Muslim World Report

**Elderly Couple's Suicide Highlights Cybercrime Crisis in India**

**Dr. Anthony Lindsay** | Mar 30, 2025 9:20 AM | 7 min read | 1380 words

TL;DR: A tragic case in Karnataka reveals the severity of cybercrime impacting the elderly, highlighting the urgent need for improved cybersecurity measures to protect vulnerable populations in India. The consequences of inaction can lead to significant financial and social repercussions, urging government, civil society, and individuals to advocate for systemic change.

The Hidden Cost of Cybercrime: A Call for Action

In early October 2023, a tragic incident in Belagavi district, Karnataka, illuminated the devastating realities of cybercrime in India. An elderly couple, Diyango Najarat (83) and Playviana Najarat (79), took their own lives after falling victim to a cyber fraud scheme that siphoned off ₹50 lakh from their life savings. The perpetrators, posing as officials from the Delhi Crime Branch, instilled a paralyzing fear of legal repercussions alongside the loss of their money. The couple left behind a suicide note that expressed their profound despair and hopelessness—a heartbreaking testament to the impact that unchecked cybercrime can have on the most vulnerable members of society.

This incident is not merely a personal tragedy; it resonates throughout the broader societal context, underscoring an epidemic of cyber fraud that is wreaking havoc on India, particularly among senior citizens. As noted by Roberts et al. (2012), the fear of identity theft and its associated fraud has become comparable to traditional crimes, compelling individuals to limit their online interactions. This demographic often lacks the technological literacy necessary to navigate the increasingly complex digital landscape. The government has faced mounting criticism for its inaction in addressing this escalating crisis, while advocacy groups have long called for enhanced policies and protective measures that prioritize public safety.

The Price of Inaction

The implications of the Najarat couple’s tragic demise extend far beyond individual loss. They indicate systemic failures within India’s governance structures and highlight a glaring need for comprehensive cybersecurity reforms, effective law enforcement strategies, and public education campaigns aimed at safeguarding citizens against an ever-growing tide of digital deception. Key considerations include:

  • Evolving Cybersecurity Measures: As highlighted by Denning et al. (2013), cybersecurity must evolve in tandem with increasingly sophisticated cyber threats.
  • Impact on Vulnerable Populations: Without protective measures, the elderly and those with low digital literacy are at greater risk of victimization, as noted by Pratt et al. (2013).
  • Economic Consequences: Fear could lead to a significant decline in online engagement, which would stunt the growth of digital economies, as emphasized by Roberts et al. (2012).

If the Indian government maintains its current trajectory of inaction, the consequences will be dire. The rising incidence of cyber fraud is likely to result in escalating financial losses and personal tragedies akin to that of the Najarat couple. Vulnerable populations will become increasingly susceptible to scams without protective measures from the state. Additionally, the perception of insecurity may curtail digital economic participation, with citizens hesitating to engage in online transactions.

A broader view shows that neglecting these pressing issues could embolden cybercriminals, complicating efforts to combat fraud and leading to potential social unrest. Individuals who feel abandoned by the government may be more susceptible to radicalization or engage in anti-social behavior (Maimon & Louderback, 2018; Whitty, 2019).

What If the Government Fails to Act?

Imagining a scenario where the Indian government maintains its current inaction, the ramifications are harrowing. Key concerns include:

  • Financial and Psychological Consequences: The rising instances of cyber fraud are likely to lead to severe consequences for victims and their families.
  • Economic Stagnation: Citizens may retract from online interactions, undermining businesses that rely on digital platforms.
  • Damaged International Reputation: Continued inaction could deter foreign direct investment (FDI), crippling economic growth.

Moreover, emboldened cybercriminals may escalate their activities, complicating government efforts to combat cybercrime. The perception among these criminals that the government is impotent may lead to increasingly sophisticated and damaging attacks.

What If Cybersecurity Measures Are Implemented?

Conversely, the active implementation of robust cybersecurity measures could transform the landscape of digital safety in India. Potential initiatives include:

  • Establishment of Cybersecurity Agencies: Independent bodies tasked with monitoring emerging threats and addressing vulnerabilities could dramatically improve responses to cyber threats.
  • Public Awareness Campaigns: Educating citizens about scams and protective practices could empower individuals, especially the elderly, to safeguard themselves against fraud.

