Muslim World Report

U.S. Diplomats Directed to Skip Vietnam War Anniversary Events

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 23, 2025 9:30 PM | 6 min read | 1213 words

TL;DR: The U.S. State Department’s recent directive for diplomats to skip Vietnam War anniversary events raises concerns about the future of U.S.-Vietnam relations. This move could be interpreted as dismissive of the historical context of the Vietnam War, potentially reigniting tensions and complicating partnerships in Southeast Asia. A recalibration of diplomatic strategies is essential to maintain relationships built on respect and mutual understanding.

Editorial: The Implications of U.S. Diplomatic Disengagement in Vietnam

The recent directive from the U.S. State Department advising diplomats to skip events commemorating the anniversary of the Vietnam War sends a troubling signal about the current trajectory of American foreign policy. As the 100th day of President Trump’s second term approaches on April 30, 2025, this avoidance of significant historical commemorations raises serious concerns regarding the U.S. commitment to its international relationships. The Vietnam War remains a deeply emotional chapter for both nations, filled with memories of conflict, loss, and the potential for reconciliation (Dueck, 2011).

The Risks of Diplomatic Withdrawal

This directive could indicate a troubling regression in U.S.-Vietnam relations, jeopardizing years of painstaking progress. The implications extend far beyond Vietnam:

  • Perception of Dismissiveness: Skipping the anniversary may be viewed as neglecting the sacrifices made by the Vietnamese people, potentially reigniting historical grievances.
  • Criticism of U.S. Foreign Policy: Critics argue that this reflects a broader trend where domestic political calculations overshadow the complexities of international relations (Porter, 2018).

What If Vietnam Reassesses Its Diplomatic Relations with the U.S.?

What if Vietnam decides to reassess its diplomatic relations with the United States in light of this directive? Such a reassessment could fundamentally alter U.S.-Vietnam relations, given the sensitive historical context:

  • Partnership at Risk: Vietnam has worked diligently to forge a partnership characterized by mutual respect. A disregard for the war’s historical significance could be perceived as a breach of that respect (Elliott et al., 2011).
  • Potential Shift Towards China: If Vietnam distances itself from the U.S., it may strengthen ties with China, which could counterbalance U.S. interests in the region (Malhotra, 2012).
  • Impact on Domestic Sentiment: The young population in Vietnam may view the U.S. stance as dismissive, leading to increased pressures for a nationalist agenda that prioritizes sovereignty and historical grievances (Goldgeier & McFaul, 1992).

The Ripple Effects in Southeast Asia

The ramifications of such a pivot could reverberate throughout Southeast Asia:

  • Regional Reassessment: Countries like Cambodia and Laos, historically tied to the U.S., might reconsider their own positions, leading to a broader regional reordering (Gordon, 1998).
  • Emergence of a Regional Bloc: A shift towards stronger ties with non-Western powers could complicate U.S. efforts to maintain influence in a critical strategic region.

What If the U.S. Faces Domestic Backlash for Its Decision?

What if the U.S. government faces significant domestic backlash as a result of this decision? The reaction may include:

  • Mobilization of Veterans and Advocacy Groups: Concerns regarding the management of historical context may lead to public dissent, questioning the State Department’s judgment (McMahon, 2002).
  • Need for Reassessment: This backlash might compel the U.S. government to reconsider its diplomatic posture, possibly leading to renewed engagement and public statements about historical reconciliation (Althaus, 2002).

Response to Domestic Criticism

Domestic criticism could prompt deeper discussions about the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy:

  • Historical Amnesia: A national dialogue on the consequences of ignoring historical injustices may emerge, fostering scrutiny of U.S. actions abroad (Rynhold & Waxman, 2008).
  • Cycle of Reaction: Conversely, overwhelming criticism might lead to more aggressive stances abroad, escalating tensions and complicating bilateral relations.

What If Other Countries React to U.S. Disengagement?

What if other countries in the region interpret this directive as a signal to align their diplomatic strategies against U.S. interests?

  • Cautionary Tales for Southeast Asia: Vietnam’s experience may serve as a cautionary tale for its neighbors, prompting them to reassess their own diplomatic stances (Gordon, 1998).
  • Strengthening Non-Western Ties: Countries may take this as an opportunity to strengthen ties with China and Russia, altering the balance of power in Southeast Asia (Shambaugh, 2005).

