Muslim World Report

The Rise and Fall of India's Smart Cities Mission

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Apr 3, 2025 9:45 AM | 6 min read | 1272 words

The Rise and Fall of India’s Smart Cities Mission: A Cautionary Tale

TL;DR: The Smart Cities Mission in India, once a promising innovation in urban governance, has failed due to corruption and mismanagement, resulting in widespread disillusionment among citizens. This blog explores the implications of its downfall and considers alternative paths for urban development.

The ambitious Smart Cities Mission launched in India was heralded as a revolutionary initiative, promising to redefine urban living through a blend of advanced technology and sustainable practices. Government promoters touted it as a game changer, pledging improved infrastructure, enhanced public services, and an overall higher quality of life for millions of citizens. However, as the initiative falters, it illustrates the consequences of unchecked ambition and systemic failures that accompany poorly conceived policies. Instead of ushering in an era of modernity, the Smart Cities Mission has devolved into a cautionary tale of corruption, ineffective governance, and shattered public trust.

Key Issues Faced by the Smart Cities Mission

From its inception, the mission was plagued by:

  • Lack of coherent strategy: There was no clear roadmap for implementation.
  • Transparency issues: Reports emerged detailing how political allies and corporate interests capitalized on the initiative, siphoning off funds intended for urban development (Mazzucato, 2018).
  • Deteriorating living conditions: Cities envisioned as beacons of innovation are now grappling with severe challenges, such as air quality levels in Mumbai comparable to those in New Delhi, one of the most polluted cities in the world (Praharaj et al., 2017).

This collapse points to a broader global phenomenon where ambitious urban initiatives often fail due to weak execution and the pervasive influence of vested interests. Such systemic failures are not unique to India; they resonate across many emerging economies grappling with the challenges of urban governance (Weiss et al., 1995). Citizens worldwide are increasingly questioning the intentions and capabilities of their governments, which could fuel anti-establishment movements, disrupt social cohesion, and reshape political landscapes (Nanda, 2005).

As the Indian government pivots toward new initiatives, citizens remain skeptical of official promises. The cycle of unfulfilled aspirations risks deepening disenchantment among the populace, undermining the foundations of democratic accountability and civic trust. In an era where urbanization is often depicted as a pathway to progress, the downfall of the Smart Cities Mission serves as a stark reminder that without a genuine commitment to participatory governance, comprehensive planning, and adherence to the common good, such ambitious endeavors are destined to fail (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983).

What If the Smart Cities Mission is Abandoned Completely?

Should the Indian government choose to abandon the Smart Cities Mission altogether, the implications could be profound:

  1. Vacuum in urban planning: Cities already faltering under mismanagement could descend further into chaos.
  2. Civil unrest: Citizens who placed their hopes in modernization might express discontent vocally, challenging political leaders’ legitimacy.
  3. Tarnished global image: The abandonment could further tarnish India’s image as a rising power, leading to a reassessment of engagement from global investors (Ederveen et al., 2006).
  4. Economic repercussions: A withdrawal of foreign investment could have cascading effects on India’s economy, already grappling with numerous challenges.

In response, the government could pivot toward a grassroots, community-focused approach to urban development. Mobilizing local communities to actively participate in planning and executing urban projects could rebuild trust and ensure that initiatives align more closely with residents’ needs. This shift would require a sincere commitment to transparency and accountability—elements glaringly absent from the Smart Cities Mission thus far (Ladson-Billings, 1995).

What If the Mission is Rebranded?

Rebranding the Smart Cities Mission could be another path the government might consider, albeit fraught with challenges:

  • Skepticism among citizens: If officials introduce a new initiative under a different name, citizens are likely to view it as a mere cosmetic alteration rather than a meaningful policy shift.
  • Restoration of public trust: The rebranded initiative would need to confront the failures of its predecessor head-on, aiming to restore trust through transparency and community engagement.

If successfully executed, this approach could offer a fresh start. By learning from past mistakes, the government could implement a more inclusive, participatory model of urban governance that fosters genuine ownership among citizens (Gielen et al., 2019). Moreover, rebranding presents an opportunity to align with global sustainability goals, potentially attracting foreign investment aimed at promoting green technologies and urban resilience.

What If the Mission is Reformed?

Reforming the Smart Cities Mission requires a concerted effort to address systemic issues:

  • Enhance planning and execution: This involves ensuring rigorous accountability measures are in place to prevent corruption.
  • Decentralized governance: Implementing a decentralized structure could empower local authorities, allowing them to take ownership of urban development initiatives (Hagan & Dinovitzer, 1999).
  • Capacity building: Investing in skills for urban planners and local officials will be essential, emphasizing innovative technologies and data-driven management (Sisinni et al., 2018).

Successful reform hinges on restoring public trust through open dialogues where grievances are not only heard but acted upon. If the government can demonstrate meaningful change, it may not only salvage the Smart Cities Mission but also redefine urban living for millions.

Overarching Implications of the Mission’s Downfall

The failures associated with the Smart Cities Mission resonate with critical questions about urban policy in India, including:

  1. Community disengagement: Disillusionment may discourage active community participation in future urban initiatives.
  2. Political legitimacy: The tarnished reputation of the mission could impact political support for authorities associated with it.
  3. Resource allocation: Ineffective resource allocation reveals systemic inefficiencies requiring immediate redress.
  4. Perception of urban governance: Increased scrutiny toward future initiatives may arise as citizens grow disenchanted.
  5. Opportunities for innovation: The collapse creates a chance to foster adaptive strategies focused on community needs.
  6. Alternative models of urban development: Cities might explore sustainability, resilience planning, or participatory governance.
  7. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): The decline aligns with broader challenges in meeting the UN’s SDGs regarding urban sustainability and equity.
  8. Digital transformation: The mission’s shortcomings underscore the need for an ethical, community-engaged approach to technology in urban governance.

Conclusion

The promises of political leaders, once regarded as a springboard for progress, have devolved into mere rhetorical devices aimed at siphoning taxpayer money into corporate allies’ pockets. As citizens survey the rubble of what was once a bold vision, they are left to ponder: when in search of smart cities did we become a country that feels dumber?

References

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  • Ederveen, S., de Groot, H. L. F., & Nahuis, R. (2006). Fertile Soil for Structural Funds? A Panel Data Analysis of the Conditional Effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy. Kyklos, 59(3), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00318.x
  • Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M., Wagner, N., & Gorini, R. (2019). The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006
  • Hagan, J., & Dinovitzer, R. (1999). Collective Efficacy and Crime: The Role of the Community. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(4), 538-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427899036004006
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
  • Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034
  • Praharaj, S., Han, H., & Hawken, S. (2017). Innovative Civic Engagement and Digital Urban Infrastructure: Lessons from 100 Smart Cities Mission in India. Procedia Engineering, 196, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.305
  • Sisinni, E., Saifullah, A., Han, S., Jennehag, U., & Gidlund, M. (2018). Industrial Internet of Things: Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(2), 916-930. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2018.2852491
  • Weiss, J. A., Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1995). From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1075–1116. https://doi.org/10.2307/258896
← Prev Next →