Internationally, India’s assertive stance on cybersecurity can enhance its image as a secure destination for foreign investment and collaboration. By establishing itself as a leader in cybersecurity, India could attract global technology firms, fostering economic growth and innovation.

What If Civil Society Demands Accountability?

Civil society organizations and community activists can play an essential role in demanding accountability from governmental entities. Key actions include:

  • Advocacy for Stringent Laws: Civic engagement can pressure the government to draft legislation that imposes harsher penalties for cybercriminals.
  • Public Discourse and Awareness: Mobilization can stimulate public discourse around digital safety, ensuring that cybersecurity remains a priority.

Imagining a future where civil society rallies for enhanced cybersecurity, the collective strength of activism could lead to substantial policy changes. Community workshops focused on digital safety could empower seniors and other vulnerable groups with the necessary skills to navigate the digital landscape effectively.

The Broader Implications of Cybercrime

The ramifications of cybercrime extend beyond individual tragedies, presenting profound challenges to societal structures and governance. The emotional distress from cyber fraud can ripple through families and communities, affecting mental health and community cohesion. The psychological toll of victimization can lead to:

  • Increased Anxiety: Victims and their families may experience emotional distress and lower self-esteem.
  • Strain on Public Resources: Law enforcement agencies may be stretched thin, diverting attention and funding away from pressing societal needs.

Moreover, systemic issues within governance structures may complicate efforts to combat cybercrime. The inability to address rising cyber threats can signify deeper governance failures, leading to a crisis of legitimacy for political authorities. Citizens may grow indifferent or hostile toward governmental institutions, reducing civic engagement.

A Future of Cybersecurity Transformation

The landscape of cybersecurity in India is at a crucial crossroads. With increasing incidents of cyber fraud, the response from governmental entities and civil society will determine the future of digital safety within the nation. Should the Indian government choose to act decisively, the prospects for a safer, more secure digital environment look promising. Conversely, if the current trajectory of inaction persists, the consequences could be catastrophic.

Ultimately, the collective responsibility lies with all stakeholders involved—government, civil society, private sector, and individuals—to advocate for and implement comprehensive strategies that address the growing threat of cybercrime. The urgency for systemic change has never been more pronounced, and proactive measures can pave the way for a brighter, safer digital future for all citizens.

References

  • Chan, S., van Asselt, H., Hale, T., Abbott, K. W., Beisheim, M., Hoffmann, M. J., & Guy, B. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: A comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6(1), 1-13.
  • Denning, T., Kohno, T., & Levy, H. M. (2013). Computer security and the modern home. Communications of the ACM, 56(7), 28-30.
  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Wang, Y., Abdallah Alalwan, A., Ahn, S. J., Balakrishnan, J., … & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2022). Metaverse marketing: How the metaverse will shape the future of consumer research and practice. Psychology and Marketing, 39(3), 453-467.
  • Goel, S., Williams, K. M., & Dincelli, E. (2017). Got Phished? Internet security and human vulnerability. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(1), 1-24.
  • Jung, J., & Melguizo, Á. (2022). Rules, institutions, or both? Estimating the drivers of telecommunication investment in Latin America. Journal of Cyber Policy, 7(1), 1-22.
  • Levi, M. (2008). Suite Revenge?: The shaping of folk devils and moral panics about white-collar crimes. The British Journal of Criminology, 49(1), 48-67.
  • Maimon, D., & Louderback, E. R. (2018). Cyber-dependent crimes: An interdisciplinary review. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 147-171.
  • McGarvey, N., Goetz, A. M., Gaventa, J., Cornwall, A., Crook, R., … & Stoker, G. (2001). Bringing citizen voice and client focus into service delivery. Unknown Journal.
  • Pratt, T. C., Turanovic, J. J., Fox, K. A., & Wright, K. A. (2013). Self-control and victimization: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 51(1), 37-67.
  • Roberts, L. D., Indermaur, D., & Spiranovic, C. (2012). Fear of cyber-identity theft and related fraudulent activity. Psychiatry Psychology and Law, 19(5), 637-650.
  • Tan, Y. (2012). Transparency without democracy: The unexpected effects of China’s environmental disclosure policy. Governance, 25(3), 415-436.
  • Whitty, M. T. (2019). Predicting susceptibility to cyber-fraud victimhood. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(4), 971-985.
← Prev Next →