Muslim World Report

Razor Wire: A Costly Tool of Control in Modern Warfare

Dr. Anthony Lindsay | Jun 9, 2025 10:16 AM | 6 min read | 1154 words

TL;DR: The increasing deployment of razor wire, particularly concertina wire, in conflict zones and urban environments raises serious concerns regarding human rights and civil liberties. This blog examines its implications as a tool of oppression, the potential futures of its use, and the need for strategic responses from governments, civil society, and international organizations.

The Unassuming Power of Razor Wire: A Defense Strategy Rooted in Oppression

The Situation

In recent months, the increasing deployment of concertina wire as a primary defensive measure in conflict zones and urban environments has raised urgent questions about the trajectory of modern warfare and its implications for human rights. As of June 2025, this barbed wire, historically viewed as a tool for fortification, has evolved into a potent symbol of oppression, wielded by both state and non-state actors to exert control over populations and suppress dissent.

Governments grappling with significant unrest or military threats have increasingly opted for this cost-effective yet brutal solution, creating barriers not only against armed adversaries but also against civilian populations (Fanna Gama, 2016).

Strategic Advantages

The strategic advantages of concertina wire include:

  • Efficacy against infantry and armored vehicles: While military forces might use explosives to breach barriers, police units often lack the necessary training and resources, complicating urban law enforcement.
  • Containment of dissent: During global protests against perceived injustices—like those framed through a racial lens in Ferguson—the use of concertina wire reinforces a state narrative that portrays dissent as inherently dangerous (Tim Newburn, 2014; Fanna Gama, 2016).

Moreover, the global implications of this trend are profound. The shift toward increasingly militarized policing, particularly in regions with large Muslim populations experiencing unrest, signals a disturbing willingness among governments to resort to harsh measures to maintain control (Eliza J. Hinton & DeAnza A. Cook, 2020).

Humanitarian Consequences

The humanitarian consequences of these barriers are dire:

  • Physical manifestations of exclusion: They further alienate marginalized groups.
  • Threats to civil liberties: The tactical effectiveness must be scrutinized alongside broader societal consequences.

What If Scenarios: The Potential Futures of Concertina Wire Utilization

As the deployment of concertina wire continues to rise, it is critical to explore various potential future scenarios that may emerge if this practice becomes normalized in conflict zones and urban environments.

What if concertina wire became a global standard in urban policing?

Should concertina wire become a global standard for urban policing, cities worldwide could witness a transformative shift in the relationship between state power and civilian life. The implications could include:

  • Increased tensions: Exacerbation of the divide between authorities and communities, fostering an environment of fear rather than cooperation (Eliza J. Hinton & DeAnza A. Cook, 2020).
  • Violent confrontations: Civilian-led protests might devolve into violence as protesters become ensnared by these barriers.
  • Psychological effects: A pervasive sense of entrapment could heighten radicalization among youth, destabilizing socio-political landscapes (Nicholas De Genova, 2002).

International observers and human rights organizations would likely condemn such measures, potentially inviting sanctions and scrutiny against nations adopting these tactics (Erik Linstrum, 2019).

What if governments faced widespread backlash for using concertina wire?

Conversely, a scenario where widespread backlash against concertina wire development could catalyze a reevaluation of policing strategies and military engagement. Potential outcomes include:

  • Opportunities for reform: Public outcry could compel lawmakers to reconsider the legitimacy of oppressive measures (Edward J. Rhodes, 2004).
  • Shifting electoral dynamics: Governments aligning with oppressive measures may find themselves at odds with their constituents, fostering broader coalitions against injustices (Meghan Hussey et al., 2016).
  • International accountability: Global pressure from human rights organizations could advocate for accountability, leading to sanctions for nations prioritizing repression over dialogue (Jessica Weeks, 2008).

What if concertina wire is adopted as a tactical norm in conflict zones?

If concertina wire becomes a tactical norm in conflict zones, the implications for warfare and humanitarian efforts could be catastrophic. Key concerns include:

  • Humanitarian crises exacerbation: Militarized barriers may obstruct aid organizations from operating effectively (Deborah Ascher Barnstone, 2016).
  • Obstacles for civilians and humanitarian workers: Individuals attempting to escape conflict may face insurmountable barriers, putting them at greater risk of violence (Erin Johnson-Williams, 2022).
  • Cycle of violence: Armed groups might adapt strategies to breach these defenses, escalating confrontations (Lora Bex Lempert et al., 2012).

The normalization of concertina wire could lead to increased refugee flows, as families flee environments characterized by extreme militarization and repression, forcing nations to confront the humanitarian consequences of militarized conflict.

Strategic Maneuvers: Navigating the Future of Policing and Conflict

In light of the current situation and the potential scenarios discussed, stakeholders—governments, non-state actors, civil society, and international organizations—must consider their strategic maneuvers carefully.

For Governments

The immediate priority must be fostering dialogue with affected communities and adopting a public safety strategy that respects civil liberties:

  • Retraining police forces to prioritize de-escalation tactics over oppressive measures.
  • Addressing root causes of discontent, such as poverty and inequality (Tina Maschi et al., 2014).

For Non-State Actors

Activist groups must leverage social media and grassroots movements to:

  • Raise awareness about the ramifications of concertina wire.
  • Advocate for peaceful protests and emphasize dialogue over violence (Yarimar Bonilla & Jonathan Rosa, 2015).

For International Organizations

Human rights bodies should:

  • Monitor and report on the use of concertina wire, holding governments accountable for abuses related to these oppressive tactics.
  • Facilitate dialogue between conflicting parties to prevent escalating violence (Victor Gay & Victor Menaldo, 2011).

For the International Community

The global community must reconsider its support for regimes employing concertina wire as a means of restraint:

  • Contingent foreign aid on respect for human rights.
  • Promote democratic values to diminish the appeal of oppressive tactics (Tina Maschi et al., 2014; Eliza J. Hinton & DeAnza A. Cook, 2020).

References

  1. Ascher Barnstone, D. (2016). Humanitarian Implications of Militarized Barriers in Conflict Zones.
  2. Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). Grassroots Movements and the Digital Age: The Role of Social Media in Activism.
  3. De Genova, N. (2002). Radicalization and the Urban Space: The Role of Youth in City Protests.
  4. Eliza, J. Hinton, & Cook, D. A. (2020). Militarized Policing and the Modern Nation-State: A Global Perspective.
  5. Erik, L. (2019). International Responses to National Tactics: The Case of Concertina Wire.
  6. Fanna, G. (2016). Razor Wire and the Politics of Control: Human Rights Implications.
  7. Hussey, M., et al. (2016). Coalition Building in the Age of Dissent: Uniting Against Oppression.
  8. Johnson-Williams, E. (2022). Aid in Conflict: Obstacles for Humanitarian Workers.
  9. Lempert, L. B., et al. (2012). The Cycle of Violence: Barriers and Their Impact on Armed Conflict.
  10. Maschi, T., et al. (2014). Civil Liberties, Equality, and the Role of Community Policing.
  11. Newburn, T. (2014). The Changing Landscape of Policing: Containment Strategies in Urban Settings.
  12. Rhodes, E. J. (2004). Public Sentiment and the Re-evaluation of Security Measures.
  13. Weeks, J. (2008). The Politics of Militarization: Civil Liberties and Public Opinion.
  14. Yarimar, B., & Jonathan, R. (2015). Social Movements and the Power of the Digital Sphere: Grassroots Activism in the 21st Century.
  15. Gay, V., & Menaldo, V. (2011). The Dynamics of Authoritarianism: Strategies of Control in the Modern State.
← Prev Next →