Muslim World Report

Lee Jae-myung Challenges South Korea's Conglomerates on Ethics

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 14, 2025 9:39 AM | 7 min read | 1321 words

TL;DR: President Lee Jae-myung is advocating for an ethical transformation among South Korean conglomerates to combat exploitative practices. This call reflects a significant opportunity for both domestic and global corporate responsibility, as failure to adopt these principles could lead to consumer distrust, economic repercussions, and damage to South Korea’s international reputation.

The Ethical Shift in South Korean Business: A Path Forward

On October 13, 2023, President Lee Jae-myung of South Korea convened a critical roundtable with leaders from the nation’s largest conglomerates, including Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong. This meeting surfaced against a backdrop of growing public discontent with corporate practices that have long been viewed as exploitative and unfair. President Lee’s call for a shift toward ethical growth practices represents a significant pivot in South Korea’s economic narrative. This moment transcends domestic concerns; it resonates globally, placing South Korea at a crossroads where it can either:

  • Entrench itself further into established practices
  • Emerge as a leader in corporate accountability

The Global Resonance of Ethical Business Practices

The implications of this ethical shift extend far beyond South Korea’s borders. As global markets become increasingly interconnected, the actions taken by South Korean conglomerates could set important precedents for multinational businesses worldwide. If these corporate giants embrace ethical business practices, they may catalyze similar movements in other nations, particularly in Asia, where corporate governance often lacks transparency and accountability (Chapple & Moon, 2005). The potential for fostering greater trust among consumers, investors, and the general public is significant, offering a paradigm shift in how businesses engage with social responsibility.

Moreover, this reflects a growing recognition among both governments and businesses that ethical practices are:

  • Not merely moral obligations
  • Viable business strategies in an era where consumers demand sustainable and equitable practices (Vermeulen et al., 2012)

What If President Lee’s Call Goes Unheeded?

Should President Lee’s appeal for ethical growth practices be disregarded by South Korean conglomerates, the ramifications could be severe. A failure to adopt these principles may lead to:

  • Public skepticism and distrust, resulting in significant backlash against corporate entities.
  • A perception of conglomerates as self-serving, eroding the social contract between the public and the corporate sector.

Such discontent could manifest in shifting consumer behaviors:

  • Younger South Koreans aligning their spending habits with their values.
  • A potential shift toward smaller, more socially responsible businesses, undermining the market positions of established conglomerates.

Moreover, the international business community may respond negatively, resulting in diminished foreign investment. Investors are increasingly wary of engaging with companies that fail to prioritize ethical standards, opting instead for firms that demonstrate accountability and sustainability.

In a geopolitical context, failing to embrace ethical practices could hinder South Korea’s soft power. As the nation seeks to position itself as a leader in technology and innovation, an association with exploitative practices could dilute its brand identity, ultimately impacting national security (Radcliffe et al., 2016).

The Risks of Superficial Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility

Conversely, if South Korean conglomerates implement ethical practices but fail to execute them effectively, the results could be mixed.

On one hand, initial adoption might restore some public confidence and improve the image of these corporations. However, superficial changes without genuine commitment could lead to accusations of “greenwashing,” where companies are perceived as making empty gestures rather than engaging in meaningful reform (Bushman et al., 2004).

If conglomerates only undertake cosmetic changes:

  • Public outrage could intensify.
  • Citizens are becoming increasingly savvy and can easily discern when companies lack genuine commitment to ethical practices.

Internationally, ineffective implementation could limit the potential benefits of being seen as a leader in ethical practices. If results fall short, other countries may quickly dismiss South Korea as a case study. Additionally, ineffective implementation can lead to internal strife within conglomerates, causing employee disillusionment and reduced morale (Hess, 2005).

Paving the Way for Genuine Commitment

If South Korean conglomerates fully commit to ethical growth practices, the impacts could be transformative, both domestically and globally. Such commitment could rejuvenate public trust in major corporations, strengthening consumer confidence not just in corporate entities but in the broader economy. By embracing:

  • Transparency
  • Fair competition
  • Sustainable practices

These conglomerates could emerge as influential leaders in the global movement toward corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Chapple & Moon, 2005).

This shift could lead to a more equitable economic landscape. By prioritizing ethical practices, conglomerates may:

  • Set new standards for the industry across South Korea.
  • Compel smaller businesses to follow suit, contributing to a balanced economy where ethical considerations drive competitive advantages.

On the global stage, a full commitment to ethical practices could reshape perceptions of South Korea itself. The nation could position itself as an exemplar of ethical corporate governance, influencing policies and practices worldwide.

However, for this commitment to be realized, continuous oversight and regulatory measures must be in place. The government, civil society, and consumer advocacy groups must collaborate to ensure that these new ethical norms are not only established but maintained (Hess, 2007; Stiglitz, 2002).

Strategic Maneuvers for Ethical Transformation

To navigate this critical juncture, various stakeholders must adopt strategic approaches that bolster President Lee’s vision for sustainable corporate practices. For instance, conglomerates must undertake internal reforms that cultivate a genuine commitment to ethical business practices, including:

  • Restructuring boards of directors to include independent members with expertise in corporate ethics.
  • Providing comprehensive training programs for employees.
  • Fostering an environment where ethical behavior is both expected and rewarded (Radcliffe et al., 2016).

The government plays a vital role by enacting robust regulatory frameworks that promote transparency and accountability in corporate practices. This includes:

  • Implementing stricter penalties for unethical behavior.
  • Establishing whistleblower protections.
  • Creating independent oversight bodies to monitor corporate compliance with ethical standards (Davis & Caldeira, 2010).

Civil society must also engage actively in this transition. Advocacy groups should push for greater transparency and hold companies accountable for their ethical claims. By amplifying public discourse around corporate ethics, these organizations can influence consumer behavior and expectations (Hess, 2007).

Moreover, international collaborations will be essential in reinforcing the shift toward ethical growth practices. South Korean conglomerates should actively engage in international forums and partnerships that promote corporate social responsibility. By sharing best practices and learning from global leaders, South Korean firms can integrate their efforts into a larger global movement.

In conclusion, as President Lee Jae-myung advocates for a transformative shift in South Korea’s corporate landscape, the path ahead is illuminated with potential. While challenges abound, a collective commitment from stakeholders can facilitate meaningful change. South Korea stands at a pivotal moment, poised to lead by example in the global quest for ethical business practices. The world is watching, and it is time for South Korea to rise to the occasion.

References

  • Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D., & Smith, A. J. (2004). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2004.00136.x
  • Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia. Business & Society, 44(4), 413-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305281658
  • Davis, S. J., & Caldeira, K. (2010). Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(12), 5687-5692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906974107
  • Hess, D. (2005). The role of social reporting in creating a more sustainable corporate environment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 347-371. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200517348
  • Hess, D. (2007). Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 347-371. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200717348
  • Kolk, A. (2006). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: The role of the board of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 421-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00532.x
  • Radcliffe, V. S., Spence, C., & Stein, M. (2016). The impotence of accountability: The relationship between greater transparency and corporate reform. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 1135-1160. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12277
  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Participation and development: Perspectives from the comprehensive development paradigm. Review of Development Economics, 6(2), 164-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00148
  • Vermeulen, W. J., & Koenen, M. (2012). The role of collaborative partnerships in sustainable development: The challenge of accountability. Sustainable Development, 20(3), 186-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.763
  • Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 58-72. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2008.34587997
← Prev Next →