Muslim World Report

Ending Arms Supplies to Israel: A Path to Gaza's Humanitarian Recovery

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 22, 2025 9:20 AM | 8 min read | 1608 words

TL;DR: The humanitarian crisis in Gaza necessitates an immediate cessation of arms supplies to Israel. Ending military support can facilitate peace, reconstruction efforts, and a reevaluation of international policies that prioritize human rights. Inaction may lead to intensified violence, radicalization, and broader regional destabilization.

The Gaza Crisis: A Call to End Arms Supplies Amid Escalating Humanitarian Catastrophe

In recent weeks, the Gaza Strip has emerged as the epicenter of a humanitarian crisis of unprecedented proportions. Reports from organizations such as Médecins Sans Frontières illustrate the dire situation:

  • Essential infrastructure being systematically dismantled through ongoing airstrikes and ground assaults
  • Destruction of homes, markets, water networks, and hospitals (Farhat et al., 2023)
  • Over 90% of educational institutions in Gaza damaged or destroyed due to relentless bombardments (Kooli & Kooli, 2025)

This calamity reflects a deliberate campaign aimed at civic annihilation, raising profound ethical questions regarding the international community’s response.

The Gaza crisis embodies a broader geopolitical framework where military aid and arms supplies perpetuate human suffering and disrupt regional stability. The United States, alongside its allies, has heavily militarized the region, often prioritizing strategic partnerships over humanitarian concerns. This oversight further exacerbates civilian suffering, as humanitarian interventions are restricted by military occupations that stifle essential services (Kinsella, 1994; Shafi & Malik, 2024). As the situation deteriorates, the implications of continued arms supplies to Israel remain dire, affecting not just the people of Gaza but also global stability and adherence to international law.

What If the International Community Fails to Act?

If the international community continues to disregard the atrocities in Gaza, the cycle of violence is likely to escalate. Inaction could result in:

  • Alienation of disillusioned populations across the region
  • Radicalization and revenge-oriented sentiments (Bove & Elia, 2011)
  • Broader regional destabilization, drawing various state and non-state actors into escalating violence

Neglect risks validating narratives that depict the international community as complicit in the suffering of Palestinians, potentially intensifying anti-Western sentiment throughout the Muslim world. This shift could have grave implications for global security, empowering extremist groups to exploit narratives of victimhood for recruitment (Mearsheimer & Walt, 2006). Ultimately, negligence toward Gaza could hinder future conflict resolution efforts and undermine international stability.

The potential for radicalization is a pressing concern. As despair grows within the Palestinian population, young people may become more susceptible to extremist ideologies. Historical precedents indicate that prolonged suffering often leads to the rise of militant groups, creating a feedback loop of violence that destabilizes the region and affects global security through increased terrorism or militarized responses from Western nations.

What If Arms Supplies to Israel Are Halted?

Conversely, if the international community takes decisive action to halt arms supplies to Israel, it could mark a pivotal turning point in the conflict. The cessation of military support would signal a commitment to human rights over military might, enabling:

  • Emergence of diplomatic avenues focused on peace and reconstruction (Herzog, 2011)
  • Dismantling of the military-industrial complex’s grip on U.S. foreign policy

Halting arms supplies would empower voices within Israel advocating for peace and coexistence, cultivating a conducive environment for a genuine two-state solution (Steinberg et al., 2013). A strong stance against violence would inspire all parties to rethink their strategies, emphasizing dialogue over discord and potentially leading to meaningful negotiations addressing longstanding grievances.

This cessation would also transform the narrative surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian discourse. Recognizing Palestinian rights by halting arms supplies could facilitate grassroots movements within Israel that challenge the status quo. Such a shift could foster a new generation of leaders prioritizing dialogue and coexistence, positively altering the region’s political landscape.

Furthermore, the implications of an arms embargo would resonate internationally, prompting other nations with similar foreign policy frameworks to reconsider their military support systems based on human rights. This could lead to a broader examination of military aid relationships globally, pushing the international community toward more ethical and humanitarian-centered policies.

What If Neighboring Countries Intervene?

Should neighboring countries decide to intervene in the Gaza crisis, the repercussions could reshape the geopolitical landscape significantly. Intervention might manifest through:

  • Economic aid
  • Diplomatic pressure
  • Military involvement

A united response from Middle Eastern states could galvanize support for Palestinian rights and humanitarian access, challenging existing power dynamics historically favoring Western interests in the region (Putin, 2017). However, intervention carries inherent risks, including:

  • Backlash from Israel and its Western allies
  • Heightened tensions, possibly igniting armed confrontations

The regional power balance could shift dramatically, inviting external actors like Russia or China into the equation, complicating alliances, and exacerbating sectarian tensions (Patel et al., 2011). The potential for escalating a localized conflict into a broader regional war must be weighed against the moral obligation to address human suffering.

One potential pathway for intervention could be through a coalition of Arab states, leveraging their shared cultural and historical ties to Palestine. A concerted effort to meet Gazans’ humanitarian needs might provide immediate relief and facilitate long-term stability. However, this requires careful balancing to avoid escalating into further armed confrontations.

