Muslim World Report

Student Protests Surge in Serbia Amid Calls for Accountability

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Mar 24, 2025 11:07 AM | 9 min read | 1797 words

TL;DR: Serbia is experiencing a surge in student-led protests fueled by widespread frustration over government corruption and safety failures. This movement represents a significant shift in civic engagement, as students reclaim their political agency and challenge long-standing governmental negligence. While the potential for transformative change exists, the movement also faces economic and political challenges that could impact its future.

The Serbian Student Protests: A Movement at a Crossroads

In the past few months leading up to March 2025, Serbia has witnessed an unprecedented surge in student-led protests, a striking manifestation of public dissent fueled by widespread frustrations concerning governmental corruption, negligence, and systemic failures. These demonstrations gained momentum following a tragic incident in Novi Sad, where a railway canopy collapse resulted in the heartbreaking loss of 16 lives. This catastrophe, reminiscent of the collapses that have sparked outrage in other nations—like the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster in Bangladesh, which claimed over 1,100 lives—has become a rallying point for a disillusioned populace, reflecting a deeper, pervasive dissatisfaction with President Aleksandar Vučić’s administration, which has been characterized by critics as kleptocratic (Lesthaeghe, 2010; Fuentes, 2014). The protests challenge the government’s immediate response to the canopy collapse and its long-standing disregard for the safety and welfare of its citizens. Like a boiling kettle reaching its limit, these protests signify that the frustrations of the people can no longer be contained and are demanding urgent attention and accountability.

A Shift in Civic Engagement

Historically, young people in Serbia have been marginalized in political discourse, often sidelined by a prevailing culture of apathy that stifles collective action (Nika, 2018; Kuntz & Thompson, 2009). However, these protests signify a transformative shift, as students reclaim their political agency by utilizing mechanisms such as “people’s plenums”—grassroots democratic assemblies designed to promote civic engagement and public participation. This change is particularly noteworthy in a society where political apathy has long stymied meaningful collective action.

The protests symbolize a critical moment in Serbia’s political landscape, where aspirations for democratic representation and accountability intersect with a cultural context often characterized by electoral authoritarianism (Tucker, 2007; Kuperman, 2008). This resurgence of civic engagement echoes historical moments like the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia, where collective action united citizens against entrenched power structures, demonstrating how grassroots movements can shift the political tide. The rise of these movements highlights the aspirations and grievances of young citizens and resonates with global calls for participatory governance as a counter to bureaucratic neglect.

However, the road ahead is fraught with complications, including:

  • Economic insecurity: High unemployment and rising inflation create an uneasy atmosphere.
  • Fear of reprisals: Potential protesters worry about jeopardizing their livelihoods (Mihaljinac & Mevorah, 2019).
  • Collective action challenges: When citizens perceive the costs of participation to outweigh potential benefits, their willingness to act diminishes, reflecting the well-documented collective action problem (Tucker, 2007; Kuntz & Thompson, 2009). Could the bravery of a few ignite the resolve of many, or will the specter of past failures continue to haunt their efforts?

What If the Protests Intensify?

As the situation unfolds, one immediate question arises: what if the protests intensify? The potential for significant political consequences increases if the current momentum is sustained or escalated. A prolonged confrontation between protesters and the government could lead to heightened tensions, provoking a more aggressive response from state security forces. Historically, such crackdowns on dissent have often culminated in violence, further compromising civil liberties (Darden & Grzymała-Busse, 2006). For instance, the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 serve as a stark reminder of how state aggression can exacerbate social unrest, resulting in profound human rights violations and a long-lasting impact on civic freedoms.

However, if student leaders can sustain momentum and articulate a coherent platform that resonates across broader societal segments—including workers and marginalized communities—this could catalyze a nationwide dialogue on governance and systemic corruption (Larreguy & Marshall, 2016). Such a dialogue would not only reshape the narrative around civic engagement in Serbia but could also draw parallels to the Solidarity movement in Poland, which united various societal groups against an oppressive regime, ultimately leading to significant political change. This collective action compelled the Vučić administration to either engage in meaningful reform or risk losing its legitimacy altogether (Ackerman & DuVall, 2005).

As protests intensify, the international community’s scrutiny would likely increase. Heightened attention from global human rights organizations and foreign governments may exert pressure on the Serbian administration, compelling it to reconsider its approach to governance (Nika, 2018; Fuentes, 2014). Could we see a scenario where sympathy for these protests not only grows across borders but also transforms into tangible support? If citizens in neighboring countries draw parallels between their struggles against corrupt and negligent governments, the interconnectedness fostered by digital platforms could catalyze localized protests into a global movement advocating for accountability and reform (Polese, 2009; Banaji, 2008). This global wave of solidarity could empower marginalized voices worldwide, reminding us that the fight for justice knows no borders.

What If the Movement Loses Momentum?

Conversely, the ramifications of a fading protest movement could be dire. What if the student-led protests were to lose momentum? A failure to maintain energy and engagement might dishearten many young activists, fostering a culture of apathy that the Vučić administration could exploit to reinforce its control (Skocpol & Fiorina, 2000). This stagnation would allow systemic corruption to persist unchecked, as citizens retreat into individualism—a retreat that could deepen a culture of fear and silence dissent (Putnam, 1995; Nika, 2018).

