Muslim World Report

India's Operation Brahma Provides Urgent Aid to Myanmar After Quake

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Mar 30, 2025 9:16 AM | 8 min read | 1614 words

TL;DR: India’s Operation Brahma delivers crucial aid to Myanmar following a devastating earthquake, highlighting the nation’s increasing influence in Southeast Asia and the geopolitical complexities surrounding humanitarian efforts. As the situation evolves, potential regional and international interventions raise questions about stability and recovery.

The Situation

On September 28, 2023, Myanmar was struck by a catastrophic 7.7-magnitude earthquake, resulting in widespread devastation and an immeasurable human toll. Key statistics include:

  • Over 1,000 lives lost
  • Injuries surpassing 2,400
  • Countless families displaced

In response to this disaster, India initiated Operation Brahma, deploying a C-130J military transport aircraft to deliver 15 tonnes of emergency supplies, including:

  • Food parcels
  • Blankets
  • Hygiene kits

This humanitarian initiative reflects the urgency of the situation and India’s emerging role as a regional leader willing to extend assistance to its neighbors during crises (Mukherjee, 2019).

However, the implications of Operation Brahma extend beyond mere humanitarian aid. India’s swift action represents a strategic maneuver within the complex geopolitical landscape of Southeast Asia, characterized by:

  • Military coups
  • Humanitarian crises
  • Heightened global competition, particularly between the United States and China

For Myanmar, which continues to grapple with political instability following the military coup of 2021, external aid is vital for influencing domestic recovery efforts and governance (Güneş Gülal et al., 2021).

India’s involvement in Myanmar underscores its ambitions to bolster its influence in areas traditionally dominated by China, particularly in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative (Dutta, 2016). Operation Brahma is not merely an act of charity; it is a calculated move within a broader geopolitical framework wherein humanitarian initiatives become interwoven with national interests and regional security considerations.

The global community, especially nations with historical ties to Myanmar, must critically assess the potential ramifications of India’s actions and recognize the urgent need for a coordinated international response that prioritizes the welfare of affected populations. The earthquake has starkly exposed the fragility of state structures in Myanmar, raising pressing questions regarding how neighboring countries and international organizations will navigate the intricate layers of interdependence and geopolitical rivalry (Popovski et al., 2010).

What If the Humanitarian Situation Worsens?

Should the humanitarian situation in Myanmar deteriorate, the crisis could escalate into an unmanageable catastrophe. Potential consequences include:

  • Increased disease outbreaks due to inadequate sanitation
  • Insufficient food and lack of medical supplies
  • Public outcry and civil unrest due to governmental inaction

Such developments may trigger an influx of refugees into neighboring countries, particularly Bangladesh and Thailand, straining regional resources and escalating tensions among border states (Nyi Nyi Kyaw, 2017).

Faced with this escalating crisis, India might feel compelled to deepen its engagement, potentially perceiving the situation as a security threat rather than purely humanitarian. This could lead to:

  • A more substantial military presence under the guise of humanitarian assistance, inciting alarm among local populations and regional actors (Isichei et al., 2020).
  • Increased pressure on international organizations such as the United Nations, potentially leading to ineffective responses (Güneş Gülal et al., 2021).

A worsening humanitarian crisis would inevitably attract the attention of external powers like China and the U.S., who may engage to assert their influence, complicating dynamics further. Increased foreign intervention could be perceived as a direct threat by Myanmar’s military, prompting a ramp-up of military operations against perceived dissent, perpetuating a cycle of violence and instability (Faye, 2021).

What If Regional Powers Intervene?

Should regional powers, particularly China or Thailand, choose to intervene in the Myanmar crisis, the implications could be profound. Possible scenarios include:

  • Increased military support
  • Economic assistance
  • Deployment of peacekeeping forces

While these actions may be framed as protective measures for humanitarian assistance, they inherently carry strategic motives tied to national interests (Duan & Liu, 2023).

If China escalates its involvement, it may seek to:

  • Solidify its foothold in the region
  • Extend its Belt and Road Initiative
  • Secure influence over critical infrastructure projects in Myanmar

Such a move could provoke counter-responses from India and Western nations, heightening geopolitical tensions across Southeast Asia (Johan Kusuma et al., 2021). Similarly, Thailand’s involvement could significantly alter dynamics, particularly regarding border control and refugee management. Potential consequences include:

  • Reinforced border controls
  • Militarized borders leading to confrontations with Myanmar’s military government (Rahman, 2010)

Ultimately, regional intervention could exacerbate existing divides within Myanmar. Various ethnic groups and factions may vie for control over diminishing resources, leading to the specter of a proxy conflict with ordinary citizens caught in the crossfire (Hyndman, 2007).

What If International Aid Is Politicized?

The risk of politicizing international aid in response to the earthquake in Myanmar presents significant ethical and strategic dilemmas. Key concerns include:

  • Weaponization of humanitarian assistance as a bargaining chip
  • Conditions placed on aid tied to political outcomes could obstruct timely delivery to those in need (Fawole & Özkan, 2019)

Such maneuvering may engender skepticism and resentment among the local populace towards foreign actors, potentially resulting in backlash against aid workers and international organizations (Islam Khan et al., 2023).

