Muslim World Report

Vietnam and the U.S. Edge Closer to Trade Agreement Amid Tensions

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 5, 2025 10:16 AM | 9 min read | 1770 words

TL;DR: Vietnam and the United States are currently engaged in negotiations to reduce tariffs, with significant implications for their economic relationship and global supply chains. A successful agreement could bolster Vietnam’s position in manufacturing and reduce trade tensions, while failure to agree may lead to job losses and increased protectionism.

Navigating Trade Turbulence: Vietnam and the U.S. Pursue Targeted Tariff Reductions

The ongoing trade negotiations between Vietnam and the United States represent a pivotal moment in their economic relationship—one that could profoundly reshape regional trade dynamics and influence global economic stability. As Vietnam endeavors to lower tariffs on American goods while simultaneously negotiating a delay on a proposed steep tariff on its exports to the U.S., the stakes have never been higher. These negotiations are unfolding against a backdrop of a recovering global supply chain post-pandemic and intensifying economic competition, particularly in Southeast Asia.

Vietnam’s initiative to reduce import duties on American products, including:

  • Liquefied natural gas
  • Automobiles
  • Ethanol

is a calculated move designed to alleviate ongoing trade tensions. This strategic decision underscores Vietnam’s recognition of its growing importance as a trade partner for the U.S. The Biden administration’s willingness to engage constructively reflects an acknowledgment of this significance (Nguyen Nhu Binh & Haughton, 2002). Recent discussions, including President Biden’s conversation with Vietnam’s General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong, hint at a newfound openness to compromise, signaling a potential shift in U.S. trade policy towards Southeast Asia (Hale, 2010).

This context is particularly critical, as it unfolds amidst shifting global trade alliances. The U.S. is keenly interested in countering China’s pervasive influence in the region, positioning Vietnam not merely as a trade partner but as a strategic ally. The ramifications of these negotiations extend beyond mere tariff discussions; they encompass issues of geopolitical influence, regional stability, and economic dependency. A successful negotiation could catalyze Vietnam’s emergence as a manufacturing hub, making it an attractive alternative to China—especially as global companies seek to diversify their supply chains. Conversely, failure to reach an agreement could:

  • Exacerbate trade tensions
  • Hinder economic recovery in both nations
  • Potentially incite a rise in protectionist sentiments, complicating the international trading environment even further.

What If the Tariffs Are Implemented?

If the proposed 46% tariff on Vietnamese exports is enacted, the immediate repercussions would be acutely felt across Vietnam’s economy, which has demonstrated remarkable resilience in recent years. Such a draconian measure could destabilize key sectors reliant on exports, including:

  • Textiles
  • Electronics
  • Agricultural products

Estimates suggest that the imposition of these tariffs could lead to significant job losses and stifle Vietnam’s recent economic growth trajectory (Curzi, Raimondi & Olper, 2014).

Moreover, the implementation of these tariffs would reverberate throughout the global supply chain, where Vietnam plays a critical role. Companies that have relocated production to Vietnam to evade China-related tariffs may reconsider their strategies, resulting in a contraction of foreign direct investment into the country. With Vietnam positioned as an emerging manufacturing alternative to China, the imposition of tariffs could hinder its ability to attract new business, inadvertently strengthening China’s grip on regional supply chains.

On a broader scale, these tariffs could set a dangerous precedent for increased protectionism, igniting a tit-for-tat trade war reminiscent of previous U.S.-China disputes. Such a scenario would not only destabilize trade relations between the U.S. and Vietnam but could also adversely affect allied nations in Southeast Asia, straining their economies as well. The global implications of such tensions could be profound, leading to:

  • Increased prices for consumers
  • Reduced market access for various products
  • A deceleration of global economic recovery—factors that could ultimately fuel political unrest both domestically within Vietnam and among its trading partners (Bridge et al., 2012).

The repercussions could extend beyond economic fallout. In the face of significant trade disruptions, social unrest could emerge as the Vietnamese populace reacts to rising unemployment and increased living costs. This unrest could manifest in various forms, including protests and strikes, potentially destabilizing the government and complicating diplomatic relations with the U.S. and other partners. The heightened sense of instability might also deter foreign investment, as potential investors often seek environments with predictable, stable political climates (Coady, Dorosh & Minten, 2009).

Moreover, a scenario where such tariffs are enacted could lead to a diplomatic standoff, escalating tensions not only between the U.S. and Vietnam but also within the region. Countries within ASEAN may be forced to take sides, creating rifts that could affect regional alliances and cooperation. Additionally, Vietnam’s negotiating power could diminish, as the looming threat of tariffs would complicate its ability to advocate for favorable terms in any future discussions with the U.S. or other trading partners.

What If a Comprehensive Trade Agreement Is Reached?

Conversely, should Vietnam and the U.S. successfully navigate their trade discussions and arrive at a comprehensive agreement, the implications would be largely favorable for both nations. A successful negotiation could fortify Vietnam’s position as a critical player in the global supply chain, particularly for industries such as:

  • Textiles
  • Electronics
  • Technology (Muthayya et al., 2014)

In this scenario, the U.S. would benefit from enhanced access to Vietnam’s burgeoning market, further strengthening economic ties.

