Muslim World Report

The Impact of Edward Coristine's Resignation on U.S. Governance

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 25, 2025 10:51 AM | 8 min read | 1679 words

TL;DR: Edward Coristine’s resignation from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) poses significant concerns for U.S. governance. The potential for political instability and a decline in public trust looms large as the administration’s efficiency reforms face challenges. This resignation may trigger widespread departures and jeopardize crucial governance initiatives.

The Resignation of Edward ‘Big Balls’ Coristine: Unraveling Implications for U.S. Governance

Edward Coristine, informally dubbed ‘Big Balls,’ has abruptly resigned from his position at the U.S. government’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), just a month after being converted to full-time status. This departure, confirmed by a White House official, has sparked considerable debate about the stability and effectiveness of DOGE—an agency designed to streamline government operations during a time when public trust in the federal system is increasingly fragile. The timing of Coristine’s resignation comes at a critical juncture, with trust in governmental institutions at an all-time low due to a combination of political polarization, economic uncertainty, and persistent social issues.

Context of Coristine’s Tenure

Coristine’s brief tenure is marked by his involvement in contentious discussions, including:

  • Immigration policies linked to the controversial golden visa initiative, which has faced scrutiny since its inception.
  • His inability to clear the probationary period, suggesting deeper issues within DOGE.

Additionally, the recent withdrawal of Elon Musk from the initiative has cast a shadow over the agency’s credibility. This resignation raises alarms not only about potential instability within DOGE but also about the administration’s broader agenda, which critics argue remains mired in the very inefficiencies it was established to eliminate.

The implications of Coristine’s resignation extend beyond bureaucratic changes; they reflect a broader narrative of distrust and disillusionment among the public toward government institutions. As the Biden administration struggles to fulfill its promises of effective governance, this incident could exacerbate existing criticisms. Stakeholders—including political opponents, advocacy groups, and the public—may interpret this resignation as further evidence of a government losing its grip at a crucial moment for American democracy. The ongoing fallout may also affect international perceptions of U.S. governance, as both allies and adversaries watch for signs of instability that could impact U.S. foreign policy and international relations.

What If Coristine’s Resignation Sparks a Wave of Departures?

Should Edward Coristine’s departure from DOGE signal the beginning of a wider wave of resignations within the agency or even across the government, the consequences could be profound. A mass exodus of staff, particularly in roles vital to implementing government efficiency and immigration policies, risks significant delays in key projects central to the Biden administration’s agenda. Such a scenario would not only exacerbate existing inefficiencies but also entrench public skepticism toward the government’s capacity to govern effectively.

The absence of strong leadership within DOGE could:

  • Paralyze efforts to reform immigration processes.
  • Impair departmental functionality.

This perceived paralysis in governance can create fertile ground for anti-establishment movements that may not align with the interests of marginalized communities, particularly Muslims and other minorities who have historically faced disproportionate challenges within existing systems (Johnston & Romzek, 1999). The growing sentiment that the government is ineffective may embolden extremist factions to capitalize on public frustration, further complicating the already tenuous political atmosphere.

Internationally, a perceived crisis in U.S. governance could weaken America’s standing on the world stage. Allies may reconsider collaborations with the U.S. on shared initiatives, fearing that uncertainty within the U.S. government could hinder collective efforts on critical issues like climate change and security. Adversaries, sensing opportunity, might exploit these vulnerabilities, emboldening regional strategies that counter U.S. interests. The geopolitical repercussions of this scenario could extend far beyond American borders, undermining longstanding alliances and fostering instability in various global hotspots.

What If the DOGE Reforms Are Abandoned Altogether?

If Coristine’s resignation results in a significant restructuring or outright abandonment of DOGE’s reform agenda, the ramifications for governance and public trust could be disastrous. Established to enhance government productivity and responsiveness, DOGE was formed in response to years of criticism regarding bureaucratic inefficiency.

Potential Consequences Include:

  • Invalidating the efforts made thus far.
  • Bolstering the narrative that the government is incapable of meaningful change.

As Romzek (2000) highlights, the challenges of implementation and accountability in public governance are often exacerbated by shifts in leadership and structural changes. In this scenario, public trust in governmental institutions would likely diminish further, as disillusioned citizens perceive their officials as either inept or indifferent to the needs of the people. Communities reliant on effective governance to address socio-economic inequalities—especially Muslim communities, which face unique challenges related to immigration policy and civil rights—would find themselves increasingly alienated. The ripple effects could lead to heightened activism and resistance, as citizens demand accountability and transparency, potentially galvanizing a wider coalition of marginalized groups against governmental failures (Dietz, Ostrom, & Stern, 2003).

