Muslim World Report

Sportswashing: How Nations Use Sports to Mask Human Rights Abuses

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 5, 2025 10:11 AM | 7 min read | 1490 words

TL;DR: Sportswashing is the practice of using international sporting events to improve the image of nations with poor human rights records. The 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar exemplifies this tactic, diverting attention from serious human rights violations. This blog explores potential scenarios regarding the future of sportswashing, urging stakeholders to prioritize ethical engagement in global sports.

The Politics of Sportswashing: A Critical Examination

The Situation

In the contemporary geopolitical landscape, the phenomenon of sportswashing—defined as the strategic deployment of sports events and organizations to enhance the reputational standing of nations with egregious human rights records—has gained alarming prominence. Authoritarian states like Saudi Arabia and Qatar have poured billions into hosting international sporting events, including:

  • Football World Cups
  • Formula One races

This is a deliberate attempt to reshape global perceptions and divert attention from their domestic challenges (Fruh, Archer, & Wojtowicz, 2022).

The 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar serves as a striking case study of this tactic. The tournament was marred by widespread scrutiny regarding:

  • The treatment of migrant workers
  • Curtailments on freedom of expression
  • Severe human rights violations in the context of the nation’s rapid modernization

Rather than addressing these pressing issues directly, the Qatari government seized the opportunity presented by the World Cup to craft a narrative of progress, modernity, and hospitality—effectively redirecting global attention away from its systemic abuses and the oppressive realities faced by many within its borders (Søyland & Moriconi, 2022).

This strategic maneuver illustrates how authoritarian regimes weaponize international sporting events to normalize their abuses, presenting themselves as progressive while obfuscating the grim realities of their governance (Black, Sinclair, & Kearns, 2024).

The implications of this trend are far-reaching. Public perception is instrumental in shaping international policy, investment decisions, and diplomatic relations. Governments facing internal criticism often turn to high-profile sporting events as a means to regain legitimacy through a temporary veneer of respectability (Boykoff, 2022). This dynamic raises crucial questions about accountability and ethical engagement in global sports, underscoring the necessity to scrutinize how entertainment and politics increasingly intertwine.

In an era of hyper-connectivity, the expansion of sportswashing reflects a deeper struggle over narratives and definitions of national identities in the 21st century. The ramifications extend well beyond the realm of sports, impacting trade, alliances, and cultural exchanges. If left unchecked, this trend risks normalizing the state’s disregard for human rights and democratic values, fundamentally threatening the moral integrity of international relations (Grix & Dinsmore, 2023).

What if Sportswashing Becomes the Norm?

If sportswashing becomes a standard strategy for authoritarian regimes, we may witness a radical shift in global perceptions of nations (Grix & James, 2024). Prestigious events like the Olympics or the World Cup could increasingly serve as platforms for obfuscating human rights violations, allowing countries with dubious records to cultivate unprecedented soft power. Such a shift could lead to a global environment where ethical considerations surrounding international sporting events are routinely ignored, fostering an atmosphere of complicity and moral vacuity (Toula & Broussard, 2024).

As more states engage in sportswashing, the ethical standards of international sporting organizations will face intense scrutiny. The dilemma arises—would bodies like FIFA or the International Olympic Committee (IOC) prioritize profit over principles of human rights? This potential normalization could breed widespread cynicism among global citizens, particularly in democracies where accountability is expected. As trust erodes, it could significantly impact cooperation on pressing global issues such as:

  • Climate change
  • Health crises
  • Humanitarian assistance (Kearns et al., 2023)

What if Major Sporting Organizations Reject Sportswashing?

Conversely, imagine a scenario where influential international sports organizations take a firm stance against sportswashing by enforcing stringent ethical criteria for host nations. Such a rejection could spark a transformative era of accountability, compelling nations to address their human rights practices transparently before being awarded major events (Grix et al., 2023).

This shift could empower civil society movements worldwide, amplifying local demands for reform and enhancing the credibility of sporting organizations in the process. However, the feasibility of this scenario depends significantly on the economic and political will of these organizations. The promise of lucrative financial returns from hosting mega-events often complicates ethical decision-making (Davis & Plumley, 2023).

What if Civil Society Mobilizes Against Sportswashing?

An alternative but potent scenario could unfold with a unified global civil society effort to combat sportswashing. Activists, nonprofits, and concerned citizens might leverage social media to heighten awareness about the consequences of hosting events in countries with poor human rights records, exerting sustained public pressure on sponsors, broadcasters, and sports organizations (Brannagan & Giulianotti, 2014).