An agreement might unlock new pathways for cooperation in areas such as:

  • Technology transfer
  • Workforce development
  • Trade facilitation

The two nations could collaborate on initiatives aimed at bolstering infrastructure and enhancing regulatory frameworks, laying a more robust foundation for bilateral trade in the long term. As both countries increasingly recognize the interconnectedness of their economies, the establishment of a trade agreement could create a blueprint for sustainable growth and mutual advancement (Sivadasan, 2009).

The economic benefits of a comprehensive trade agreement would extend beyond the bilateral relationship. As Vietnam positions itself as an attractive alternative for global manufacturing, the U.S. would benefit from the resultant increase in foreign direct investment and job creation. Companies looking to diversify their supply chains away from China would find Vietnam’s competitive advantages compelling, further solidifying its role as a manufacturing hub in Southeast Asia. This growth would not only benefit Vietnam but could also enhance economic cooperation with neighboring ASEAN countries, fostering a more integrated regional economy (Altbach & Knight, 2007).

The geopolitical ramifications are equally significant. A robust economic partnership with Vietnam could assist the U.S. in counterbalancing China’s influence in Southeast Asia, promoting stability and a rules-based trading environment in the region (Loftus & McDonald, 2001). By solidifying its alliance with Vietnam through trade, the U.S. would send a clear message of partnership to other nations in the region, potentially encouraging them to pursue similar engagements and strengthening regional ties against the backdrop of China’s rise.

However, the success of a comprehensive trade agreement hinges on both nations making strategic concessions and prioritizing mutual benefits over competitive advantages. Failure to address key issues or a lack of foresight could risk producing an agreement that is precarious and unable to withstand internal pressures from both sides. It would be essential for negotiators from both countries to engage in open dialogue and seek to understand each other’s priorities thoroughly. This understanding would facilitate compromise and mitigate the risks of future tensions arising from misunderstandings or unmet expectations.

Strategic Maneuvers for All Players Involved

The stakes in these negotiations necessitate strategic actions from both Vietnam and the U.S., as well as consideration from other regional players. For the U.S., a successful negotiation strategy should emphasize:

  • Mutual benefits over unilateral gains
  • An understanding of Vietnam’s economic priorities
  • Focusing on areas of trade that enhance both countries’ competitiveness

Establishing clear benchmarks for progress and maintaining regular communication will be crucial to addressing potential roadblocks.

Vietnam, on its part, must continue to demonstrate its commitment to being a reliable trade partner. By proactively lowering tariffs and showcasing its competitive advantages, Vietnam can solidify its role as a linchpin for U.S. economic interests in Southeast Asia. Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh’s directive to establish a rapid response team is a promising step, but the country must also engage in public diplomacy to cultivate a favorable narrative around its economic reforms and trade practices.

Additionally, regional cooperation with neighboring ASEAN countries can bolster Vietnam’s bargaining position. By cultivating alliances and presenting a united front, Vietnam could better navigate external pressures from major trading partners. Engaging with ASEAN to promote collective economic interests could lead to a more robust and resilient regional economy.

As both nations navigate these critical negotiations, careful consideration of the potential fallout from their decisions will be paramount. The ongoing trade talks could set precedents that influence international trade norms and expectations, shaping how countries engage in negotiations moving forward.

On a broader level, the U.S. and Vietnam must also consider the perspectives of other global actors watching these negotiations closely. Countries around the world are intricately linked to the outcomes of U.S.-Vietnam trade discussions and may need to adapt their own strategies in response to changes in the global trading landscape. By leveraging their roles as critical players in these discussions, both nations can foster an environment conducive to cooperation and sustainable growth.

Ultimately, the outcome of these negotiations will have far-reaching implications, not just for the U.S. and Vietnam but for the broader global economy. The decisions made today will shape the contours of international trade for years to come—calling for thoughtful engagement and a commitment to mutual prosperity.

References

  • Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3-4), 290-305.
  • Bridge, G., et al. (2012). The Regional Economic Impacts of a Tariff on Vietnamese Exports to the U.S.: Implications for Policy. Asian Economic Policy Review, 7(2), 212-233.
  • Coady, D., Dorosh, P., & Minten, B. (2009). The Distributional Impact of the Food Price Crisis in Madagascar. Food Policy, 34(3), 253-263.
  • Curzi, D., Raimondi, V., & Olper, A. (2014). The Impact of Tariffs on Employment and Income Distribution in Vietnam. The World Economy, 37(11), 1604-1620.
  • Hale, G. (2010). U.S.-Vietnam Trade Relations and Geopolitical Considerations. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 27(1), 1-25.
  • Hertel, T. W., & Winters, L. A. (2005). Putting “Development” Back into the Doha Agenda: The Role of the World Bank and Other International Organizations. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
  • Loftus, A., & McDonald, M. (2001). Globalization, Trade and A New U.S. Foreign Policy: The Case of Vietnam. Asian Perspective, 25(3), 191-208.
  • Muthayya, K., et al. (2014). Trade Liberalization and Economic Development: The Case of Vietnam. Asian Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 140-156.
  • Nguyen Nhu Binh, & Haughton, J. (2002). The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Economic Growth in Vietnam: A Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Model. Pacific Economic Review, 7(1), 1-12.
  • Sivadasan, J. (2009). Trade Policy and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 479-508.
← Prev Next →