Muslim World Report

Modi and Yunus Discuss Bangladesh's Future After Hasina's Ouster

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 5, 2025 10:13 AM | 9 min read | 1766 words

TL;DR: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and interim Bangladeshi leader Muhammad Yunus hold pivotal discussions post Sheikh Hasina’s ousting, focusing on stability, democracy, and regional dynamics in South Asia. Their talks touch upon the implications of Bangladesh’s political upheaval, potential external interventions, and the role of civil society in fostering democratic practices and human rights.

The Situation: A New Political Landscape in Bangladesh

On Friday, April 5, 2025, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi engaged in significant dialogue with Muhammad Yunus, the interim leader of Bangladesh. This meeting occurs in the aftermath of Sheikh Hasina’s ousting—a pivotal moment marked by her flight to India amidst widespread protests led by students and civil society groups opposing her administration. Hasina’s regime, which ruled for over a decade, faced serious allegations of authoritarianism, corruption, and human rights abuses.

The protests not only underscore the deep-seated discontent within Bangladesh but also reflect a burgeoning desire among the youth for democratic governance and accountability (Hossain, 2024).

Implications of the Political Shift

The implications of this political shift are manifold:

  • Challenge to Regional Stability: The change in leadership poses a challenge to regional stability, often marred by geopolitical conflicts and historical injustices.
  • India’s Intent: Modi’s engagement with Yunus signals India’s intent to navigate this transformative period carefully, ensuring that Bangladesh remains a stable neighbor amidst rising tensions.
  • Geopolitical Rivalries: Concerns are heightened by larger powers like China, which could exacerbate domestic unrest and lead to refugee crises spilling into India (Hossain & Kumar, 2024).

Moreover, the global repercussions of Hasina’s ousting highlight the fragility of democratic institutions in emerging economies, particularly in the Global South, where legacies of imperialism linger. As nationalism and anti-imperialist rhetoric polarize the world, how Bangladesh’s situation unfolds could serve as a case study for other nations facing similar struggles (Mauro, 1995; Zafarullah & Rahman, 2008). The international community, especially Western powers with vested interests, must reconsider their approaches to governance and democracy promotion to avoid exacerbating existing divisions.

Furthermore, the meeting between Modi and Yunus indicates a noteworthy dynamic between India and Bangladesh that transcends mere border politics. The potential for economic collaboration, alongside pressing issues like climate change and social welfare, must remain at the forefront of bilateral discussions (Islam & Quazi, 2003). As these dialogues unfold, both leaders must navigate the complexities surrounding civil liberties and political representation, ensuring that the next chapter for Bangladesh does not repeat the detrimental patterns of its past.

What If Bangladesh Becomes a Center of Regional Resistance?

Should Bangladesh leverage its evolving political climate to position itself as a hub of regional resistance against imperialism and authoritarian governance, it could fundamentally alter the landscape of South Asia. Here’s how:

  • Coalition Building: Yunus could rally various civil society organizations, political entities, and youth groups.
  • Advocacy for Democratic Practices: This coalition could advocate for democratic practices, human rights, and economic justice.

Such a robust platform for advocacy could foster solidarity among neighboring countries facing similar struggles, challenging regional dominance from powers like India and China while curbing Western imperial influences (Datta, 2015).

The ramifications of such a coalition would be profound:

  • Emboldening Activists: A successful resistance movement in Bangladesh could inspire activists in Myanmar, India, and Pakistan to initiate movements for democratic reform.
  • Risks of Retaliation: However, the risks of retaliation from both international and regional forces seeking to maintain the status quo cannot be underestimated. Increased repression from neighboring governments, particularly India, may escalate tensions and prompt crackdowns on dissent (Ahamed et al., 2020).

In this context, the role of civil society organizations becomes crucial. They could serve as catalysts for change, mobilizing the population around issues of social justice, human rights, and economic equity.

Furthermore, if Bangladesh emerges as a center of regional resistance, it could lead to a broader reconfiguration of alliances within South Asia. Neighboring countries might begin to view their internal struggles through a collective lens, recognizing shared aspirations for democracy and human rights.

However, the potential backlash from established powers could manifest in the form of:

  • Increased military presence
  • Economic sanctions
  • Attempts to suppress grassroots movements deemed a threat to strategic interests.

Countries like India may perceive an empowered Bangladesh as a challenge, reacting accordingly and creating a precarious balance of power in the region.

What If External Powers Intervene in Bangladeshi Politics?

The likelihood of external powers attempting to influence the political trajectory of Bangladesh raises significant concerns regarding sovereignty and self-determination. If foreign governments—particularly Western nations or regional rivals—decide to intervene through:

  • Economic sanctions
  • Military support
  • Diplomatic pressure

The internal dynamics of Bangladesh could be drastically altered (Hossain, 2024). Such interventions may take various forms, including economic aid conditional on political reforms or military backing for the interim government.

These actions could compromise Bangladesh’s autonomy, leading to a proxy conflict where external powers exploit local divides to advance their interests, resulting in widespread instability and potentially igniting violence (Islam, 2014). While foreign intervention might temporarily bolster Yunus’s position, it could also galvanize nationalist sentiments, uniting factions against perceived foreign meddling (Hoque et al., 2018).

Furthermore, the international response calls for careful consideration. If Western nations solely support Yunus without adequately engaging civil society and local movements, they risk perpetuating a cycle of dependency. Such a dynamic could undermine grassroots initiatives and the political agency of the Bangladeshi people, potentially viewing their leaders as pawns of foreign powers rather than representatives of their aspirations.

