Muslim World Report

Infosys Lays Off Trainees After Failures in Skills Assessments

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 30, 2025 2:09 PM | 11 min read | 2176 words

TL;DR: Infosys has laid off numerous trainees due to failures in skills assessments, revealing a significant skills gap among graduates. This situation calls for urgent reforms in education and training programs to better prepare individuals for the workforce.

The Crisis of Competence: A Call for Reform in Education and Employment

In today’s rapidly evolving job market, the gap between educational attainment and practical skills has never been more glaring. This situation has reached a critical juncture, particularly for graduates who enter the workforce inadequately prepared for the demands of their chosen fields. For instance, a 2021 survey by the National Association of Colleges and Employers found that nearly 60% of employers reported difficulties in finding candidates with the necessary skills for their roles. This troubling statistic illuminates a stark reality: many graduates lack the essential skills required to succeed. It prompts us to consider: Are we equipping our future workforce with the tools they need, or are we merely filling seats in classrooms? The effectiveness of our educational systems is under scrutiny, raising critical questions about the roles and responsibilities of both educational institutions and employers in bridging this widening gap.

The Reality of Graduate Preparedness

During a recent series of hiring events in April 2025, we encountered numerous candidates whose credentials belied their capabilities. Despite holding degrees, many exhibited a shocking lack of fundamental knowledge in areas such as:

  • Programming
  • Computer systems

It was evident that some had never even written a line of code or engaged with foundational texts in their discipline. Beyond technical skills, a significant number of candidates also struggled with basic communication and English proficiency—soft skills that are indispensable in any workplace (Durlak & DuPre, 2008).

This scenario mirrors the plight of the Apollo 13 mission in 1970, where engineers faced a life-or-death situation with incomplete information and inadequate preparation. Just as the astronauts needed the right tools and knowledge to survive, today’s job seekers must possess not only theoretical knowledge but also the practical skills essential for their roles.

Faced with the stark reality of their preparedness, rather than acknowledging the need for improvement, many candidates resorted to personal appeals, citing family challenges and hardships. While compassion for individuals facing difficulties is important, the harsh truth remains: an open interview should be a sufficient opportunity for any candidate to demonstrate their capabilities. Anything beyond that risks placing the employer’s professional credibility on the line.

This raises the question: What if educational institutions were structured to not simply issue degrees but to ensure that their graduates were genuinely job-ready upon graduation? How would this shift reshape the workforce and the future of industry standards?

Accountability in Education

Critics may hastily point fingers at the education system for granting diplomas to unprepared individuals, but this view oversimplifies the problem. One must ponder how it is possible to spend four years in college and emerge without a basic competency in one’s field. The reality is disheartening; educational institutions that are supposed to prepare students for the workforce are failing them.

This failure is compounded when companies invest in training programs only to find that candidates still struggle to meet even the most basic performance metrics. The situation has reached a point where companies, in response to the saturation of the job market and advancements in technology, are less willing to provide multiple chances for trainees to succeed. For instance, we have seen an alarming trend where over 800 trainees have failed assessments since February 2025 alone (Lichman, 2016).

To illustrate, consider the automotive industry during the 1980s, which faced a wave of criticism for producing vehicles that underperformed. In response, manufacturers shifted their focus to quality control and training, investing heavily to ensure their employees were competent and equipped for the demands of the market. This kind of commitment is notably absent in the educational sector today, raising the question: What will it take for our institutions to prioritize genuine preparedness over mere graduation rates?

The Role of Technology

The current reliance on advanced learning models (LLMs) that can produce comparable, if not superior, code quality to that of inexperienced trainees exacerbates this issue. Imagine if we lived in an era akin to the Industrial Revolution, where innovations like the steam engine transformed the workforce and redefined skills. What if employers leveraged these advanced technologies not just to fill positions but to redefine what qualifies as a competent candidate? Just as skilled craftsmen adapted to new machinery, today’s workers must learn to engage meaningfully with these emerging technologies, becoming invaluable assets in a rapidly evolving landscape. As these technologies continue to evolve, the ability to harness them effectively will separate the merely competent from the truly exceptional.

Impact of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified these challenges. The abrupt shift to online learning highlighted existing inadequacies within educational frameworks (García‐Peñalvo & Corell, 2020). The traditional models of education were forced to adapt, but many did so inadequately. We must ask ourselves, What if educational institutions had embraced this disruption as an opportunity to innovate, rather than merely adjusting their methods? Consider the historical example of the Industrial Revolution, which transformed industries and education alike; the pivotal shift then was met with a zeal for innovation that redefined societal structures. Reflecting on these past two years indicates that a more proactive approach could have prepared students more effectively for the realities of a digital-first world. Just as the introduction of the printing press revolutionized education in the 15th century, providing access to information previously reserved for the elite, the current digital landscape offers unprecedented opportunities for learning that require visionary thinking and adaptation.

Personal Responsibility and Employer Actions

As we delve deeper into this crisis, it is imperative that trainees take ownership of their professional development. Focusing on enhancing their skills and competencies is not merely a personal responsibility; it’s essential for driving up starting salaries and employment quality in regions such as India, where entry-level positions often offer unreasonably low compensation—averaging around 3.5 lakh per annum (Murtaza, 2019). This scenario is reminiscent of the early 20th century in the United States, when industrial workers faced similarly stagnant wages until they began advocating for better training and labor practices, ultimately leading to improved working conditions and salaries. However, this responsibility should not rest solely on the shoulders of candidates. Employers must also reconsider their hiring practices and training programs to create a more effective pipeline for skilled labor.

