Muslim World Report

South Korea Proposes 4.5-Day Workweek to Enhance Labor Standards

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 22, 2025 9:15 AM | 9 min read | 1728 words

TL;DR: South Korea is set to propose a 4.5-day workweek, reducing the standard workweek from 52 hours to 48 hours, aiming to enhance work-life balance and mental health of employees. While this initiative could lead to greater job satisfaction and productivity, it may face corporate resistance that could hinder its success.

Rethinking Work: South Korea’s Shift Towards a 4.5-Day Workweek

In a bold move to reshape its labor landscape, the South Korean government has announced a revolutionary initiative for a 4.5-day workweek. Spearheaded by President Lee Jae-myung and the Ministry of Employment and Labor, this proposal aims to:

  • Reduce the standard workweek from an exhausting 52 hours to a more reasonable 48 hours.
  • Curtail overtime from 12 to 8 hours.

This initiative transcends mere policy reform; it serves as a powerful critique of entrenched capitalist work models and stands as a significant signal of change in a global context increasingly aware of labor exploitation and mental health issues.

Historically, South Korea has been synonymous with a relentless work culture, earning a reputation as one of the hardest-working nations worldwide. The country’s labor market has long been characterized by:

  • Grueling hours
  • High-pressure environments
  • A unidimensional focus on productivity (E. Jeffrey Hill et al., 2001; Mikko Härmä, 2006)

The drive behind this new workweek framework arises from a growing recognition of mental well-being among workers and the vital connection between job satisfaction and productivity (Steven E. Lerman et al., 2012). As research indicates, happier employees are often more productive, and this policy seeks to alleviate the burnout and mental health crises plaguing many South Korean workers (Laura K. Barger et al., 2005; Paul R. Katz & Jurgis Karuza, 2005).

Potential Benefits of the Initiative

The potential benefits of this initiative extend beyond physical health to encompass broader social implications, including:

  • Increased work-life balance
  • Challenges to existing norms that prioritize unyielding productivity over worker welfare (Erin L. Kelly & Phyllis Moen, 2007)

Such a shift could potentially position South Korea as a model for countries in the Global South that grapple with similar overwork challenges, where labor conditions often mirror those of Korea (Tammy D. Allen et al., 2012; Carolyn A. Denton & Jan Hasbrouck, 2009).

What If South Korea’s Initiative is Successfully Implemented?

If South Korea successfully implements the 4.5-day workweek, the implications for its workforce could be profound:

  • Employees are likely to experience enhanced mental health and job satisfaction, translating into heightened productivity.
  • Reduced working hours may significantly improve employee well-being and motivation (Andrew D. Auerbach et al., 2007; Franklyn Dexter et al., 2000).

Moreover, companies may find that this shift fosters innovation as they embrace flexible work practices and leverage technology effectively. Employees who are less stressed and more engaged can lead to a more dynamic work environment, allowing organizations to explore novel ideas and practices (Larry E. Greiner, 1997). This shift could inspire similar reforms throughout the Asia-Pacific region, prompting countries like Japan and China—which have also been criticized for overwork—to reconsider their labor models (Xiaodong Zhu, 2012).

On an international scale, South Korea’s pioneering approach could serve as a beacon, inspiring labor reforms in countries grappling with overwork, particularly in the Global South, where labor conditions often mirror those of Korea. Should this initiative succeed, it could ignite a broader movement advocating for labor reforms that emphasize the right to a balanced life.

What If the Initiative is Met with Strong Corporate Resistance?

Conversely, if the government faces strong corporate resistance against the implementation of the 4.5-day workweek, South Korea may encounter significant obstacles:

  • Corporations accustomed to traditional work hours may oppose these reforms, citing productivity concerns.
  • This resistance could undermine public support, complicating the narrative around labor improvements and risking the initiative’s credibility (Alwyn Young, 2003).

In this scenario, the South Korean government would need to navigate a complex landscape filled with competing interests. A backlash from corporate entities could heighten tensions between labor unions and businesses, complicating the dialogue around worker rights. As a result, critical reforms related to the support law for reduced hours may face delays or significant amendments, jeopardizing the initiative’s success.

The social implications for workers could also be dire; a failure to deliver on the 4.5-day workweek may disillusion labor advocates and reinforce a sense of helplessness among employees. This could lead to increased protest activity, compromising the broader social goals outlined in President Lee Jae-myung’s Universal Basic Service model.

If the initiative falters under corporate pressure, it might perpetuate a narrative framing labor improvements as unattainable, further entrenching a cycle of overwork and mental health challenges. Globally, a failure to implement the 4.5-day workweek could stifle momentum for labor reform discussions, especially in countries where working conditions are even more dire.

What If the Global Response to the Initiative is Overwhelmingly Positive?

Should the global response to South Korea’s 4.5-day workweek be overwhelmingly positive, it could catalyze a wave of solidarity among labor movements worldwide. International organizations and NGOs may collaborate with domestic unions, reigniting advocacy for labor rights framed as essential components of social welfare (Nicholas A. Ash́ford et al., 2020).

This scenario could represent a critical shift in the perception of labor rights as fundamental components of social welfare. Countries historically resistant to labor reforms might begin to reassess their policies, inspired by South Korea’s lead. This could entail a renewed focus on workers’ rights globally, fostering an environment where collective bargaining gains traction.

