Muslim World Report

Employee Quits After Being Labeled 'Just a Number' Costing Rs 2.5 Crore

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | May 4, 2025 11:07 AM | 9 min read | 1867 words

TL;DR: A tech employee’s resignation, after being labeled “just a number,” resulted in a ₹2.5 crore loss for the company, showcasing the urgent need for organizations to recognize employee value and improving workplace culture. If the trend continues, it could lead to a significant shift in employee retention strategies and labor practices across the industry.

The Tech Industry’s Dilemma: A Case Study on Employee Value

In a striking incident that has reverberated through the corporate landscape, a tech employee resigned after being derogatorily labeled as “just a number” by his manager. This moment of frustration was not merely personal; it resulted in a staggering financial blow to the company, costing ₹2.5 crore. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the growing discontent in industries dominated by a transactional approach to employee relations, particularly within body shop companies. These organizations, often viewed as mere intermediaries, prioritize billable hours over individual contributions, treating employees as interchangeable cogs in a vast machinery engineered for profit maximization (Bhatnagar, 2007).

Such treatment leads to an unsustainable work environment where talent feels undervalued and expendable. The implications extend far beyond this single incident. In a global market where talent is both a scarce resource and a key competitive advantage, the failure to recognize and retain skilled employees can have detrimental effects, including:

  • Financial Losses: Companies suffer from decreased productivity and increased turnover costs.
  • Decreased Morale: Employee disengagement leads to a toxic workplace atmosphere.
  • Industry Standards: Failing to retain talent can lower overall industry benchmarks.

The tech sector, already grappling with high turnover rates, faces a growing crisis: how to maintain morale and productivity when employees feel alienated and unappreciated.

This incident also highlights broader societal issues concerning labor rights and the treatment of workers in emerging economies. As companies seek to cut costs and maximize efficiency, there is a troubling tendency to overlook the human aspect of business. The resignation reflects a growing consciousness among employees who demand respect and acknowledgment of their skills beyond their billable hours (Cattermole, 2018). It raises fundamental questions about the relationship between companies and employees—who are often treated as temporary resources rather than valued collaborators. In this model, the companies themselves become “just a number” in an Excel spreadsheet to their clients, lacking any substantive value beyond the skill sets of their employees.

The response from this employee may appear as a courageous stand against a culture of exploitation. However, the broader implications of such a paradigm shift could reshape the tech industry’s labor dynamics, affecting how companies approach employee engagement and retention strategies in the long run.

What If More Employees Follow Suit?

If this incident sparks a movement where employees from similar companies resign en masse, it could lead to significant disruptions within the tech industry. A collective movement out of companies that devalue their workers might encourage professionals to reassess their own working conditions. This could create a labor shortage in certain sectors, compelling companies to address employee grievances more seriously.

As employees leave in protest, organizations may be forced to alter their operational frameworks to focus more on employee well-being. This could result in:

  • Increased Compensation: Higher pay to attract and retain talent.
  • Improved Workplace Culture: An enhanced focus on employee engagement and satisfaction.
  • Professional Development Opportunities: Programs designed to foster employee growth.

If companies fail to adapt, they risk losing not only skilled individuals but also their competitive edge in a rapidly evolving market.

Moreover, a mass exodus could catalyze a broader reckoning regarding labor practices in tech. It might inspire a reformation in industry standards that recognizes the intrinsic value of employees as integral to company success. Such a shift could spark a movement across various sectors, prompting more workers to stand up against employers who see them merely as expendable resources.

What If Corporations Ignore the Signs?

Conversely, if corporations continue to disregard the underlying issues that led to this incident, they could face even greater financial repercussions. By maintaining a narrow focus solely on profit margins and short-term productivity, these companies risk alienating their workforce. As resentment builds, the potential for increased turnover becomes a tangible threat.

This path presents a dire scenario where companies struggle to attract new talent. The tech sector thrives on innovation, driven by skilled and engaged individuals. An environment characterized by employee disengagement could stifle creativity and innovation, ultimately leading to stagnation in companies that fail to adapt.

Additionally, ignoring these signs may tarnish a company’s public image. In an era dominated by social media, negative narratives can spread rapidly. If employees share their discontent with the wider world, it could deter potential talent, making it increasingly difficult for companies to recruit skilled workers in the future. Furthermore, such disregard may invite scrutiny from investors who are increasingly concerned about the ethical implications of workplace culture (Fungai Banhwa et al., 2014).

What If Companies Embrace Change?

Should companies respond proactively to the incident by embracing changes in workplace culture, they could distinguish themselves in a competitive market. A focus on employee engagement, inclusivity, and recognition of individual contributions may not only retain existing talent but also attract new employees seeking a positive work environment (Gamst, 1991).

If major players in the tech industry adopt comprehensive strategies to foster a more supportive culture, it could lead to a domino effect across the sector. Companies that prioritize their employees’ well-being often experience:

  • Better Productivity: Engaged employees are more motivated.
  • Higher Job Satisfaction: A positive culture boosts morale.
  • Improved Overall Performance: Retained talent drives success.

Furthermore, this could pave the way for more ethical business practices, where companies are held accountable not just for their financial performance but also for their treatment of employees. This shift might inspire a new generation of leaders who prioritize people over profits, creating an industry environment that promotes sustainable growth while honoring the contributions of all workers.