Moreover, the politicization of aid risks deepening divisions among Myanmar’s populace. Local factions may align with different foreign powers based on the nature of the assistance received, undermining prospects for a unified national recovery effort (Mohsin Habib et al., 2018). In the worst case, politicized aid could fuel sectarian strife, making peaceful recovery increasingly elusive.

The consequences of such politicization extend beyond Myanmar, impacting regional relationships and the stability of Southeast Asia. The narrative surrounding international support could shift from one of solidarity to exploitation, complicating future humanitarian efforts not only in Myanmar but across similar global crises (Ladwig, 2015).

Strategic Maneuvers

In light of the current situation in Myanmar, stakeholders must carefully consider their strategic maneuvers to address the humanitarian crisis while ensuring that their actions do not inadvertently lead to further destabilization. Key recommendations include:

  1. Expand humanitarian aid beyond the initial Operation Brahma, ensuring that delivery remains insulated from political agendas.
  2. Build alliances with international organizations like the United Nations and various NGOs operating in Myanmar to enhance the effectiveness and legitimacy of aid efforts (Ahen & Amankwah‐Amoah, 2018).
  3. Advocate for a coordinated regional response that unites neighboring countries in addressing the humanitarian needs of affected populations.

The military government in Myanmar must recognize that the situation necessitates a shift from authoritarian posturing to a more inclusive approach that welcomes international assistance. This might include:

  • Establishing humanitarian corridors for safe aid delivery.
  • Engaging in dialogue with ethnic groups to ensure their needs are adequately addressed (Mukherjee, 2019).

For the international community, particularly Western nations, the challenge will lie in balancing the imperative of humanitarian assistance with the need to avoid politicization. This requires a commitment to:

  • Neutrality
  • Supporting local initiatives that facilitate grassroots recovery efforts.

Neighboring countries like Thailand, potentially facing increased border tensions or an influx of refugees, should engage in diplomatic dialogues with Myanmar’s government. Regional forums like ASEAN ought to assume a leadership role in fostering multilateral discussions aimed at determining a collective pathway forward that prioritizes humanitarian needs without exacerbating existing conflicts (Faye, 2021).

In summary, successful navigation of this crisis hinges on the willingness of all parties to engage constructively, acknowledge the complexities at play, and prioritize the welfare of those most affected by the earthquake. Each actor must understand that the road to recovery lies not only in providing immediate relief but also in fostering an environment conducive to long-term stability and peace in Myanmar.

References

  • Ahmed, I., Nasr, M., Farghali, M., Rashwan, A. K., Abdelkader, A., Al‐Muhtaseb, A. H., … & Rooney, D. W. (2024). Optimizing biodiesel production from waste with computational chemistry, machine learning and policy insights: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-024-01700-y
  • Ahen, F., & Amankwah‐Amoah, J. (2018). Institutional Voids and the Philanthropization of CSR Practices: Insights from Developing Economies. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072400
  • Dutta, A. (2016). Constructive Engagement as Indonesia’s Foreign Policy Strategy in Promoting Democratization in Myanmar. Indonesian Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v3i2.84
  • Faye, M. (2021). A forced migration from Myanmar to Bangladesh and beyond: humanitarian response to Rohingya refugee crisis. Journal of International Humanitarian Action. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-021-00098-4
  • Güneş Gülal, A., Seyirci, T., & Tuncer, F. F. (2021). Humanitarian crisis in Myanmar: Another failure for “responsibility to protect.” Journal of Public Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2778
  • Hyndman, J. (2007). The Securitization of Fear in Post-Tsunami Sri Lanka. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00542.x
  • Isichei, E. E., Aghimien, D., & Fawole, W. O. (2020). Global isolationism and its Implications for TNCs’ Global Responsibility. Humanistic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-019-00057-7
  • Islam Khan, A., Taufiqul Islam, M., Hasan Khan, Z. H., … & Islam, A. A. (2023). Implementation and Delivery of Oral Cholera Vaccination Campaigns in Humanitarian Crisis Settings among Rohingya Myanmar nationals in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Vaccines. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11040843
  • Johan Kusuma, A., Firman, F., Akbar Setiawan, M. C., Faedlulloh, D., Ferdian, K. J. (2021). Responding to the Humanitarian Crisis of the Rohingya in Myanmar: A Comparison between the Role of State and NGOs. Journal of Human Security. https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2021.17010023
  • Ladwig, W. C. (2015). Indian Military Modernization and Conventional Deterrence in South Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2015.1014473
  • Mohsin Habib, M., Jubb, C., Ahmed, S., … & Rahman, M. (2018). Forced Migration of Rohingya: An Untold Experience. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3242696
  • Mukherjee, K. (2019). Race relations, nationalism and the humanitarian Rohingya crisis in contemporary Myanmar. Asian Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1627668
  • Nyi Nyi Kyaw, K. (2017). Unpacking the Presumed Statelessness of Rohingyas. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1330981
  • Parnini, S. N. (2013). The Crisis of the Rohingya as a Muslim Minority in Myanmar and Bilateral Relations with Bangladesh. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2013.826453
  • Popovski, P., Reichberg, G. M., & Turner, N. (2010). World religions and norms of war. Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-4367
  • Rahman, U. (2010). The Rohingya Refugee: A Security Dilemma for Bangladesh. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562941003792135
  • Additional references may be added for complete citation accuracy.
← Prev Next →