Should international support for this initiative strengthen, it could bolster South Korea’s negotiating power in trade agreements, positioning the nation as a leader in progressive labor rights. Economies in the Global South, facing similar labor challenges, may engage in discussions about equitable labor practices, challenging narratives that prioritize corporate profitability over human welfare.

For South Korea, a positive global reception could solidify the administration’s standing domestically, as citizens rally around a cause that resonates with their desire for improved living conditions. This momentum could lead to more ambitious social policies advocating for comprehensive reform across education, healthcare, and worker protections.

Strategic Maneuvers for All Players Involved

To navigate the complexities surrounding the implementation of the 4.5-day workweek, strategic maneuvers are essential for all stakeholders involved:

  • The South Korean Government: Engage stakeholders—including labor unions, corporate entities, and civil society—to build consensus around reducing working hours. Transparent communication about intended outcomes and supporting evidence will be vital.

  • Labor Unions: Strengthen advocacy efforts by uniting workers around improved working conditions. Embracing dialogue with the government and employers can help negotiate terms that balance corporate interests and worker rights.

  • Employers: Adopt a proactive approach by investing in change management strategies to facilitate a smoother transition to a reduced workweek. Piloting the new schedule, collecting feedback, and demonstrating potential productivity gains through improved morale are essential steps.

  • Civil Society Organizations: Leverage the international response to South Korea’s initiative to amplify calls for labor reform, fostering global solidarity among workers. Support campaigns promoting the right to disconnect and advocate for equitable pay.

The challenges of transitioning to a 4.5-day workweek will require collaborative navigation of potential conflicts of interest while prioritizing employee well-being. The integration of flexible work practices can benefit various sectors, supported by advancements in technology that enhance productivity while operating fewer hours.

Societal Shift Towards a Work-Life Balance

The overarching goal of introducing a 4.5-day workweek in South Korea is to promote a healthier work-life balance for employees. As societal norms evolve, there is increasing recognition that quality of life should not be sacrificed for productivity. A shift towards a model prioritizing employee well-being can lead to numerous positive outcomes, including:

  • Reduced healthcare costs related to stress-related illnesses
  • Improved overall happiness

Research shows that countries promoting a balanced workweek often report lower burnout rates and higher job satisfaction levels among employees (Erin L. Kelly & Phyllis Moen, 2007). These findings underscore the potential for a cultural shift within South Korea, where work-life balance must be redefined to reflect modern workforce needs.

As South Korea embarks on this transformative journey, engaging various demographics, including younger workers, is essential. These workers, increasingly vocal about their desire for flexible arrangements, have the potential to influence labor movements through social media and digital platforms.

Global conversations around labor practices are evolving, and South Korea’s move could catalyze wider discussions on employee treatment and workplace quality of life. Should the 4.5-day workweek succeed, it may inspire other nations to reconsider their labor standards and practices, contributing to a more equitable global labor landscape.

Conclusion: A Crossroads for Labor Reform

As South Korea pursues the 4.5-day workweek, all stakeholders must remain vigilant and proactive in addressing challenges associated with this transformative initiative. Successfully navigating resistance, prioritizing worker welfare, and fostering a collaborative environment will define South Korea’s leadership role in the global labor movement.

The unfolding narrative surrounding this initiative will be pivotal for labor reform discussions worldwide, setting a precedent for how nations can balance economic demands with employee well-being. As South Korea stands at this crossroads, the success or failure of its bold initiative has the potential to reshape labor policies and set new standards for employee welfare for generations to come.

References

  • Auerbach, A. D., et al. (2007). “Workplace Schedules and Employee Productivity.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.
  • Barger, L. K., et al. (2005). “Effects of Sleep Deficiency on Work Performance.” Sleep.
  • Berg, P., et al. (2004). “Job Quality and Work-life Balance.” Human Resource Management Review.
  • Bindl, U. K., et al. (2018). “The Role of Leadership in Employee Well-being.” The Leadership Quarterly.
  • Dexter, F., et al. (2000). “The Impact of Hour Reductions on Employee Performance.” American Journal of Health Promotion.
  • Denton, C. A., & Hasbrouck, J. (2009). “The Impact of Work-Life Balance on Employee Well-being.” Social Science Research.
  • Greiner, L. E. (1997). “Growth and Innovation: The Role of Flexible Work Schedules.” Management Science Review.
  • Härmä, M. (2006). “Working Hours and Health.” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health.
  • Hinkin, T. R., & Tracey, J. B. (2010). “The Impact of Flexible Work Arrangements on Job Performance.” Industrial Relations Research Association.
  • Hill, E. J., et al. (2001). “Work-Life Balance and Employee Well-Being.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.
  • Kelly, E. L., & Moen, P. (2007). “Maintaining Work-Life Balance: The Role of Organizational Culture.” Work and Occupations.
  • Lerman, S. E., et al. (2012). “Job Satisfaction and the Mental Health of Employees.” American Journal of Industrial Medicine.
  • Zhu, X. (2012). “Work Culture and Labor Reforms in East Asia.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law.
← Prev Next →