A Holistic Approach to Employee Value

To address these unfolding dynamics, all players in the tech industry—employees, corporations, and policymakers—must take strategic actions:

  • For Employees: Solidarity is paramount. Workers should organize to share their experiences, building networks that can amplify their voices. Collective bargaining or informal alliances can empower employees to negotiate for better terms and working conditions. Leveraging social media platforms can help hold corporations accountable and mobilize support. The rise of digital platforms has also opened avenues for anonymous feedback mechanisms, allowing employees to voice their concerns without fear of reprisal (Bal, Kooij, & de Jong, 2013).

  • For Corporations: Companies must undertake comprehensive reviews of their workplace policies. A shift towards transparency, regular employee feedback channels, and the adoption of fair compensation practices can foster a healthier work environment (Gakovic & Tetrick, 2003). Organizations should focus on creating an inclusive culture that values diversity and contributions from all employees, recognizing that a diverse workforce is integral to driving innovation and creativity (Cattermole, 2018).

  • For Policymakers: Advocating for labor laws that promote fair treatment and job security in high-stakes industries, such as technology, is crucial. Governments should support workforce development programs that encourage skill acquisition and professional growth while incentivizing companies to prioritize ethical labor practices (Amrute, 2020). Moreover, policymakers can facilitate dialogue between tech companies and employee advocacy groups, helping to create frameworks that align corporate interests with employee welfare.

The Role of Leadership in Cultural Transformation

As industry leaders review their organizational structures, they must consider the intrinsic value of human capital. Leadership sets the tone for organizational culture; thus, the commitment to nurturing employee relationships must start at the top. Leaders should engage in open and honest communications, ensuring that feedback from employees at all levels is not only welcomed but actively sought out (McManus & Mosca, 2015).

Training programs focused on emotional intelligence and empathetic leadership can equip managers with the tools necessary to foster a supportive environment. By investing time in understanding employee needs and concerns, leaders can transform the workplace atmosphere into one that emphasizes collaboration, respect, and mutual growth.

Additionally, implementing results-oriented performance evaluations can shift focus from archaic metrics like billable hours to more meaningful measures of contribution and impact. Recognizing achievements, whether large or small, can boost morale and solidify a sense of belonging within the organization. This investment in human capital will yield substantial returns in the form of loyalty and engagement.

Building a Cooperative Ecosystem

The potential for a more harmonious relationship between companies and employees hinges on collaboration and shared responsibility. Companies must recognize that the employee experience directly aligns with customer satisfaction and ultimately affects the bottom line. When employees are empowered and engaged, they are more likely to deliver exceptional service to clients, leading to improved business outcomes.

To cultivate this cooperative ecosystem, organizations can initiate partnerships with educational institutions and professional associations. Such collaborations can help bridge the skills gap by ensuring that curricula align with current industry needs, preparing students for the workforce while providing companies with a pipeline of qualified candidates.

Moreover, employee development programs—ranging from mentorship opportunities to continuous learning initiatives—can foster a culture of growth that benefits both the employee and the organization. As companies invest in their workforce, they signal a commitment not just to their immediate business goals but to the long-term success of their employees.

A Call to Action

The case of the tech employee who resigned encapsulates a growing trend that demands urgent action from all stakeholders involved in the tech industry. Actions needed include:

  • Employees: Rally together, forming networks and alliances to amplify their voices.
  • Corporations: Engage in introspective assessments of their workplace cultures, adopting transparent practices that prioritize employee feedback and fair compensation (Bal, Kooij, & de Jong, 2013).
  • Policymakers: Advocate for labor laws that promote fair treatment and job security, especially in high-stakes industries dominated by technology.

As the industry shifts, all stakeholders are called upon to contribute actively to a new narrative—one that values individuals and their contributions alongside profit. By prioritizing employee wellness and creating an inclusive culture, the tech industry can lead the way in redefining modern work environments.

References

  • Amrute, S. (2020). Bored techies being casually racist: Race as algorithm. Science Technology & Human Values, doi:10.1177/0162243920912824.
  • Bal, M., Kooij, D., & de Jong, S. (2013). How Do Developmental and Accommodative HRM Enhance Employee Engagement and Commitment? The Role of Psychological Contract and SOC Strategies. Journal of Management Studies, doi:10.1111/joms.12028.
  • Bhatnagar, J. (2007). Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: Key to retention. Employee Relations, doi:10.1108/01425450710826122.
  • Cattermole, G. (2018). Creating an employee engagement strategy for millennials. Strategic HR Review, doi:10.1108/shr-07-2018-0059.
  • Fungai Banhwa, P., Chipunza, C., & Chamisa, S. F. (2014). The Influence of Organisational Employee Engagement Strategies on Organisational Citizenship Behaviour within Retail Banking: A Case of Amatole District Municipality. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n6p53.
  • Gamst, F. C. (1991). Foundations of social theory. Anthropology of Work Review, doi:10.1525/awr.1991.12.3.19.
  • Gakovic, A., & Tetrick, L. E. (2003). Perceived organizational support and work status: A comparison of the employment relationships of part-time and full-time employees attending university classes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, doi:10.1002/job.206.
  • Kumar, V., & Pansari, A. (2015). Competitive Advantage through Engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, doi:10.1509/jmr.15.0044.
  • McManus, J., & Mosca, J. B. (2015). Strategies To Build Trust And Improve Employee Engagement. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), doi:10.19030/ijmis.v19i1.9056.
← Prev Next →