In light of possible foreign intervention, regional dynamics would also be affected. For instance, China might interpret a strengthened U.S.-Bangladesh alliance as a direct threat, prompting it to deepen engagement with Bangladesh and complicating the geopolitical landscape.

What If Modi’s Support Leads to a Fragile Alliance?

The recent meeting between Modi and Yunus signifies a strategic maneuver by India to cultivate a fragile alliance with Bangladesh amid political upheaval. Should Modi’s administration provide substantial support to Yunus, it could yield temporary stabilization; however, such an alliance may come at considerable cost, as Yunus might feel pressured to adopt policies aligning closely with Indian interests perceived as neo-imperialist (Majumdar, 2014).

Critical Questions About Sustainability

This fragile alliance raises critical questions regarding its sustainability:

  • Domestic Backlash: Should India pressure Yunus to conform to its strategic objectives, his government could face backlash from domestic opposition, especially from groups viewing Indian influence as detrimental to national sovereignty (Ahmed & Islam, 2021).
  • Nationalist Movements: Increased public sentiment against Indian influence might prompt Yunus’s government to retreat from commitments made to Modi, destabilizing the political landscape (Hossain & Islam, 2021).

Moreover, Modi’s support could complicate Bangladesh’s relations with China, which may see a strengthened India-Bangladesh alliance as a threat, leading to deeper Chinese engagement with Bangladesh.

The implications of a fragile alliance extend beyond bilateral relations; they could significantly shape regional power structures. Should Yunus’s government appear closely aligned with India, it might provoke backlash from neighboring countries, recalibrating their foreign policies in response to perceived threats.

Strategic Maneuvers: Potential Actions for Key Players

As the political landscape in Bangladesh evolves following Sheikh Hasina’s ousting, key players—India, Bangladesh’s interim government led by Muhammad Yunus, civil society, and international actors—must consider their strategic moves to navigate this complex situation effectively.

For India

  • Maintain Stability: India’s primary goal should be to maintain stability in Bangladesh while managing its own strategic interests.
  • Economic Support: Modi’s government must prioritize diplomatic engagement by offering economic support that aligns with Yunus’s vision for a democratic Bangladesh.
  • Engagement with Civil Society: Strengthening communications with civil society organizations and independent media in Bangladesh will be crucial for fostering a democratic discourse that counters extremism.

Furthermore, India should enhance outreach to diverse political groups within Bangladesh, creating channels for dialogue and collaboration to understand the nuances of Bangladeshi politics better.

For Muhammad Yunus

As the interim leader, Yunus should focus on solidifying legitimacy among the populace:

  • Prioritize Inclusivity and Transparency: Ensure that all political voices—especially those of marginalized communities—are heard.
  • Initiate Dialogue with Opposition Groups: Explore avenues for coalition-building leading to unified governance.

Yunus should tackle corruption and demonstrate accountability to regain public trust, making a clear distinction from Hasina’s legacy. Reforms enhancing civil liberties and political participation are also essential to mitigate authoritarian risks.

For Civil Society

The role of civil society in this transitional phase is paramount:

  • Mobilize Advocacy Efforts: Organizations and activists should advocate for democratic reforms and engage youth in conversations about governance and responsibility.
  • Leverage Social Media: Utilize social media platforms to galvanize support and create a culture of civic engagement.

Building networks connecting with regional allies will help civil society counter external influences while amplifying calls for human rights and social justice.

For the International Community

For the international community, particularly Western powers, recalibrating engagement strategies is essential:

  • Support Homegrown Movements: Avoid imposing conditionalities that echo colonial attitudes and support local initiatives aimed at strengthening institutions rather than individuals.
  • Empower Local Governance: Prioritize engagement strategies that respect Bangladesh’s sovereignty while encouraging dialogue and development.

This reorientation could foster a resilient civil society capable of resisting external pressures and internal authoritarian tendencies.

In summary, the evolving political landscape in Bangladesh necessitates strategic maneuvers that recognize the complexities of local dynamics, regional geopolitics, and the historical context of imperial influence. By prioritizing genuine support for democratic practices, accountability, and social justice, all players can contribute to a more stable and equitable future for Bangladesh and the region at large.

References

Ahamed, A., Rahman, M. S., & Hossain, M. S. (2020). China-Bangladesh relations in the context of the geopolitical, security, strategic and economic interests of India. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(8), 62-75.

Ahmed, S., & Islam, M. S. (2021). Understanding Bangladesh’s relations with India and China: Dilemmas and responses. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 17(1), 125-144.

Datta, P. (2015). Push-pull factors of undocumented migration from Bangladesh to West Bengal: A perception study. The Qualitative Report, 20(11), 1743-1762.

Hossain, M. I., & Kumar, J. (2024). Antecedents of sustainable tourism development in Sundarbans, Bangladesh with the moderation of political instability and mediation of destination resilience. Tourism Planning & Development, 10(2), 201-219.

Hossain, M. S., & Islam, M. S. (2021). The implications of the Bangladesh political landscape for regional stability. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 124-138.

Islam, A. (2014). Health system in Bangladesh: Challenges and opportunities. American Journal of Health Research, 2(6), 166-171.

Majumdar, A. J. (2014). Making sense of India–Bangladesh relations. India Quarterly, 70(4), 391-403.

Mauro, P. (1995). Correspondence on the political economy of corruption. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(3), 116-118.

Zafarullah, H., & Rahman, R. (2008). The impaired state: Assessing state capacity and governance in Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(5), 545-561.

← Prev Next →