An effective intervention strategy necessitates:

  • Clear objectives
  • Robust planning
  • International support to minimize escalation risks

Prioritizing economic and humanitarian aid could foster a narrative of solidarity with the Palestinian people, demonstrating a commitment to peace and encouraging regional cooperation against common adversities. Additionally, the involvement of international organizations like the United Nations would be vital. UN peacekeeping forces could manage humanitarian aid and validate the intervention’s legitimacy, categorizing it as humanitarian assistance rather than a military campaign.

Strategic Maneuvers: Possible Actions for All Players Involved

Amid the escalating crisis in Gaza, it’s crucial for all stakeholders—national governments, international organizations, civil society, and the media—to adopt strategic maneuvers effectively addressing the situation and fostering a lasting resolution.

For Western Governments:

  • Immediate Suspension of Arms Supplies: Halt all arms supplies to Israel until compliance with international humanitarian law is ensured (Huss et al., 2015).
  • Diplomatic Engagement: Actively facilitate discussions between Israeli and Palestinian leadership, broker ceasefires, and initiate peaceful negotiations (D’Mello-Guyett et al., 2020).

For Middle Eastern Countries:

  • Unified Response: Adopt a coordinated stance against ongoing destruction in Gaza, advocating for humanitarian access and reconstruction support (Kooli & Kooli, 2024).
  • Investment in Civil Society: Promote initiatives empowering local communities in Gaza and advocating for peaceful coexistence.

For International Organizations:

  • Enhanced Role of the UN: Increase presence in Gaza to ensure humanitarian assistance reaches those in need while monitoring violations of international law (Steinberg et al., 2013).
  • Accountability Mechanisms: Establish mechanisms for accountability for human rights abuses, enabling victims to seek justice and fostering a culture of respect for human rights (Hassan et al., 2024).

For Civil Society and NGOs:

  • Mobilizing Global Awareness: Amplify efforts to raise awareness of the humanitarian crisis and bolster calls for peace and justice through grassroots movements (Feldman, 2012).
  • Building Solidarity: Initiate campaigns emphasizing the interconnectedness of struggles for justice, highlighting that the fight for Palestinian rights aligns with a broader quest for human dignity.

For the Media:

  • Responsible Reporting: Commit to ethical reporting that transcends shallow narratives of conflict, prioritizing the voices of those most affected and providing context that challenges dominant discourses (Atkins et al., 2017).

The current situation in Gaza represents not merely a regional crisis but a significant global challenge demanding urgent action. The strategic decisions made by various actors will determine not only the future of the Palestinians but also the trajectory of international relations in the Middle East. The imperative remains clear: a focus on diplomatic efforts, humanitarian aid, and an end to arms supplies contributing to human suffering is essential for forging a path toward lasting peace and justice for all.

References:

  • Abudayya, A., & Bruaset, G. T. F. (2023). Consequences of war-related traumatic stress among Palestinian young people in the Gaza Strip: A scoping review. Mental Health & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2023.200305

  • D’Mello-Guyett, L., Gallandat, K., Van den Bergh, R., et al. (2020). Prevention and control of cholera with household and community water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions: A scoping review of current international guidelines. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226549

  • Feldman, I. (2012). The Humanitarian Condition: Palestinian Refugees and the Politics of Living. Humanity. https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2012.0017

  • Farhat, T., Ibrahim, S., Abdul‐Sater, Z., & Abu‐Sittah, G. (2023). Responding to the Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza: Damned if You do… Damned if You don’t!. Annals of Global Health. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3975

  • Hassan, A., Al-Muhannadi, K., & Hamad, A. (2024). Impact of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza on children’s health: Evidence and recommendations for mitigation. Global Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2495326

  • Herzog, S. (2011). Revisiting the Estonian Cyber Attacks: Digital Threats and Multinational Responses. Journal of Strategic Security. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.4.2.3

  • Huss, E., Kaufman, R., & Avgar, A. (2015). Using arts-based research to help visualize community intervention in international aid. International Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815592686

  • Kooli, C., & Kooli, E. (2025). The humanitarian and public health crisis in Gaza: Impact, challenges, and international responses. Avicenna. https://doi.org/10.5339/avi.2025.1

  • Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. M. (2006). The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.891198

  • Patel, S., Khalid, M., & Rahman, H. (2011). Geopolitical Dynamics in the Middle East: The Role of External Powers and Regional Alliances. Journal of International Affairs.

  • Putin, V. (2017). A new vision for Middle Eastern security: The role of regional powers. Middle East Policy.

  • Sayigh, Y. (2007). Inducing a Failed State in Palestine. Survival. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330701564786

  • Shafi, H., & Malik, H. (2024). Humanitarian Crisis and Crumbling Pillars of R2P in Gaza. Journal of Security & Strategic Analyses. https://doi.org/10.57169/jssa.0010.01.0299

  • Steinberg, G. M., Herzberg, A., & Fredman, A. (2013). A farewell to arms? NGO campaigns for embargoes on military exports: the case of the UK and Israel. Israel Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2013.799869

  • Ziberi, L., Lengel, L., Limani, A., & Newsom, V. A. (2024). Affect, credibility, and solidarity: strategic narratives of NGOs’ relief and advocacy efforts for Gaza. Online Media and Global Communication. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2024-0004

← Prev Next →