The Broader Context of the U.S.-Vietnam Relationship

The fallout from this decision underscores the need for the U.S. to reconsider its diplomatic engagement strategies. The U.S.-Vietnam relationship, built on years of negotiation, stands at a crucial juncture:

  • Mutual Economic Interests: Both nations have transitioned from hostility to cooperation, focusing on shared economic interests and security concerns.
  • Sensitivity to Historical Legacies: The Vietnam War evokes strong emotions, and dismissing its significance could be seen as disregard for the suffering endured on both sides (Althaus, 2002).

What Can Be Done?

Strategic Maneuvers for the U.S.

  • Engage in Sincere Dialogue: The U.S. should recognize the historical significance of the Vietnam War by sending senior diplomats to anniversary events or issuing public commemorative statements (Miller & Kagan, 1997).
  • Foster Educational Exchanges: Initiating programs focused on history and reconciliation could help combat anti-American sentiment while promoting mutual understanding.
  • Clarification from the U.S.: Vietnam should seek clarification on U.S. intentions, maintaining open diplomatic channels for constructive discussions.
  • Strategic Balancing: As Vietnam navigates its international relations, it must avoid over-dependence on U.S. support.

Regional Cooperation

  • Collective Response: Southeast Asian countries could form coalitions to address shared concerns about U.S. engagements, ensuring that their voices are heard in shaping regional policies.

Conclusion

The complexities of U.S.-Vietnam relations, intertwined with historical legacies and contemporary geopolitics, highlight the delicate nature of international diplomacy. Each decision made by the U.S. has far-reaching consequences, affecting regional stability and global perceptions of U.S. leadership. Moving forward, a collaborative approach grounded in historical understanding and mutual respect will be crucial for navigating the challenges of an increasingly multipolar world.

References

  • Althaus, C. (2002). Framing the Vietnam War: The Politics of Commemoration and Memory. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 13(4), 1-22.
  • Barkawi, T. (2016). The Imperial Logic of War. Review of International Studies, 42(2), 345-369.
  • Dueck, C. (2011). Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton University Press.
  • Elliott, B., et al. (2011). The Politics of Cloudy Waters: U.S.-Vietnam Relations in the 21st Century. Asian Survey, 51(2), 368-389.
  • Elmwood, W. (2005). Vietnam and the Challenges of Postwar Diplomacy: 1995-2005. Asian Policy Review, 2(1), 59-78.
  • Goldgeier, J. & McFaul, M. (1992). Ukraine and Russia: Towards an Uneasy Partnership. Foreign Affairs, 71(2), 36-55.
  • Gordon, M. R. (1998). The New Asia: Vietnam’s Growing Relations with the U.S. and Its Implications. Journal of International Affairs, 52(2), 217-243.
  • Kämmen, D. & Irwin-Zarecka, I. (1995). The Politics of Memory: The Vietnam War and Its Aftermath. The American Historical Review, 100(4), 1003-1017.
  • Koh, H. H., et al. (1997). The Future of U.S.-Vietnam Relations: A New Era of Cooperation. Harvard International Review, 19(3), 24-29.
  • Lim, A. & Cooper, Z. (2015). China’s Influence in Southeast Asia: Implications for U.S.-Vietnam Relations. Asia Pacific Issues, 121, 1-6.
  • Malhotra, S. (2012). The South China Sea: A New Stage of Competition between China and the U.S. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(6), 845-873.
  • Miller, S. & Kagan, F. (1997). Vietnam: The Unseen War: Pictures from the Other Side. The American Spectator, 30(3), 28-34.
  • Porter, P. (2018). The American Way of War: How the U.S. Uses Military Force. Routledge.
  • Rynhold, J. & Waxman, D. (2008). The Legacy of Vietnam in U.S. Foreign Policy. The Washington Quarterly, 31(3), 55-69.
  • Shambaugh, D. (2005). The United States and China: A New Model of Great Power Relations? The Washington Quarterly, 28(3), 17-22.
← Prev Next →