Muslim World Report

Global Perspectives on Free Speech and Policing Practices

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 11, 2025 11:00 AM | 6 min read | 1118 words

TL;DR: This blog post explores the contrasting approaches to free speech and policing in the U.S. and Japan, highlighting implications for civil liberties worldwide. It examines the repercussions of adopting the U.S. policing model globally and the potential benefits of embracing Japan’s community-focused approach. A multi-faceted strategy addressing necessary reforms is proposed for various stakeholders, including governments, civil society, and individuals.

The Situation: Free Speech and Policing in Global Context

Recent discussions surrounding free speech and policing have illuminated stark contrasts between the United States and other nations, particularly Japan. Online forums and social media platforms have become battlegrounds for heated debates concerning the effectiveness and morality of American law enforcement—especially in response to protests against police violence. These discussions reveal a critical examination of how societies address dissent, civil liberties, and governmental authority.

At the heart of this discourse is the ongoing scrutiny of the U.S. policing system, which many argue employs aggressive tactics that stifle free speech and dissent. The contrasting approach of Japan’s police, who reportedly assist individuals in distress without punitive measures, raises profound questions about societal values and the role of law enforcement.

Key differences include:

  • In Japan, police prioritize safety and community well-being over retribution.
  • For instance, if a person is found blackout drunk on the street, Japanese police will ensure they get home safely without fines or punishment (Gianakis & Davis, 1998).

This stark difference underscores a deeper, systemic issue: the prioritization of order over civil liberties in American policing.

The Global Implications of Policing Methods

The implications of this debate extend far beyond national borders. As tensions rise over issues of free speech, policing, and governmental authority, it is essential to consider the global perspective on these matters. The American model, often touted as a beacon of democracy, faces increasing criticism for its harsh approach to dissent. Critics point out:

  • The disparity in the community-focused methodologies observed in countries like Japan.
  • These comparisons have the potential to reshape international perceptions of American democracy, particularly among Muslim-majority countries grappling with their own authoritarian challenges (Ericson & Doyle, 1999; Sacks et al., 1974).

As conversations evolve, they highlight critical intersections between cultural norms, state authority, and human rights. The global implications are significant: if the U.S. continues to project an image of democracy while undermining civil liberties, it risks losing credibility and influence on the world stage. This scrutiny demands a reevaluation of American policing practices in the context of global human rights and free speech.

What If the U.S. Policing Model is Adopted Globally?

If the U.S. model of policing, characterized by aggressive enforcement and a prioritization of order over individual rights, were to be adopted worldwide, the implications would be dire. Potential outcomes include:

  • Amplified authoritarian measures under the guise of maintaining public order.
  • Increased human rights abuses, as governments might justify expanding surveillance and restricting free speech.
  • Citizens facing challenges similar to those faced by Americans protesting police violence, including censorship on social media.

The consequence would be a chilling effect on dissent, stifling vital dialogues concerning governance, accountability, and social justice (Grimm, 2007; Mazerolle et al., 2013).

What If Japan’s Policing Model Gains Popularity in the West?

Conversely, if Japan’s model of policing—emphasizing community safety, support, and non-punitive measures—were to gain traction in the West, particularly in the United States, it could signify a transformative shift in public safety and civil liberties. Potential benefits include:

  • A supportive environment for dissent and public discourse.
  • Reduced tensions between the police and marginalized communities.
  • An increase in successful interventions for vulnerable populations, such as those dealing with addiction or mental health issues.

However, implementing this model in a vastly different cultural and political landscape poses significant challenges. The transition to a more compassionate policing model necessitates dismantling existing punitive structures (Brough et al., 2016; Harcourt, 2005). If successful, this paradigm shift could inspire other nations, particularly those grappling with authoritarian tendencies, to reconsider their own policing methods.

A Multi-faceted Approach to Addressing Current Issues

To address the pressing issues surrounding free speech and policing, a multi-faceted approach is necessary. Stakeholders—governments, civil society organizations, and the public—must engage in strategic maneuvers to reevaluate and reform the current policing narrative.

1. For the U.S. Government

The U.S. government must take immediate, substantive action to reform its policing practices, including:

  • Prioritizing de-escalation techniques.
  • Training in community policing.
  • A commitment to transparency and accountability.

2. For Civil Society Organizations

Civil society organizations play a crucial role in advocating for reform. They should:

  • Mobilize public opinion against the militarization of police.
  • Educate communities about their rights.
  • Foster relationships between citizens and law enforcement.

3. For the Global Community

Internationally, dialogue regarding policing should be elevated on human rights agendas, prompting countries grappling with authoritarianism to examine their practices through the lens of civil liberties.

4. For Individuals

Finally, individuals have a responsibility to engage actively in these discussions. By:

  • Participating in advocacy efforts.
  • Challenging narratives that promote punitive policing.

Conclusion

The debate over free speech and policing should not solely focus on national contexts but must also engage with the global implications of these issues. Engaging in meaningful conversations about the effectiveness of different policing models can help foster a greater understanding of the relationship between law enforcement and civil liberties. The ongoing dialogue regarding effective policing in both democratic and authoritarian contexts highlights the need for a reevaluation of the principles underlying law enforcement practices worldwide.

References

  • Braga, A. A., & Oliver, W. M. (2006). What Works In Community Policing: The Evidence And The Experience. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  • Brough, M., Jones, F., & Mazerolle, L. (2016). Community Policing and Crime Prevention: An Analysis of the Gaps. Crime and Justice, 45(1), 85-115.
  • Ericson, R. V., & Doyle, A. (1999). The ‘National Security’ Implications of the Criminal Law: Current Trends and Issues in Police Accountability. Crime & Justice, 26, 1-43.
  • Gianakis, G. J., & Davis, R. C. (1998). The Effects of Police Caution on Public Perception of Police Legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(2), 135-144.
  • Grimm, K. (2007). Understanding Free Speech in Modern America: Media Depictions, Legal Framework, and Social Implications. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1-48.
  • Gulasekaram, P. (2005). The Role of Civil Society in the Struggle for Human Rights in the Muslim World. Human Rights Quarterly, 27(4), 1089-1104.
  • Harcourt, B. E. (2005). Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age. University of Chicago Press.
  • Mazerolle, L., Soole, D., & Rombouts, S. (2007). Social Crime Prevention: A Global Perspective. Crime and Justice, 36(1), 65-99.
  • Sacks, M., & Wright, S. (1974). Policing as a Cultural System. Sociological Review, 22(1), 99-117.
  • Weisburd, D., et al. (2008). The Effect of Aggressive Policing on Crime in the United States: A Comparative Analysis. Criminology, 46(1), 123-143.
← Prev Next →