In doing so, we face another pressing question: What if employers prioritized the cultivation of a workforce equipped not just with technical skills but also with soft skills essential for overall organizational success? Just as a well-tended garden yields a bountiful harvest, a collaborative approach that bridges the gap between education and employment is necessary to foster an environment where skill development is prioritized. This would ensure that graduates are not merely degree-holders but capable professionals ready to contribute meaningfully to their fields, much like a well-rounded athlete who excels not just in physical strength but also in strategy and teamwork.

Systemic Reform in Education

The crisis of competence extends beyond individual institutions or sectors; it speaks to a larger systemic issue present in many educational frameworks worldwide. One must ponder whether degrees have become a default expectation rather than a reflection of true capability. What if we reimagined education to place greater emphasis on demonstrable skills and competencies, rather than the accumulation of credits? Just as the ancient Greeks valued practical knowledge and skills in their educational pursuits, emphasizing rhetoric and civic engagement, we too must reconsider what constitutes an educated individual in our modern society.

The need for systemic reform cannot be overstated. Educational institutions must adapt, integrating more practical experiences and solidifying connections with industries that reflect the evolving job market (Kruk et al., 2018). This transformation requires a paradigm shift—moving from rote learning and theoretical frameworks to hands-on, experiential education that mirrors real-world challenges and contexts. Could we envision a future where graduates are not merely holders of degrees, but adept problem solvers, ready to tackle the complexities of the workforce? The shift in focus could lead to a generation more equipped to innovate, create, and respond to the demands of society.

Partnerships for Success

Moreover, we must consider if there is a way to better align the interests of educational institutions with those of employers. What if partnerships between universities and corporations could be structured to create a continuous feedback loop that refines curricula to better meet employer needs? Just as the assembly line revolutionized manufacturing in the early 20th century by streamlining processes, these collaborations could ensure that courses evolve alongside technological advancements and labor market demands, resulting in graduates who possess both the hard and soft skills necessary for success.

The responsibility lies not only with the candidates but also with educational institutions and employers to foster an environment where skill development is prioritized. We must advocate for a collaborative approach to bridge the storied gap between education and employment. What if educational institutions operated more like incubators for talent, actively engaging with industries to ensure their graduates are equipped for the complexities of modern workplaces? Just as startups thrive through mentorship and resources provided by established companies, so too could our future workforce flourish when educational paths are closely aligned with the realities of the job market. Are we ready to rethink the role of education in preparing individuals for a rapidly changing world?

Reevaluating Competence Metrics

In light of these challenges and possibilities, it’s essential to scrutinize the metrics by which we define competence. Current assessment methods often fall short in identifying candidates’ true potential. What if we moved towards more holistic evaluation frameworks that considered practical experiences, problem-solving abilities, and interpersonal skills alongside academic achievements? Historically, the industrial age relied heavily on standardized testing and rote memorization to determine aptitude, yet many successful leaders, from Thomas Edison to Steve Jobs, thrived despite conventional metrics failing to recognize their unique talents. This shift towards a more comprehensive evaluation might not only reveal hidden potentials but could also herald a new era of workforce readiness and professional achievement. Are we prepared to redefine what competence truly means in the 21st century?

Recognizing Inclusivity Challenges

Finally, we must recognize the multifaceted nature of this issue. As we navigate through the crisis of competence, it is imperative that all stakeholders recognize their roles in effecting meaningful reform. What if this crisis could be reframed as an opportunity—an impetus for nurturing an educational ecosystem that not only prepares individuals for jobs but empowers them to innovate and lead in their professions?

In pursuing these solutions, we also face challenges related to inclusivity. Disparities in access to educational resources, particularly in underserved communities, continue to exacerbate the skills gap. Consider the example of the GI Bill in the post-World War II era, which dramatically increased access to education for millions of veterans and helped to build a prosperous middle class. What if equitable access to quality education and training were prioritized, ensuring that every individual has the opportunity to succeed regardless of their background? Like planting seeds in fertile soil, fostering an inclusive approach to education could dramatically reshape the capabilities of the workforce while also enhancing overall economic vitality.

Conclusion

The time for stakeholders—educators, employers, policymakers, and learners alike—to innovate and collaborate is now. The pressing realities of our labor market demand immediate and comprehensive reform. Much like the Industrial Revolution sparked a fundamental transformation in labor practices and educational needs, today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape requires us to rethink our approach to education and workforce training. The disconnect between education and employability must be addressed through concerted efforts from all stakeholders involved. Just as factories once adapted their training programs to prepare workers for new machinery, we must ensure that our educational systems equip learners with relevant skills. Only by doing so can we hope to cultivate a workforce that is not only educated but genuinely skilled, capable of addressing the challenges of an increasingly complex global economy.

References:

  • Azorín Abellán, C. M. (2020). Beyond COVID-19 supernova. Is another education coming?. Journal of Professional Capital and Community. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-05-2020-0019
  • Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. M. (2008). Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
  • García‐Peñalvo, F. J., & Corell, A. (2020). The COVID-19: the enzyme of the digital transformation of teaching or the reflection of a methodological and competence crisis in higher education?. Campus Virtuales.
  • Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., et al. (2018). High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. The Lancet Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30386-3
  • Lichman, L. Y. (2016). Crisis of competence: some aspects of language education in meta-historical environment. Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University Series Pedagogy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.32342/2522-4115-2016-0-12-228-232
  • Mansfield, B. (2004). Competence in transition. Journal of European Industrial Training. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590410527672
  • Ten Cate, O., et al. (2021). Questioning medical competence: Should the Covid-19 crisis affect the goals of medical education?. Medical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2021.1928619
← Prev Next →