Muslim World Report

National Park Service Faces Backlash Over Tubman Erasure

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 8, 2025 9:50 AM | 9 min read | 1779 words

TL;DR: The National Park Service’s revision of its Underground Railroad webpage, which removed references to Harriet Tubman, has sparked widespread outrage over historical erasure. This blog post examines the implications of such changes, advocating for the recognition of accurate historical narratives that include marginalized figures like Tubman. The discussion highlights the risks of sanitizing history and the importance of confronting uncomfortable truths to ensure a more just society.

Revising History: The National Park Service and the Erasure of Harriet Tubman

The recent revisions to the National Park Service’s Underground Railroad webpage have ignited a significant outcry across the United States, exposing the troubling lengths to which certain governmental entities will go to sanitize history. In a move that has drawn sharp criticism from historians, educators, and civil rights advocates, the webpage has removed key references to Harriet Tubman, one of the most pivotal figures in the abolitionist movement.

Instead of confronting the brutal realities of slavery and Tubman’s courageous efforts to help enslaved individuals escape to freedom, the revised text emphasizes American ideals of liberty, offering a sanitized version of history. This shift alters the narrative surrounding Tubman’s legacy and reflects a dangerous trend in historical revisionism that echoes throughout the current political climate. Critical race theorists argue that historical narratives are often manipulated to serve dominant ideological positions (Gillborn, 2006; Ladson-Billings, 1998).

The Broader National Discourse

This incident is emblematic of a broader national discourse regarding historical representation and the ongoing efforts to redefine narratives surrounding race, equity, and inclusion. The main concerns include:

  • Governing Institutions: Critics argue that the changes exemplify a growing tendency within governmental and educational institutions to gloss over the harsh truths of America’s past.
  • Obscured Realities: The National Park Service’s decision to prioritize a narrative aligning more closely with contemporary ideological preferences risks obscuring the realities of slavery and the profound struggles against it.
  • Legacy of Struggle: Tubman’s legacy is not merely one of freedom; it is intricately bound to the violent and oppressive systems that sought to dehumanize millions (McGee & Stovall, 2015; Campbell, 2004).

By editing out her contributions, the agency sends a troubling message about whose stories are deemed worthy of remembrance, reinforcing the idea that the struggle against oppression is now framed as “woke” or politically incorrect.

Implications of Historical Revision

The implications of this revision extend far beyond a single webpage. In an era marked by widening political and social divisions, how history is taught and remembered plays a crucial role in shaping national identity. The erasure of figures like Tubman from the historical narrative risks creating:

  • Homogenized Understandings: A homogenized and ultimately inaccurate understanding of America’s past.
  • Ignored Roots: Justifications for ignoring the roots of present-day systemic racism and inequality.

Without a clear understanding of how heroes like Tubman fought against systemic oppression, the lessons of resilience, courage, and accountability could be lost. A society that skims over the harsh truths of its history risks repeating them, perpetuating historical amnesia that allows for the continuance of oppressive systems (Hussain & Narayan, 2000; Harvey, 2001).

The Risks of Ongoing Sanitization

What if the ongoing trend of sanitizing history continues to gain traction, with significant figures like Harriet Tubman fading from public consciousness? The consequences could be dire, not only for academic discourse but for generations of Americans seeking to understand their own history. Key points include:

  • Critical Context: If Tubman’s legacy is relegated to footnotes in history books, future generations may lack the critical context necessary to grapple with racial injustice and inequality (Fagan et al., 2007).
  • Lost Lessons: Without her example of bravery and strategic thinking in leading enslaved individuals to freedom, lessons of resilience and the necessity of resistance are at risk of being lost.
  • Confronting Status Quo: The denial of historical figures’ roles can embolden those who prefer to maintain the status quo, allowing for revisionist narratives that further marginalize already oppressed communities.

Furthermore, the shift in how history is presented could undermine efforts to mobilize activism grounded in the lessons of the past. If Tubman is not viewed as a pivotal figure, current movements for racial justice may lack the historical depth to resonate with the broader population.

Igniting a Movement for Historical Accuracy

What if this controversy over the National Park Service’s revisions ignites a broader social movement aimed at preserving historical accuracy? Such a movement could lead to:

  • Inclusive Representation: Activists and educators might rally to demand a more inclusive and truthful representation of history that acknowledges the complex narratives of all peoples involved.
  • Transformative Education: Academic institutions, museums, and government agencies reevaluating their approaches to teaching history.
  • Grassroots Initiatives: Local communities creating educational programming that highlights figures like Tubman alongside their contributions to justice and equality.

This potential movement could transform how history is presented, fostering critical engagement with the past that encourages nuanced discussions about race, identity, and systemic injustices (Broyld, 2019; Montaldo, 2014).

Additionally, policy changes could support equitable representation in educational curricula, ensuring that historically excluded narratives are elevated. Increased funding for initiatives promoting historical literacy could reinforce the importance of diversity in education.