To illustrate, consider the civil rights movement in the United States during the late 1960s. As public interest waned and protests decreased, many activists faced disenchantment and a retreat from collective action. This decline not only allowed systemic racism and inequality to persist but also set back progress for generations (Cohen, 2009). In a broader regional context, a faltering movement in Serbia could embolden autocratic regimes in the Balkans, framing the Serbian protests as a failed example of grassroots activism. Such narratives could discourage other movements, reinforcing cycles of incompetence and neglect among government institutions (Larreguy & Marshall, 2016; Fuentes, 2014). If left unchecked, this stagnation could set the stage for future crises, erupting unpredictably in societies unprepared for renewed social upheaval. Would we be ready to respond when the next wave of unrest finally surfaces, or would we find ourselves paralyzed by the very apathy we allowed to take root?

Strategic Maneuvers for All Stakeholders

The Serbian student protests epitomize a critical juncture in the nation’s political landscape, reminiscent of historical movements like the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, where young activists stood for democratic ideals against a repressive regime. The actions of various stakeholders—students, the government, and international observers—will significantly influence the trajectory of civic engagement and accountability. For student leaders and their allies, the immediate focus must include:

  • Sustaining and broadening participation: Foster inclusive spaces for dialogue, much like the sit-ins during the Civil Rights Movement that brought diverse voices together in pursuit of justice.
  • Building coalitions: Collaborate with labor unions and civil society organizations, akin to how various groups united in the Solidarity movement in Poland to challenge authoritarian rule.
  • Engaging disenfranchised communities: Amplify demands for accountability (Skocpol & Fiorina, 2000; Darden & Grzymała-Busse, 2006).

Effective engagement with the media is also vital. Students should convey their narratives and demands clearly, countering portrayals that might depict them solely as disruptors. Utilizing social media platforms to highlight the broader implications of governmental negligence and the critical need for accountable governance can help expand their reach and impact, much like how the Arab Spring utilized digital communication to mobilize support and foster international awareness.

For the Vučić administration, the strategic choice lies in whether to open channels for reform or escalate its repression of dissent. Engaging in dialogue could mitigate tensions and restore trust, leading to a more stable governance model (Kuperman, 2008). Alternatively, an escalatory approach may galvanize greater public support for the protests, raising the question: will the government risk alienating an already discontented citizenry by suppressing their voices, or will it engage with these calls for change?

International actors also hold significant influence in this dynamic. Increased pressure from abroad—whether through diplomatic means or sanctions—may incentivize the Serbian government to contemplate reforms. However, these actions must be judiciously calibrated to avoid perceptions of imperialistic interference, which could further alienate the populace (Larreguy & Marshall, 2016; Kuntz & Thompson, 2009). In this age of global interconnectedness, how can the international community support positive change without overstepping its bounds and provoking backlash?

Conclusion

In conclusion, the path ahead for Serbia is fraught with complexities akin to navigating a dense forest where every step can lead to unforeseen consequences. Just as the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 set the stage for tumultuous changes in Europe, Serbia’s current crossroads demands that stakeholders navigate this landscape with strategic foresight. Historical precedents teach us that in times of uncertainty, the interconnectedness of fates becomes painfully evident; similarly, Serbia’s stakeholders must recognize that they are inextricably linked in a struggle demanding accountability, engagement, and—most importantly—an unwavering commitment to democratic principles. This moment represents not only a profound challenge but also a unique opportunity for transformative change. Will Serbia rise to embrace this chance, or will it repeat the mistakes of the past, remaining stagnant in a cycle of disillusionment?

References

  • Ackerman, P., & DuVall, J. (2005). People Power Primed: Civilian Resistance and Democratization. Harvard International Review.
  • Banaji, S. (2008). The trouble with civic: a snapshot of young people’s civic and political engagements in twenty-first-century democracies. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(3), 265-280.
  • Darden, K. A., & Grzymała-Busse, A. (2006). The Great Divide: Literacy, Nationalism, and the Communist Collapse. World Politics, 58(1), 1-30.
  • Fuentes, M. (2014). Performance Constellations: Memory and Event in Digitally Enabled Protests in the Americas. Text and Performance Quarterly, 34(1), 1-20.
  • Guriev, S., & Treisman, D. (2019). Informational Autocrats. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 100-119.
  • Kuperman, A. J. (2008). The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 49-75.
  • Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211-230.
  • Mihaljinac, N., & Mevorah, V. (2019). Broken promises of Internet and democracy: Internet art in Serbia, 1996–2014. Media Culture & Society, 41(4), 535-550.
  • Nika, L. (2018). The Democratic Values of the Student Movement in Kosovo 1997/1999 and Their Echoes in Western Diplomacy. Review of European Studies, 10(2), 167-185.
  • Polese, A. (2009). Ukraine 2004: Informal Networks, Transformation of Social Capital and Coloured Revolutions. The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 25(2), 139-156.
  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
  • Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. P. (2000). Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Choice Reviews Online, 37(6), 4156-4157.
  • Tucker, J. A. (2007). Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5(3), 487-508.
← Prev Next →