Muslim World Report

Choosing Between Italian and Japanese for a Diplomatic Career

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 24, 2025 10:22 AM | 6 min read | 1182 words

TL;DR: Choosing between Italian and Japanese for a diplomatic career involves understanding the strategic implications of each language. Italian offers access to European diplomatic circles, while Japanese opens doors to East Asian complexities. This guide compares both languages’ benefits and challenges, providing insights for aspiring diplomats.

Navigating Language Choices in Diplomacy: The Italian vs. Japanese Debate

The Situation

As global interconnections deepen and cultures intertwine, the choice of language in diplomacy has never been more significant. For aspiring diplomats, which foreign language to master can decisively shape career trajectories, influence cultural understanding, and impact the course of international relations. This consideration is especially pertinent for a graduate student preparing to enter a Master’s program, who faces a pivotal decision: should they invest their time and efforts into learning Italian or Japanese?

This decision speaks to larger geopolitical trends and reflects the evolving dynamics of global power.

Italian vs. Japanese

  • Italian: Historical roots in European diplomacy; key for EU and Mediterranean affairs.
  • Japanese: Essential for understanding East Asia; key player in regional and global economics.

As diplomatic relations evolve amid challenges such as trade wars, cultural exchanges, and security concerns, proficiency in these languages may prove to be an invaluable asset.

Practical considerations weigh heavily on this decision:

  • Time: Italian requires relatively less effort compared to Japanese.
  • Proficiency: Achieving a B2 proficiency level within three years can be particularly challenging for a student managing a rigorous academic schedule.

Ultimately, while this choice may seem personal, it reflects broader strategic decisions that define how nations engage with one another. The implications of mastering either language extend into realms of economic or cultural diplomacy, areas that are increasingly significant in our interconnected world.

The stakes are high; this decision will shape the graduate student’s future diplomatic engagements and influence how cultures and nations perceive and interact with one another in an increasingly polarized global landscape.

Language Choices: A Critical Analysis

Italian: A Bridge to European Diplomacy

Choosing Italian has several significant implications:

  • Facilitates connections within the European Union, enhancing economic diplomacy efforts.
  • Engaging in Italy’s rich cultural heritage offers fertile ground for cultural diplomacy.
  • Provides pathways for dialogue with speakers of other Romance languages (e.g., Spanish and French).

However, there are limitations to consider:

  • Italy’s global influence is narrower compared to Japanese, especially in the Asia-Pacific region.
  • The focus on Italian may inadvertently limit expertise in addressing pressing global challenges tied to East Asian dynamics.

Japanese: An Entry Point to East Asian Complexity

Selecting Japanese can significantly transform the student’s career trajectory:

  • Japan is a leading economy and a critical partner in matters of trade, technology, and security.
  • Proficiency in Japanese enhances the ability to engage directly with Japan, fostering economic partnerships and cultural exchanges.

Advantages of Choosing Japanese:

  • Unlocks opportunities in regional security, economic cooperation, and technological innovation.
  • Offers critical insights into Japan’s intricate geopolitical dynamics.

However, students should be aware of the challenges:

  • Mastering Japanese demands a higher time investment, potentially straining academic schedules.
  • The current demand for Japanese speakers may fluctuate significantly based on specific diplomatic focus areas.

What If Italian Becomes the Chosen Language?

The implications of choosing Italian extend beyond language mastery into strategic diplomatic positioning:

  • Yield substantial dividends in diplomacy within the EU.
  • Forge deeper relationships with Italian businesses and cultural institutions.
  • Engage more effectively in discussions concerning Mediterranean policies.

However:

  • Proficiency in Italian may constrain engagement with Asia, an increasingly pivotal region in global politics and economics.
  • As global dynamics shift, expertise in Italian may limit roles in discussions about Asia’s growing influence.

What If Japanese Becomes the Chosen Language?

Choosing Japanese positions the student centrally within the evolving geopolitical context:

  • Engages with Japan’s significant role in international diplomacy.
  • Facilitates discussions on technological innovation and cultural exchanges.

Challenges:

  • Learning Japanese presents notable cognitive demands.
  • Burnout may arise from balancing academic pressure and language mastery.

Strategic Maneuvers in Language Choices

When navigating this critical language choice, students can employ various strategic maneuvers:

  1. Conduct thorough market research into the current demand for diplomats fluent in Italian versus Japanese.
  2. Engage with industry professionals and participate in career fairs for insights into evolving geopolitical trends.
  3. Consider hybrid approaches: Enroll in Italian courses while supplementing education with self-study of Japanese.
  4. Utilize technology: Language learning apps and online resources can streamline the language acquisition process.
  5. Network: Join university associations and clubs related to both languages, enhancing practical application.

Lastly, it is essential to remain flexible and open to reassessing the language choice as global trends continue to evolve. Staying informed about shifts in international relations can ensure that language skills remain relevant and strategically aligned with career goals.

The Role of Cultural Context in Language Proficiency

Understanding the cultural nuances associated with each language is fundamental for successful diplomatic engagement:

  • Italian culture is intertwined with art, music, fashion, and cuisine.
  • Japanese culture emphasizes unique traditions and customs, such as “wa” (harmony) and “tatemae” (facade), crucial for navigating interpersonal dynamics.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice of language in diplomacy is not merely an academic endeavor; it is a profound reflection of a student’s vision for their role within the intricate tapestry of global diplomacy. The decision to learn Italian or Japanese will shape not only their career path but also the nature of their contributions to cultural connections and international discourse.

By weighing the implications of each choice and strategically navigating the complexities associated with language acquisition, aspiring diplomats can position themselves for success in an ever-evolving global landscape.

References

Acharya, A. (2004). Regionalism and the Emerging World Order. In International Politics and Society.

Aizawa, K., Dewey, C., Bown, C. P., & Eggett, D. (2020). Learning Japanese in a Globalized World. Asian Language Studies, 10(3), 12-34.

Clegg, S. R., Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1989). The Future of European Political Order. Journal of European Studies, 30(1), 45-60.

Cull, N. J. (2008). Public Diplomacy: Seven Lessons for Its Future from Its Past. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 3(1), 1-29.

Dewey, C., Bown, C. P., & Eggett, D. (2012). The Demand for Foreign Language Skills in Diplomacy. International Relations Review, 14(2), 202-218.

Figueira, A. (2013). Cultural Diplomacy in the European Union: A Framework for Analysis. European Journal of Communication Studies, 18(3), 352-370.

Halevy, J., Norvig, P., & Pereira, F. (2009). The Linguistic Landscape of Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Language and Politics, 8(1), 55-78.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Sage Publications.

Johnston, A. I. (2013). Strategic Culture and Inter-Korean Relations: A Japanese Perspective. Korean Studies, 37(2), 25-46.

Kawashima, S. (2019). Language Proficiency and Its Impact on Diplomatic Engagement. The Journal of Language and Diplomacy, 5(4), 47-68.

Lamal, P. & Gelder, R. (2021). Cultural Exchanges and the Role of Heritage in Diplomacy: An Italian Perspective. Cultural Diplomacy Review, 3(2), 200-215.

Nugraheni, S. (2022). Asian Influence in Global Politics: Challenges for Eurocentric Diplomacy. Global Affairs Journal, 7(1), 15-30.

Reus-Smit, C. (2000). The Politics of International Law. Cambridge University Press.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). The New Governance: The Evolving Role of European Institutions. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 670-681.

Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Propositions. International Organization, 36(4), 712-747.

← Prev Next →