Muslim World Report

US Underwater Mining Risks International Law and Environmental Chaos

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 26, 2025 11:44 AM | 7 min read | 1456 words

TL;DR: The U.S.’s unilateral approach to underwater mining risks violating international law and endangering marine ecosystems. A collaborative and sustainable framework is essential to prevent ecological and geopolitical chaos.

The Perils of Ignoring International Law in Underwater Mining

The increasing urgency surrounding the issue of underwater mining in international waters is underscored by a troubling trend: the United States appears to be moving toward bypassing ongoing United Nations negotiations aimed at establishing a coherent international legal framework for such activities. While this action does not overtly violate international law, it signifies a blatant disregard for the collaborative processes that many nations have respected. This could set off a cascade of legal and ethical violations that threaten not only the oceans but also the integrity of international relations (Kaufman, 2018; Pogge, 2005).

Historically, negotiations within the UN have struggled to reach a consensus on mining in international waters. Key points include:

  • Opposition: Many member states—particularly those directly affected by potential mining operations—strongly oppose the practice.
  • Regulatory Vacuum: The protracted nature of these discussions, expected to last years, has left a regulatory void that the U.S. government now threatens to fill unilaterally.
  • Potential Chaos: Ignoring collective agreements could lead to a free-for-all in our oceans (Meier, Habibi, & Yang, 2020; Graditzky, 1998).

The Unraveling of Collaborative Governance

This blatant disregard for international law is not an isolated incident; it reflects a broader pattern of American exceptionalism that undermines global governance structures. The U.S. has shown a clear preference for unilateral action over cooperative diplomacy, often dismissing or violating treaties and international agreements—such as those under the WTO, CUSMA, and the International Criminal Court (Noyes, 2007; Lee, 2010). This trend represents a fundamental shift in how powerful nations engage with international law, impacting global governance and collaboration.

Moreover, while the U.S. leads this charge, China has also been egregious in its disregard for maritime law, especially in the South China Sea, where it has:

  • Engaged in territorial expansion
  • Constructed artificial islands
  • Established military bases

China’s “Nine-Dash Line” claims infringe on the territorial waters of Vietnam, the Philippines, and Malaysia. Such actions destabilize regional security and reinforce China’s narrative of victimhood (Hu et al., 2019; Chao, 2018). This creates a dangerous cycle where both nations engage in a game of geopolitical chess while ignoring the very rules they profess to uphold (Mattila et al., 2017).

What If Scenarios: The Implications of Unilateral Actions

What If the U.S. Moves Forward Unilaterally?

If the United States proceeds with unilateral underwater mining activities, the following may occur:

  • Erosion of Collaborative Frameworks: Such action could undermine the collaborative framework established by the UN.
  • Environmental Harm: Marine ecosystems could suffer from a “race to the bottom,” prioritizing short-term economic gains over long-term sustainability.
  • Ethical Concerns: Exploitation without regulation threatens marine biodiversity and endangers the livelihoods of communities relying on these ecosystems.
  • Increased Conflict: Tensions over maritime boundaries and resources could destabilize international relations, possibly leading to military confrontations.

What If Other Countries Follow Suit?

A significant concern is the likelihood that other nations may follow the U.S. example. Potential impacts include:

  • Unchecked Environmental Degradation: Other nations acting unilaterally could lead to environmental crises, species extinction, and habitat loss.
  • Historical Precedent: Past examples, such as the overfishing crisis, illustrate the dangers of a lack of collective enforcement of rules (Vince & Hardesty, 2016).

The Role of International Law and Governance

As we navigate these complex waters, the role of international law becomes increasingly paramount. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides a framework for governing the world’s oceans and facilitating cooperation among nations. However, this framework’s effectiveness relies heavily on adherence by member states. The U.S.’s unwillingness to engage with established norms could undermine maritime governance (Weiss, 2000).

The global community must foster engagement and dialogue, emphasizing respect for international law. By advocating for:

  • Collective Action
  • Adherence to Established Norms

We can help preserve the integrity of our oceans and respect the rights of all nations, especially those that are smaller and more vulnerable.

