Muslim World Report

Democracy's Decline: The Economic Risks of Political Erosion

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 21, 2025 10:14 AM | 6 min read | 1093 words

Democracy’s Decline: The Economic Risks of Political Erosion

TL;DR: The recent downgrade of the U.S. bond rating underscores the urgent link between democratic erosion and economic stability. Political instability not only threatens economic growth but also investor confidence, both domestically and globally.

Democratic Erosion and Economic Consequences: An Urgent Call to Recognize the Connection

The recent downgrade of the United States’ bond rating from AAA to AA+ has ignited a critical conversation about the intersection of democratic institutions and economic health. As we approach April 2025, this downgrade reflects deteriorating political stability and symbolizes a broader global trend. Countries experiencing democratic backsliding are increasingly at risk of similar financial downgrades.

Factors Contributing to Democratic Erosion:

  • Republican brinksmanship
  • Election denialism
  • Absence of responsible governance following the January 6th Capitol riots

These factors have collectively undermined trust in democratic institutions. This declining trust jeopardizes the integrity of our political systems, paving the way for reckless economic policies that can lead to defaults and threaten sustainable economic growth.

Democracy, characterized by institutional accountability and citizen participation, has long been associated with better economic outcomes. Historical evidence overwhelmingly supports the notion that:

  • Democratic states create conditions conducive to sustainable economic growth through robust institutional structures that promote investment, innovation, and broad-based prosperity (Mansfield & Pevehouse, 2006).

In contrast, while authoritarian regimes—like China—may showcase impressive short-term growth figures, they often grapple with systemic issues, including:

  • Corruption
  • Misallocation of resources
  • Entrenchment of elite power (Huntington, 1991)

These regimes prioritize stability over long-term development, ultimately undermining their economic records. The recent bond downgrade serves as a stark warning about the fragility of the U.S. economic landscape, as the convergence of political instability and economic mismanagement mirrors past downgrades, such as in 2011.

Economic Implications of Democratic Erosion:

  1. Reduced bond ratings signal diminished confidence among investors. This could lead to:

    • Increased borrowing costs
    • Escalating federal deficits (Reinhart, 2002)

  2. Fiscal strains could severely hinder public investment in crucial social services, widening economic inequalities.

  3. A diminishing dollar could challenge its status as the world’s primary reserve currency, prompting nations like China and Russia to elevate their currencies in response (Kliger & Sarig, 2000).

  4. Domestically, an economic downturn could further erode trust in political institutions. Political polarization could deepen (McCoy et al., 2018), leading to intensified civil unrest and the emergence of radical movements.

Global Consequences of Democratic Erosion

The implications of this trend extend globally, highlighting how the erosion of democracy influences:

  • Foreign investment flows
  • International relations

Countries perceived as unstable due to democratic decline risk losing out on foreign investment, exacerbating economic distress. Authoritarian regimes may exploit these democratic failings to consolidate their power, promising stability in exchange for social and political repression.

What If the U.S. Faces Further Rating Downgrades?

Should the U.S. endure further downgrades in its bond rating, the ramifications could be severe:

  1. Higher borrowing costs may lead to:

    • Inflated federal deficits
    • Severe constraints on funding for essential services (education, healthcare, infrastructure)

  2. A diminished dollar would have profound implications for global trade, triggering a reorientation of economic alliances and the rise of alternative currencies.

  3. Public confidence in government institutions may erode, triggering:

    • Increased polarization
    • Civil unrest
    • Emergence of radical political movements

What If Other Democratic Nations Experience Similar Erosion?

The consequences of democratic erosion are not confined to the U.S.; other democratic nations could face similar crises. If countries worldwide experience bond rating downgrades stemming from democratic backsliding, the implications could be severe:

  • Crises of legitimacy in nations that have long championed democracy could create a domino effect, where political instability breeds economic turmoil (Houle, 2009).

Potential Scenarios:

  • In Europe, the rise of populism and nationalism could jeopardize the stability of the European Union, with countries like Italy, Spain, or Hungary facing parallel trends (Hanley & Vachudová, 2018).

  • Migration flows may increase, as citizens of nations experiencing democratic backsliding seek refuge in more stable societies, creating humanitarian and logistical challenges (Murray & Longo, 2018).

What If the Political Landscape Shifts Back Towards Stability?

Conversely, if the political landscape in the United States—and potentially other democracies—shifts back towards stability, the implications could be profoundly positive for both democracy and the economy:

  1. Restoring confidence in democratic institutions could stabilize or improve bond ratings, leading to lower borrowing costs and increased public investment in critical sectors (Jensen & Wantchékon, 2004).

  2. A reinvigorated democratic spirit could foster a more engaged citizenry, increasing political participation and accountability from elected officials.

  3. Internationally, a return to democratic norms could help restore faith in the democratic project, bolstering alliances and providing a counter-narrative to authoritarian regimes.

However, this positive scenario hinges on addressing the root causes of political polarization and ensuring that economic policies are inclusive. For stability to be sustainable, democratic institutions must be fortified to resist future backsliding.

In conclusion, the recent bond rating downgrade of the United States serves as a wake-up call regarding the interconnectedness of democracy, governance, and economic health. Addressing the challenges of political instability and restoring faith in democratic institutions is crucial, not only for the U.S. but also for the future of democracies worldwide. The stakes are high, and concerted efforts will be required to navigate this complex and pressing landscape.

References

  • Bermeo, N. (2016). On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5-19.
  • Christiansen, J., Heinrich, T., & Peterson, C. (2019). The Impact of Political Instability on Foreign Investment: Evidence from a Global Survey. World Politics, 71(2), 247-278.
  • Dawson, J. & Hanley, S. (2018). Democratic Erosion in the European Union: The Central and Eastern European Experience. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 297-319.
  • Doyle, M. W. (1986). Liberalism and World Politics. The American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1151-1169.
  • Hanley, S., & Vachudová, M. A. (2018). The Ins and Outs of Populism: European Responses to Democratic Erosion. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 345-370.
  • Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Jensen, C. & Wantchékon, L. (2004). The Effect of Democratization on Economic Growth: Evidence from Africa. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 187-217.
  • Kliger, D., & Sarig, O. (2000). The Role of the U.S. Dollar in the International Monetary System. Finance Research Letters, 3(1), 83-90.
  • Mansfield, E. D., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2006). Democratization and International Trade. International Organization, 60(3), 337-374.
  • McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: A Supply-Side Approach. The American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16-57.
  • Murray, L. & Longo, M. (2018). The Global Migration Crisis: The Impact of Authoritarian Backsliding. Migration Studies, 6(2), 258-277.
  • Reinhart, C. M. (2002). The Modern History of Sovereign Debt Crises. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 29-50.
← Prev Next →