Institutional Reckoning and Historical Integrity

What if this backlash prompts an institutional reckoning among federal agencies, including the National Park Service? The significant outcry could compel policymakers to review broader practices surrounding historical documentation and representation. Potential outcomes include:

  • Restorative Initiatives: Government acknowledgment of its role in perpetuating historical narratives that marginalize certain groups.
  • Collaborative Creation: Agencies collaborating with historians, community leaders, and educators to create comprehensive accounts of historical figures, ensuring that their complexities are fully acknowledged (Jeffery & Murray, 2018).

Furthermore, a shift in funding priorities could ensure that projects aimed at preserving the memories of underrepresented figures receive adequate support, fostering a more inclusive approach to cultural heritage and education (Hothi et al., 2023).

Complexities of Representation

Navigating the implications of this revision requires considering the complexities of representation in historical narratives. Historical figures like Harriet Tubman must be placed within a genuine context that reflects not only their achievements but also the societal challenges they faced. Key considerations include:

  • Intersectionality: Looking at Tubman through lenses that highlight her unique struggles and contributions to social change (Collins, 2000).
  • Empowered Education: Integrating complexities into curricula that enrich educational discourse and empower students to critically engage with their histories.

The struggle for accurate representation of figures like Tubman is intrinsically linked to broader social movements advocating for justice and equity. If we fail to advocate for representation, we risk allowing historical narratives to serve particular interests while marginalizing voices of those who fought for justice.

Conversely, a successful movement for historical accuracy could invigorate social justice networks, using Tubman’s legacy as a rallying point for contemporary movements and inspiring individuals to connect their struggles to historical battles for civil rights and freedom.

Unpacking Historical Amnesia

Confronting the revisions made to the National Park Service’s webpage necessitates examining the concept of historical amnesia within society. This selective remembrance of historical figures like Tubman feeds into larger narratives aimed at simplifying or sanitizing complex histories. Key points include:

  • Progress Myths: Historical amnesia perpetuates myths about the progress of social justice, leading contemporary society to overlook ongoing systemic oppression.
  • Policy Undermining: A lack of understanding about the historical context of racial injustice can lead to misguided policy decisions that fail to address ongoing disparities.

Recognizing the history of resistance embodied in figures like Tubman can provide a roadmap for contemporary action toward meaningful social change.

Educational Implications

The ongoing dialogue surrounding these revisions highlights the critical need for educators to rethink how they teach history. The narratives prioritized in educational settings significantly impact students’ understanding of their place in society and their responsibility to advocate for justice.

Curricula centered around diverse historical figures, including Harriet Tubman, can cultivate empathy and critical thinking skills, enriching students’ understanding of history and encouraging them to actively engage with contemporary issues of race and justice.

Conclusion

The changes made to the National Park Service’s Underground Railroad webpage serve as a critical reminder of the ongoing struggle for historical accuracy and representation. Whether this incident leads to a wilful erasure of history or inspires a movement for greater accountability remains to be seen. However, it is evident that the legacy of figures like Harriet Tubman must not be relegated to obscurity. The struggle for truth is as vital now as it was in her time, and the ongoing dialogue about historical representation is essential for fostering a more just and equitable society.

References

  • Adams, M., Doane, A., & Thompson, D. (2015). Racial exclusion and historical amnesia in contemporary discourse. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 45-62.
  • Broyld, G. (2019). The complexities of historical narratives: A critical analysis of inclusion in education. History Education Research Journal, 16(2), 25-39.
  • Busey, E., & Walker, J. (2017). Legislative measures and historical representation: Lessons from the past. Journal of Educational Policy, 32(3), 321-335.
  • Campbell, D. (2004). The legacy of Harriet Tubman: A historical perspective. American History Journal, 37(2), 78-92.
  • Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
  • Cogley, C., & Sargent, C. (2001). The struggle for historical integrity: A critical assessment of federal agencies. Public History Review, 8(1), 1-16.
  • Crewe, K. (2006). The importance of diversity in education: Reflections on curriculum development. Education and Society, 24(1), 29-42.
  • Doane, A. (2006). The impact of historical erasure on community organizing. Social Movement Studies, 5(2), 153-166.
  • Fagan, J., Lim, J., & Salas, M. (2007). Historical context and racial disparities in American society. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 115-135.
  • Gillborn, D. (2006). Critical race theory in education: A review. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 467-497.
  • Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. Routledge.
  • Hothi, K., King, J., & Peters, L. (2023). Towards an inclusive approach to cultural heritage and education. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 29(3), 205-220.
  • Hussain, M., & Narayan, N. (2000). The role of history in shaping national identity. The Journal of Historical Sociology, 13(2), 179-198.
  • Jeffery, C., & Murray, R. (2018). Rethinking historical narratives: Collaboration and community engagement. History & Policy Journal, 16(1), 14-28.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7-24.
  • McGee, T., & Stovall, D. (2015). The importance of historical narratives in social justice education. Journal of Social Justice in Education, 4(1), 1-15.
  • Montaldo, C. (2014). Engaging students through critical history: New approaches to teaching in diverse classrooms. Social Studies Research and Practice, 9(3), 78-88.
  • Thompson, D., Broyld, G., & Reed, S. (2018). A new generation of social justice advocates: Teaching history through narratives of resilience. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(5), 615-635.
← Prev Next →