Moreover, the abandonment of efficiency reforms could embolden right-wing anti-immigration sentiments that have gained traction in various political landscapes. Without a functional DOGE focused on inclusive policies, a vacuum could form that far-right factions would eagerly attempt to fill, promoting regressive agendas that threaten the welfare of minorities. On a broader scale, failing to implement efficiency reforms could undermine the U.S.’s ability to respond to crises—such as public health emergencies or climate change—exacerbating existing vulnerabilities and eroding governmental efficacy.

What If the Administration Seizes This Opportunity for Restructuring?

Should the Biden administration choose to view Coristine’s resignation as an opportunity to rethink its approach to governance and efficiency, the potential outcomes could be transformative. A strategic reorganization could serve as a reset button, allowing the government to reassess its priorities while fostering innovation in service delivery.

An Ideal Response Could Include:

  • Leveraging this crisis as a catalyst for growth.
  • Committing to transparent governance and actively engaging with stakeholder communities, including Muslims and other marginalized groups.

By adopting a more inclusive approach that actively integrates diverse voices, the administration could pave the way for more effective policymaking. Such a strategic reorganization could solidify the administration’s commitment to reforming immigration policy and other critical initiatives. By showcasing a renewed dedication to inclusive governance, the Biden administration could potentially rally public support, not just among its base but also from disaffected citizens who yearn for a more responsive government. This would not only help mitigate the fallout from Coristine’s resignation but could also serve to re-establish the U.S. as a model of efficient governance in the global arena, thereby restoring some degree of faith in the federal system.

Strategic Maneuvers for Key Players

As we reflect on the implications of Coristine’s resignation, various stakeholders must consider strategic actions to navigate this turbulent political landscape effectively.

Biden Administration

For the Biden administration, a focus on transparency is essential. Establishing clear lines of communication about reforms and future initiatives could be vital in rebuilding public trust. Furthermore, reaching out to advocacy groups and communities—including feedback from Muslim organizations—could enhance understanding and cooperation, ultimately leading to more effective policies. Actively engaging with civil society stakeholders can create avenues for collaborative governance that prioritize the needs of all citizens, particularly marginalized groups that often fall through the cracks in policy discussions.

Congress

For Congress, there exists an opportunity to actively scrutinize the functioning of DOGE. Lawmakers from both parties should engage in bipartisan efforts to ensure that the department remains committed to its mission of efficiency while promoting effective immigration policies. This could involve:

  • Holding hearings to provide oversight on the agency’s progress.
  • Ensuring that any appointments are made transparently and with public input.

Congressional oversight can serve as a powerful tool to hold the executive branch accountable, ensuring that the principles of democracy and representation are upheld.

Civil Society Organizations

Civil society organizations have a critical role to play in advocating for marginalized communities during this period of uncertainty. By pushing for policies that promote inclusivity, particularly concerning immigration, these groups could help shift the narrative away from systemic inefficiency toward constructive engagement that values diversity. Organizations must leverage this moment to galvanize public support for effective governance reforms that address the unique needs of all Americans, thereby fostering a more equitable society.

Public Engagement

Finally, for the general public, vigilance and active participation in the democratic process are more crucial than ever. Engaging with representatives, participating in town halls, and demanding accountability will be vital as the political landscape evolves. The potential for transformative change exists, but it hinges on the commitment of all stakeholders to challenge the status quo and advocate for a government that genuinely serves its people. By fostering a climate of civic engagement, citizens can ensure that their voices are heard and that their demands for effective governance resonate through the halls of power.

Conclusion

The circumstances surrounding Edward ‘Big Balls’ Coristine’s resignation may be just the beginning of a much-needed reckoning in U.S. governance.

References

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907-1912.
  • Gulati, A. (1995). The Role of Civil Society in a Democracy. Tocqueville Review, 16(1), 91-106.
  • Inglehart, R., Norris, P., & Welzel, C. (2000). Gender Equality and Democracy. Comparative Sociology, 9(3-4), 283-319.
  • Johnston, J. & Romzek, B. S. (1999). The Challenge of Accountability in Networked Organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 29(4), 394-415.
  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and Explicit CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424.
  • Moon, M. J., & Ingraham, P. W. (1998). The Role of Organizational Theory in the Study of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 58(6), 495-505.
  • Orren, K. (1998). Trust and Distrust in Government. Political Psychology, 19(4), 639-655.
  • Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
  • Romzek, B. S. (2000). Dynamics of Public Accountability in an Era of Reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(4), 621-639.
  • Rosenbaum, J. (2010). The Influence of Civil Society on U.S. Governance. Political Science Quarterly, 125(4), 563-590.
  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2016). Theoretical Approaches to Governance Networks. Public Management Review, 18(7), 1037-1054.
  • Whitfield, S., Lema, D., & Elhawary, S. (2009). The Role of Civil Society in Governance and Development. Development Studies Review, 15(3), 35-51.
← Prev Next →