Such activism could lead to backlash against brands associated with sportswashing, potentially resulting in boycotts and divestments. However, the success of this scenario hinges on forming broad coalitions that transcend national and ideological divides. Activists would also need to navigate the complexities of engaging with international sports organizations, which often operate with a significant degree of impunity (Mutter, 2022).

Strategic Maneuvers

In response to the challenges posed by sportswashing, various stakeholders must adopt proactive strategies:

  1. Civil Society Organizations:

    • Prioritize awareness campaigns that elucidate the interconnectedness of sports, politics, and human rights.
    • Emphasize that the narratives constructed by sportswashing states frequently mask significant underlying issues (Hyndman et al., 2023).
    • Build coalitions among NGOs, labor unions, and human rights organizations to amplify these efforts, creating pressure on sporting bodies and corporate sponsors to adopt ethical practices in host nation selections.

  2. Sporting Organizations:

    • Develop and implement stringent ethical frameworks for assessing potential host countries.
    • Prioritize human rights and social justice alongside environmental sustainability.
    • Integrate input from national and international human rights organizations into decision-making processes to ensure that ethical considerations remain central to organizational policies (Goulding et al., 2023).

  3. Governments:

    • Reevaluate diplomatic engagements with nations that employ sportswashing tactics.
    • Adopt clear, principled foreign policies that prioritize human rights and democratic values over transient economic interests.
    • Such policies would contribute to a global landscape where accountability is valued, and where nations are disincentivized from using sports as mere façades for their transgressions (Grix & Dinsmore, 2023).

As the international community grapples with the ramifications of sportswashing, various stakeholders must adopt strategic maneuvers to counteract its adverse effects. Civil society organizations should raise awareness about sportswashing and its consequences. Awareness campaigns should aim to educate the public about the nexus between sports, politics, and human rights, emphasizing that the narratives constructed by these regimes often obscure significant underlying issues.

Coalition-building among NGOs, human rights organizations, and labor unions can amplify these efforts. By organizing events, releasing joint statements, and engaging in advocacy, these groups can exert pressure on sporting organizations and sponsors to implement ethical practices in selecting host nations. Additionally, civil society must leverage digital platforms to create a counter-narrative, providing alternative accounts of host countries’ human rights records and encouraging public discourse.

For sporting organizations, developing a stringent ethical framework for assessing potential host countries is critical. Establishing criteria that prioritize human rights, social justice, and environmental sustainability will enhance the credibility of events and help restore public trust. Moreover, integrating stakeholder input—particularly from national and international human rights organizations—into decision-making processes can ensure that ethical considerations remain paramount within organizational policies.

Meanwhile, governments around the world must reevaluate their diplomatic engagements with nations that engage in sportswashing. They should adopt clear, principled foreign policies that prioritize human rights and democratic values over transient economic interests. By doing so, they can contribute to a global environment where accountability is valued, and nations are disincentivized from using sports as a mere façade for their transgressions.

References

  • Black, J., Sinclair, J., & Kearns, J. (2024). The Weaponization of Sport: Examining Authoritarian Regimes’ Tactics. International Journal of Sport and Society.
  • Brannagan, P. M., & Giulianotti, R. (2014). Sporting Mega-Events, Social Media, and the Politics of Protest: Analyzing the Case of the FIFA World Cup in Brazil. Journal of Global Sport Management.
  • Davis, C., & Plumley, D. (2023). Balancing Revenue and Responsibility: The Dilemma of Major Sporting Organizations. Sport Management Review.
  • Fruh, M., Archer, M., & Wojtowicz, A. (2022). Sportswashing in the 21st Century: An Evaluation of the Strategy’s Effectiveness. Political Studies Review.
  • Goulding, L., et al. (2023). Ethical Considerations in Global Sports: A Framework for Best Practices. Journal of Global Ethics.
  • Grix, J., & Dinsmore, T. (2023). The Role of Sport in International Relations: Bridging Divides or Creating Chasms? Sport in Society.
  • Grix, J., & James, M. (2024). The Normalization of Sportswashing: Implications for International Relations. European Journal of International Relations.
  • Hyndman, J., et al. (2023). The Politics of Sport: Human Rights and International Governance. Human Rights Quarterly.
  • Kearns, J., et al. (2023). Citizens of the World: The Impact of Sportswashing on Global Activism. International Review for the Sociology of Sport.
  • Mutter, J. (2022). Navigating Impunity: Civil Society Engagement with International Sports Organizations. Sport and Politics in Globalization.
  • Søyland, L., & Moriconi, C. (2022). Qatar 2022: Sports, Human Rights, and the Future of Global Sporting Events. Sport in Society.
  • Toula, J., & Broussard, S. (2024). Ethics Over Entertainment: The Future of Sports Governance. Journal of Business Ethics.
← Prev Next →