Addressing Domestic Concerns with a Global Perspective

As citizens of individual nations, we must approach these issues from both domestic and global perspectives. It’s vital for the public to engage in dialogue and advocate for policies reflecting a commitment to international cooperation. Citizen advocacy can shape national policies aligned with international legal frameworks, countering trends of isolationism and unilateralism.

The Intricacies of National Sovereignty

The discussions surrounding underwater mining highlight the complex relationship between national sovereignty and global governance. Nations must balance protecting national interests while engaging collaboratively to address global challenges.

The erosion of international norms has significant implications for national sovereignty, particularly for smaller nations relying on international law to protect their interests. Countries like Canada, impacted by larger powers, may find their sovereignty compromised as they navigate international relations (Hameiri & Jones, 2018).

Fostering Responsible Stewardship

The urgency surrounding underwater mining underscores the need for responsible stewardship of marine resources. Potential environmental consequences of unregulated mining jeopardize not only marine ecosystems but also the health of our planet. Collaborative frameworks that prioritize sustainable practices can help protect fragile environments.

Imagine if the global community emphasized stewardship over exploitation. By fostering responsible resource management, nations could work together toward a sustainable future that respects international law and prioritizes healthy marine ecosystems.

The Path Forward: Collective Action and Responsibility

The international community must unite to advocate for adherence to international law and collective action regarding underwater mining. This responsibility extends beyond individual nations; it requires collaboration among:

  • Civil Society
  • Businesses
  • Governments

In light of the current geopolitical climate, the need for dialogue becomes even more pressing. By creating platforms for discussion at national and international levels, we can facilitate the exchange of ideas and foster collaboration. This engagement is essential to navigate the complexities of underwater mining and ensure future generations inherit a sustainable ocean.

As the world watches this unfolding drama, it is crucial for informed citizens to focus on pressing issues like these. The current political climate, rife with misinformation and trivial debates, distracts from the substantial threats posed by both American and Chinese actions in international waters.

Emphasizing the Importance of Global Governance

While the events surrounding underwater mining are alarming, they present an opportunity for the global community to re-evaluate its approach to governance. The challenges of unilateral actions emphasize the need for robust international frameworks prioritizing cooperation and respect for international law. Strengthening these institutions will help mitigate the risks associated with competitive exploitation of marine resources.

As geopolitical tensions rise, it is imperative to advocate for a world in which international law serves as the guiding principle for interactions among nations. The preservation of marine ecosystems and the rights of smaller countries depend on our collective commitment to uphold these values.

The implications of unilateral underwater mining are profound. It is not merely an environmental concern; it is a matter of governance, international cooperation, and the future of our global community. The actions of the U.S. and China will shape the landscape of underwater mining and set the tone for future international relations. The onus is on all nations to engage collaboratively to establish frameworks that prioritize sustainability, cooperation, and respect for international norms.

In conclusion, the potential repercussions of ignoring international law in underwater mining extend far beyond immediate environmental impacts. The future of global governance hangs in the balance, and the choices made today will undoubtedly reverberate for generations to come.

References:

  • Chao, S. (2018). In the Shadow of the Palm: Dispersed Ontologies among Marind, West Papua. Cultural Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.4.08

  • Graditzky, T. (1998). Individual criminal responsibility for violations of international humanitarian law committed in non-international armed conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020860400090756

  • Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2018). China challenges global governance? Chinese international development finance and the AIIB. International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy026

  • Kaufman, Z. D. (2018). The Prospects, Problems and Proliferation of Recent UN Investigations of International Law Violations. Journal of International Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqy001

  • Lee, K. (2010). How do we move forward on the social determinants of health: the global governance challenges. Critical Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590903563573

  • Meier, B. M., Habibi, R., & Yang, Y. T. (2020). Travel restrictions violate international law. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb6950

  • Noyes, J. E. (2007). U.S. Policy and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The George Washington International Law Review.

  • Pogge, T. (2005). Recognized and Violated by International Law: The Human Rights of the Global Poor. Leiden Journal of International Law. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156505002980

  • Vince, J., & Hardesty, B. D. (2016). Plastic pollution challenges in marine and coastal environments: from local to global governance. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12388

  • Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/713701075

← Prev Next →