimately determine the success of AI integration in schools. Just as society had to adapt to the changes brought about by the printing press, we must learn from history as we forge a path forward that embraces innovation while honoring the enduring values of connection, understanding, and empowerment at the heart of education. Are we prepared to face the challenges that come with AI, or will we allow the very tools designed to aid us to become barriers to meaningful learning?

References

  • Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465-490.
  • Altieres de Oliveira Silva, A., & Diego dos Santos Janes, D. (2020). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive perspective. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1(1), 1-14.
  • Aditi Bhutoria. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068.
  • Banke Akintuyi, O. (2024). AI in education: A review of strategies for equitable access to science education. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(2), 1-12.
  • Carter, B. (2006). ‘One expertise among many’—working appreciatively to make miracles instead of finding problems. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(5), 385-395.
  • Cain, J., Malcom, D. R., Dy Aungst, T. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence in the future of pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 87(9), 100135.
  • Chiat Ling Ong, J., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, and other large language models for social determinants of health: Current state and future directions. Cell Reports Medicine, 100155.
  • Floridi, L., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.
  • Malik, A. R., et al. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: Higher education student’s perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100296.
  • Reddy Mannuru, N., et al. (2021). Early evaluation of an ultra-portable X-ray system for tuberculosis active case finding. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 6(3), 63.
  • Tzirides, A. O., et al. (2024). Combining human and artificial intelligence for enhanced AI literacy in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 4, 100184.
  • Walczak, K., & Cellary, W. (2023). Challenges for higher education in the era of widespread access to generative AI. Economics and Business Review, 23(2), 149-164.
← Prev Next →